Suppr超能文献

评估科学传播。

Evaluating science communication.

机构信息

Department of Engineering and Public Policy, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213;

Institute for Politics and Strategy, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213.

出版信息

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Apr 16;116(16):7670-7675. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1805863115. Epub 2018 Nov 26.

Abstract

Effective science communication requires assembling scientists with knowledge relevant to decision makers, translating that knowledge into useful terms, establishing trusted two-way communication channels, evaluating the process, and refining it as needed. [National Research Council (2017)] surveys the scientific foundations for accomplishing these tasks, the research agenda for improving them, and the essential collaborative relations with decision makers and communication professionals. Recognizing the complexity of the science, the decisions, and the communication processes, the report calls for a systems approach. This perspective offers an approach to creating such systems by adapting scientific methods to the practical constraints of science communication. It considers staffing (are the right people involved?), internal collaboration (are they talking to one another?), and external collaboration (are they talking to other stakeholders?). It focuses on contexts where the goal of science communication is helping people to make autonomous choices rather than promoting specific behaviors (e.g., voter turnout, vaccination rates, energy consumption). The approach is illustrated with research in two domains: decisions about preventing sexual assault and responding to pandemic disease.

摘要

有效的科学传播需要将具有决策者相关知识的科学家聚集在一起,将这些知识转化为有用的术语,建立可信赖的双向沟通渠道,评估该过程,并根据需要进行改进。[美国国家研究委员会(2017 年)]调查了完成这些任务的科学基础、改进这些任务的研究议程以及与决策者和传播专业人士的必要合作关系。该报告认识到科学、决策和沟通过程的复杂性,因此呼吁采用系统方法。这种观点提供了一种通过将科学方法适用于科学传播的实际限制来创建此类系统的方法。它考虑了人员配备(是否涉及合适的人员?)、内部协作(他们是否在相互交流?)和外部协作(他们是否在与其他利益相关者交流?)。它侧重于科学传播的目标是帮助人们做出自主选择而不是促进特定行为(例如,选民投票率、疫苗接种率、能源消耗)的情况。该方法通过两个领域的研究进行了说明:防止性侵犯和应对大流行病的决策。

相似文献

1
Evaluating science communication.评估科学传播。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Apr 16;116(16):7670-7675. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1805863115. Epub 2018 Nov 26.
2
The sciences of science communication.科学传播学。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Aug 20;110 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):14033-9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1213273110. Epub 2013 Aug 13.
4
Communicating scientific uncertainty.传达科学的不确定性。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Sep 16;111 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):13664-71. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1317504111. Epub 2014 Sep 15.
5
Bridging the gap between science and decision making.弥合科学与决策之间的差距。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Aug 20;110 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):14055-61. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1213532110. Epub 2013 Aug 12.
6
Bringing values and deliberation to science communication.将价值观和深思熟虑融入科学传播。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Aug 20;110 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):14081-7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1212740110. Epub 2013 Aug 12.
7
Risk management frameworks for human health and environmental risks.人类健康与环境风险的风险管理框架。
J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev. 2003 Nov-Dec;6(6):569-720. doi: 10.1080/10937400390208608.
8
[The role of information in public health decision-making].[信息在公共卫生决策中的作用]
Sante Publique. 2008 Jul-Aug;20(4):387-94. doi: 10.3917/spub.084.0387.
9
Assessing what to address in science communication.评估科学传播中需要解决的问题。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Aug 20;110 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):14062-8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1212729110. Epub 2013 Aug 13.

引用本文的文献

2
Promoting engagement with quality communication in social media.促进社交媒体中优质沟通的参与度。
PLoS One. 2022 Oct 13;17(10):e0275534. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0275534. eCollection 2022.
8
Mathematical Models for COVID-19 Pandemic: A Comparative Analysis.COVID-19大流行的数学模型:比较分析
J Indian Inst Sci. 2020;100(4):793-807. doi: 10.1007/s41745-020-00200-6. Epub 2020 Oct 30.
9
The Evolving Field of Risk Communication.风险沟通领域的发展演进。
Risk Anal. 2020 Nov;40(S1):2240-2262. doi: 10.1111/risa.13615. Epub 2020 Oct 20.

本文引用的文献

2
On the future of transportation in an era of automated and autonomous vehicles.论自动化和自动驾驶汽车时代的交通未来。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Apr 16;116(16):7684-7691. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1805770115. Epub 2019 Jan 14.
5
Challenges In Understanding And Respecting Patients' Preferences.理解和尊重患者偏好面临的挑战。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2017 Jul 1;36(7):1252-1257. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2017.0177.
10
The realities of risk-cost-benefit analysis.风险-成本-效益分析的现实情况。
Science. 2015 Oct 30;350(6260):aaa6516. doi: 10.1126/science.aaa6516.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验