a School of Engineering and Technology , Savonia University of Applied Sciences , Kuopio , Finland.
b Department of Environmental and Biological Sciences , University of Eastern Finland , Kuopio , Finland.
J Occup Environ Hyg. 2019 Mar;16(3):258-271. doi: 10.1080/15459624.2018.1557784. Epub 2019 Mar 21.
The aim of this study was to measure the concentrations of gaseous and particulate contaminants originated from additive manufacturing operations and post-processes in an occupational setting when plastics were used as feedstock materials. Secondary aims were to evaluate the concentration levels based on proposed exposure limits and target values and to propose means to reduce exposure to contaminants released in additive manufacturing processes. Volatile organic compounds were sampled with Tenax TA adsorption tubes and analyzed with a thermo desorption gas chromatography-mass spectrometry instrument. Carbonyl compounds were sampled with DNPH-Silica cartridges and analyzed with a high-performance liquid chromatography device. Particles were measured with P-Trak instrument and indoor air quality was sampled with IAQ-Calc instrument. Dust mass concentrations were measured simultaneously with a DustTrak DRX instrument and IOM-samplers. Particle concentrations were highest (2070-81 890 #/cm mean) during manufacturing with methods where plastics were thermally processed. Total volatile organic compounds concentrations, in contrast, were low (113-317 µg/m mean) during manufacturing with such methods, and vat photopolymerization. However, total volatile organic compounds concentrations of material jetting and multi jet fusion methods were higher (1,114-2,496 µg/m mean), perhaps because of material and binder spraying, where part of the spray can become aerosolized. Chemical treatment of manufactured objects was found to be a severe volatile organic compounds source as well. Formaldehyde was detected in low concentrations (3-40 µg/m) in all methods except for material jetting method, in addition to several other carbonyl compounds. Notable dust concentrations (1.4-9.1 mg/m) were detected only during post-processing of powder bed fusion and multi jet fusion manufactured objects. Indoor air quality parameters were not found to be notably impacted by manufacturing operations. Only low concentrations (below 2 ppm) of CO were detected during several manufacturing processes. All studied additive manufacturing operations emitted potentially harmful contaminants into their environments, which should be considered in occupational additive manufacturing and workplace design. According to the measured contaminant levels it is possible that adverse additive manufacturing related health effects may occur among exposed workers.
本研究的目的是测量在职业环境中使用塑料作为原料时,添加剂制造操作和后处理过程中产生的气态和颗粒污染物的浓度。次要目的是根据建议的暴露限值和目标值评估浓度水平,并提出减少添加剂制造过程中释放的污染物暴露的方法。挥发性有机化合物用 Tenax TA 吸附管采样,用热解吸气相色谱-质谱仪分析。羰基化合物用 DNPH-硅胶管采样,用高效液相色谱仪分析。颗粒物用 P-Trak 仪器测量,室内空气质量用 IAQ-Calc 仪器采样。粉尘质量浓度同时用 DustTrak DRX 仪器和 IOM 采样器测量。在用热加工方法制造塑料时,颗粒物浓度最高(平均 2070-81890#/cm)。相比之下,在用这些方法和 vat 光聚合制造时,总挥发性有机化合物浓度较低(平均 113-317μg/m)。然而,材料喷射和多喷射融合方法的总挥发性有机化合物浓度较高(平均 1114-2496μg/m),这可能是由于材料和粘合剂的喷涂,其中一部分喷雾会变成气溶胶。制造物体的化学处理也是挥发性有机化合物的严重来源。除了材料喷射方法外,所有方法中都检测到低浓度的甲醛(3-40μg/m)和几种其他羰基化合物。只有在粉末床融合和多喷射融合制造物体的后处理过程中,才检测到显著的粉尘浓度(1.4-9.1mg/m)。室内空气质量参数未发现受制造作业显著影响。在几个制造过程中只检测到低浓度(低于 2ppm)的 CO。所有研究的添加剂制造操作都向其环境中排放了潜在有害的污染物,这在职业添加剂制造和工作场所设计中应予以考虑。根据测量的污染物水平,暴露工人可能会出现与添加剂制造相关的不良健康影响。