• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急诊科实时自主仪表板:5年案例研究

A Real-Time Autonomous Dashboard for the Emergency Department: 5-Year Case Study.

作者信息

Yoo Junsang, Jung Kwang Yul, Kim Taerim, Lee Taerim, Hwang Sung Yeon, Yoon Hee, Shin Tae Gun, Sim Min Seob, Jo Ik Joon, Paeng Hansol, Choi Jong Soo, Cha Won Chul

机构信息

SAIHST, Department of Digital Health, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Department of Emergency Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2018 Nov 22;6(11):e10666. doi: 10.2196/10666.

DOI:10.2196/10666
PMID:30467100
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6284143/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The task of monitoring and managing the entire emergency department (ED) is becoming more important due to increasing pressure on the ED. Recently, dashboards have received the spotlight as health information technology to support these tasks.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to describe the development of a real-time autonomous dashboard for the ED and to evaluate perspectives of clinical staff on its usability.

METHODS

We developed a dashboard based on three principles-"anytime, anywhere, at a glance;" "minimal interruption to workflow;" and "protect patient privacy"-and 3 design features-"geographical layout," "patient-level alert," and "real-time summary data." Items to evaluate the dashboard were selected based on the throughput factor of the conceptual model of ED crowding. Moreover, ED physicians and nurses were surveyed using the system usability scale (SUS) and situation awareness index as well as a questionnaire we created on the basis of the construct of the Situation Awareness Rating Technique.

RESULTS

The first version of the ED dashboard was successfully launched in 2013, and it has undergone 3 major revisions since then because of geographical changes in ED and modifications to improve usability. A total of 52 ED staff members participated in the survey. The average SUS score of the dashboard was 67.6 points, which indicates "OK-to-Good" usability. The participants also reported that the dashboard provided efficient "concentration support" (4.15 points), "complexity representation" (4.02 points), "variability representation" (3.96 points), "information quality" (3.94 points), and "familiarity" (3.94 points). However, the "division of attention" was rated at 2.25 points.

CONCLUSIONS

We developed a real-time autonomous ED dashboard and successfully used it for 5 years with good evaluation from users.

摘要

背景

由于急诊科压力不断增加,监测和管理整个急诊科的任务变得越发重要。近来,仪表板作为支持这些任务的健康信息技术受到了关注。

目的

本研究旨在描述一种用于急诊科的实时自主仪表板的开发过程,并评估临床工作人员对其可用性的看法。

方法

我们基于三条原则——“随时随地,一目了然”;“对工作流程干扰最小”;以及“保护患者隐私”——和三个设计特点——“地理布局”、“患者级警报”和“实时汇总数据”开发了一个仪表板。根据急诊科拥挤概念模型的吞吐量因素选择了评估仪表板的项目。此外,还使用系统可用性量表(SUS)、态势感知指数以及我们根据态势感知评级技术的结构创建的问卷对急诊科医生和护士进行了调查。

结果

急诊科仪表板的第一个版本于2013年成功推出,此后由于急诊科的地理变化以及为提高可用性而进行的修改,它经历了3次重大修订。共有52名急诊科工作人员参与了调查。仪表板的平均SUS得分为67.6分,表明其可用性为“尚可至良好”。参与者还报告称,该仪表板提供了高效的“注意力支持”(4.15分)、“复杂性呈现”(4.02分)、“变异性呈现”(3.96分)、“信息质量”(3.94分)和“熟悉度”(3.94分)。然而,“注意力分散”的评分为2.25分。

结论

我们开发了一种实时自主的急诊科仪表板,并成功使用了5年,得到了用户的良好评价。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b820/6284143/764e042805c6/mhealth_v6i11e10666_fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b820/6284143/1fa8064ed453/mhealth_v6i11e10666_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b820/6284143/517abc760d22/mhealth_v6i11e10666_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b820/6284143/89c3ec42aa0d/mhealth_v6i11e10666_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b820/6284143/764e042805c6/mhealth_v6i11e10666_fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b820/6284143/1fa8064ed453/mhealth_v6i11e10666_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b820/6284143/517abc760d22/mhealth_v6i11e10666_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b820/6284143/89c3ec42aa0d/mhealth_v6i11e10666_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b820/6284143/764e042805c6/mhealth_v6i11e10666_fig4.jpg

