Akarsu Murat, Kones Osman
Department of Internal Medicine.
Department of General Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Bakirköy Dr. Sadi Konuk Training & Research Hospital University of Health Sciences, University of Health Sciences, Istanbul, Turkey.
JSLS. 2018 Oct-Dec;22(4). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2018.00016.
Colorectal cancer is the third leading cause of cancer-related death. Excision of premalignant polyps has a ignificant impact on reducing colorectal cancer mortality and morbidity. Colonoscopy is considered to be the gold standard for the diagnosis and affords an opportunity for treatment of colonic polyps. In recent years, serious debates have taken place because of the biological characteristics of diminutive polyps (DPs), polypectomy complications, and serious costs. There has not yet been a consensus on the management of DPs. The objectives of this study were to demonstrate the real clinical importance of DPs smaller than 5 mm in diameter, which are frequently seen in geriatric patients by new endoscopic techniques, and to help in determining screening and surveillance programs.
The patients who underwent colonoscopy and were found to have a diminutive colorectal polyp (<5 mm from September 1, 2016 through September 1, 2017), were classified into 3 groups according to the imaging method used: flexible spectral imaging color enhancement (FICE), narrow band imaging (NBI), or I-SCAN. In all groups, demographic data were compared according to Paris classification (morphologic) and Kudo classification (correlation between the prediction of endoscopic diagnosis and final pathological examination) in terms of sensitivity, specificity, and negative and positive predictive values.
Two hundred sixty-seven patients were included in the study: 97 in the NBI group, 83 in the FICE group, and 87 in the I-SCAN group. There were no statistically significant differences between NBI, FICE, and I-SCAN in differentiating neoplastic and nonneoplastic polyps, according to the Kruskal-Wallis test ( = .809).
The estimated progression rates of DPs to advanced adenomas or colorectal cancer (CRC) are very low. Missing these polyps or not excising them may lead to failure to diagnose some cancers. There is a need for further comprehensive studies of removing all polyps to determine whether non-high-risk lesions require further pathologic examination and to re-examine routine surveillance programs.
结直肠癌是癌症相关死亡的第三大主要原因。切除癌前息肉对降低结直肠癌的死亡率和发病率有重大影响。结肠镜检查被认为是诊断的金标准,并且为治疗结肠息肉提供了机会。近年来,由于微小息肉(DPs)的生物学特性、息肉切除术并发症以及高昂的费用,引发了激烈的争论。对于DPs的管理尚未达成共识。本研究的目的是通过新的内镜技术,证明直径小于5mm的DPs在老年患者中常见的实际临床重要性,并有助于确定筛查和监测方案。
对2016年9月1日至2017年9月1日期间接受结肠镜检查并发现有微小结直肠息肉(<5mm)的患者,根据所使用的成像方法分为3组:灵活光谱成像彩色增强(FICE)、窄带成像(NBI)或I-SCAN。在所有组中,根据巴黎分类(形态学)和工藤分类(内镜诊断预测与最终病理检查之间的相关性),比较人口统计学数据的敏感性、特异性以及阴性和阳性预测值。
267例患者纳入研究:NBI组97例,FICE组83例,I-SCAN组87例。根据Kruskal-Wallis检验,在区分肿瘤性和非肿瘤性息肉方面,NBI、FICE和I-SCAN之间无统计学显著差异(P = 0.809)。
DPs进展为高级别腺瘤或结直肠癌(CRC)的估计发生率非常低。遗漏这些息肉或不切除它们可能导致一些癌症无法被诊断出来。需要进一步进行全面研究,以确定切除所有息肉是否有必要,非高危病变是否需要进一步病理检查,并重新审视常规监测方案。