School of Human Movement and Nutrition Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia.
School of Psychology, Deakin University, Burwood, VIC 3125, Australia.
Br J Nutr. 2019 Sep 14;122(5):527-541. doi: 10.1017/S000711451800363X. Epub 2019 Jan 31.
Cancer-related fatigue (CRF) is one of the most commonly reported disease- and treatment-related side effects that impede quality of life. This systematic review and meta-analysis describes the effects of nutrition therapy on CRF and quality of life in people with cancer and cancer survivors. Studies were identified from four electronic databases until September 2017. Eligibility criteria included randomised trials in cancer patients and survivors; any structured dietary intervention describing quantities, proportions, varieties and frequencies of food groups or energy and macronutrient consumption targets; and measures of CRF and quality of life. Standardised mean differences (SMD) were pooled using random-effects models. The American Dietetic Association's Evidence Analysis Library Quality Checklist for Primary Research was used to evaluate the methodological quality and risk of bias. A total of sixteen papers, of fifteen interventions, were included, comprising 1290 participants. Nutrition therapy offered no definitive effect on CRF (SMD 0·18 (95 % CI -0·02, 0·39)) or quality of life (SMD 0·07 (95 % CI -0·10, 0·24)). Preliminary evidence indicates plant-based dietary pattern nutrition therapy may benefit CRF (SMD 0·62 (95 % CI 0·10, 1·15)). Interventions using the patient-generated subjective global assessment tool and prescribing hypermetabolic energy and protein requirements may improve quality of life. However, the heterogeneity seen in study design, nutrition therapies, quality-of-life measures and cancer types impede definitive dietary recommendations to improve quality of life for cancer patients. There is insufficient evidence to determine the optimal nutrition care plan to improve CRF and/or quality of life in cancer patients and survivors.
癌症相关性乏力(CRF)是最常见的与疾病和治疗相关的副作用之一,它会影响生活质量。本系统评价和荟萃分析描述了营养疗法对癌症患者和癌症幸存者的 CRF 和生活质量的影响。研究从四个电子数据库中进行了检索,截至 2017 年 9 月。纳入标准包括癌症患者和幸存者的随机试验;任何描述食物种类、比例、种类和频率或能量和宏量营养素摄入目标的结构化饮食干预;以及 CRF 和生活质量的测量。使用随机效应模型汇总标准化均数差值(SMD)。采用美国饮食协会的初级研究证据分析库质量检查表来评估方法学质量和偏倚风险。共纳入 16 篇论文,涉及 15 项干预措施,共 1290 名参与者。营养疗法对 CRF(SMD 0·18(95 % CI -0·02, 0·39))或生活质量(SMD 0·07(95 % CI -0·10, 0·24))没有明确的影响。初步证据表明,植物性饮食模式营养疗法可能对 CRF 有益(SMD 0·62(95 % CI 0·10, 1·15))。使用患者生成的主观整体评估工具和规定高代谢能量和蛋白质需求的干预措施可能会改善生活质量。然而,研究设计、营养疗法、生活质量测量和癌症类型的异质性阻碍了明确的饮食建议,以改善癌症患者的生活质量。目前尚无足够的证据来确定最佳的营养护理计划,以改善癌症患者和幸存者的 CRF 和/或生活质量。