相似文献

1
A Real-Time Autonomous Dashboard for the Emergency Department: 5-Year Case Study.急诊科实时自主仪表板:5年案例研究
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2018 Nov 22;6(11):e10666. doi: 10.2196/10666.
2
Developing an emergency department crowding dashboard: A design science approach.开发急诊科拥挤情况仪表盘:一种设计科学方法。
Int Emerg Nurs. 2018 Jul;39:68-76. doi: 10.1016/j.ienj.2017.08.001. Epub 2017 Aug 31.
3
Usability Evaluation of Dashboards: A Systematic Literature Review of Tools.仪表盘的可用性评估:工具的系统文献回顾
Biomed Res Int. 2023 Feb 22;2023:9990933. doi: 10.1155/2023/9990933. eCollection 2023.
4
Involving end-users in the design of an audit and feedback intervention in the emergency department setting - a mixed methods study.让终端用户参与急诊科环境下的审核与反馈干预设计——一项混合方法研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Apr 29;19(1):270. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4084-3.
5
Usability Testing of an Interactive Dashboard for Surgical Quality Improvement in a Large Congenital Heart Center.大型先心病中心用于外科质量改进的交互式仪表板的可用性测试。
Appl Clin Inform. 2019 Oct;10(5):859-869. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1698466. Epub 2019 Nov 13.
6
Emergency Department Quality Dashboard; a Systematic Review of Performance Indicators, Functionalities, and Challenges.急诊科质量仪表盘;对绩效指标、功能及挑战的系统评价
Arch Acad Emerg Med. 2021 Jun 17;9(1):e47. doi: 10.22037/aaem.v9i1.1230. eCollection 2021.
7
Developing a Data Dashboard Framework for Population Health Surveillance: Widening Access to Clinical Trial Findings.开发用于人群健康监测的数据仪表板框架:扩大对临床试验结果的获取。
JMIR Form Res. 2019 Apr 4;3(2):e11342. doi: 10.2196/11342.
8
Usability and Acceptability of Clinical Dashboards in Aged Care: Systematic Review.老年护理中临床仪表板的可用性与可接受性:系统评价
JMIR Aging. 2023 Jun 19;6:e42274. doi: 10.2196/42274.
9
Usability Evaluation and Implementation of a Health Information Technology Dashboard of Evidence-Based Quality Indicators.基于证据的质量指标的健康信息技术仪表盘的可用性评估与实施
Comput Inform Nurs. 2017 Jun;35(6):281-288. doi: 10.1097/CIN.0000000000000325.
10
The Solutions in Health Analytics for Rural Equity Across the Northwest (SHARE-NW) Dashboard for Health Equity in Rural Public Health: Usability Evaluation.健康分析解决方案助力西北农村公平(SHARE-NW)农村公共卫生公平仪表板:可用性评估。
JMIR Hum Factors. 2024 Jun 5;11:e51666. doi: 10.2196/51666.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessment of Emergency Medicine Residents' Situational Awareness and Perception of Patient Safety Culture in the Emergency Department.急诊科急诊医学住院医师的情境意识及对患者安全文化认知的评估
AEM Educ Train. 2025 Jun 12;9(3):e70060. doi: 10.1002/aet2.70060. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
Development, Implementation, and Evaluation Methods for Dashboards in Health Care: Scoping Review.医疗保健中仪表板的开发、实施和评估方法:范围审查
JMIR Med Inform. 2024 Dec 10;12:e59828. doi: 10.2196/59828.
3
Impact of visualising healthcare quality performance: a systematic review.

本文引用的文献

1
Interface, information, interaction: a narrative review of design and functional requirements for clinical decision support.界面、信息、交互:临床决策支持的设计和功能需求的叙述性综述。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2018 May 1;25(5):585-592. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocx118.
2
Effect of emergency physician burnout on patient waiting times.急诊医师职业倦怠对患者候诊时间的影响。
Intern Emerg Med. 2018 Apr;13(3):421-428. doi: 10.1007/s11739-017-1706-9. Epub 2017 Jul 4.
3
Dashboard visualizations: Supporting real-time throughput decision-making.
可视化医疗质量绩效的影响:系统评价。
BMJ Open. 2024 Nov 2;14(11):e083620. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-083620.
4
Usability Evaluation of Dashboards: A Systematic Literature Review of Tools.仪表盘的可用性评估:工具的系统文献回顾
Biomed Res Int. 2023 Feb 22;2023:9990933. doi: 10.1155/2023/9990933. eCollection 2023.
5
Development of a health information system to promote emergency care pathways: A participatory design study.开发促进急诊护理路径的健康信息系统:一项参与式设计研究。
Digit Health. 2022 Dec 26;8:20552076221145856. doi: 10.1177/20552076221145856. eCollection 2022 Jan-Dec.
6
Requirements and challenges of hospital dashboards: a systematic literature review.医院仪表盘的需求与挑战:系统文献回顾
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2022 Nov 8;22(1):287. doi: 10.1186/s12911-022-02037-8.
7
Design and Implementation of a Comprehensive AI Dashboard for Real-Time Prediction of Adverse Prognosis of ED Patients.用于急诊患者不良预后实时预测的综合人工智能仪表盘的设计与实现
Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Aug 9;10(8):1498. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10081498.
8
Development of a low-dimensional model to predict admissions from triage at a pediatric emergency department.开发一种低维模型以预测儿科急诊科分诊后的住院情况。
J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open. 2022 Jul 15;3(4):e12779. doi: 10.1002/emp2.12779. eCollection 2022 Aug.
9
Integration of an Intensive Care Unit Visualization Dashboard (i-Dashboard) as a Platform to Facilitate Multidisciplinary Rounds: Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial.将重症监护病房可视化仪表板(i-Dashboard)集成作为促进多学科查房的平台:整群随机对照试验。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 May 13;24(5):e35981. doi: 10.2196/35981.
10
Toward a Learning Health Care System: A Systematic Review and Evidence-Based Conceptual Framework for Implementation of Clinical Analytics in a Digital Hospital.迈向学习型医疗保健系统:数字医院中临床分析实施的系统评价与循证概念框架
Appl Clin Inform. 2022 Mar;13(2):339-354. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1743243. Epub 2022 Apr 6.
仪表板可视化:支持实时吞吐量决策。
J Biomed Inform. 2017 Jul;71:211-221. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2017.05.024. Epub 2017 Jun 1.
4
Improving emergency department patient flow.改善急诊科患者流程。
Clin Exp Emerg Med. 2016 Jun 30;3(2):63-68. doi: 10.15441/ceem.16.127. eCollection 2016 Jun.
5
The ED-inpatient dashboard: Uniting emergency and inpatient clinicians to improve the efficiency and quality of care for patients requiring emergency admission to hospital.急诊科-住院部信息平台:联合急诊科和住院部临床医生,提高需紧急入院患者的护理效率和质量。
Emerg Med Australas. 2017 Jun;29(3):363-366. doi: 10.1111/1742-6723.12661. Epub 2016 Sep 4.
6
Managing Quality and Safety in Real Time? Evidence from an Interview Study.实时管理质量与安全?一项访谈研究的证据
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2016;228:23-7.
7
Emergency Department Crowding Disparity: a Nationwide Cross-Sectional Study.急诊科拥挤差异:一项全国性横断面研究。
J Korean Med Sci. 2016 Aug;31(8):1331-6. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2016.31.8.1331. Epub 2016 May 18.
8
Control of an Outbreak of Middle East Respiratory Syndrome in a Tertiary Hospital in Korea.韩国一家三级医院中东呼吸综合征疫情的控制。
Ann Intern Med. 2016 Jul 19;165(2):87-93. doi: 10.7326/M15-2495. Epub 2016 May 31.
9
Study of the regulatory effect of acupuncture on rotation-induced gastric dysrhythmia in rabbits.针刺对家兔旋转诱发胃节律失常调节作用的研究。
World J Gastroenterol. 1997 Mar 15;3(1):54-5. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v3.i1.54.
10
ED crowding and the outcomes of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.急诊室拥挤与院外心脏骤停的结局
Am J Emerg Med. 2015 Nov;33(11):1659-64. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2015.08.002. Epub 2015 Aug 5.