• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

分诊准确性及未来方向综述。

A review of triage accuracy and future direction.

作者信息

Tam Hon Lon, Chung Siu Fung, Lou Chi Kin

机构信息

Kiang Wu Nursing College of Macau, Est. Repouso No. 35, R/C, Macau, S.A.R., China.

Flinders University, Sturt Road, Bedford Park, 5042, Adelaide, South Australia.

出版信息

BMC Emerg Med. 2018 Dec 20;18(1):58. doi: 10.1186/s12873-018-0215-0.

DOI:10.1186/s12873-018-0215-0
PMID:30572841
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6302512/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In the emergency department, it is important to identify and prioritize who requires an urgent intervention in a short time. Triage helps recognize the urgency among patients. An accurate triage decision helps patients receive the emergency service in the most appropriate time. Various triage systems have been developed and verified to assist healthcare providers to make accurate triage decisions. The triage accuracy can represent the quality of emergency service, but there is a lack of review studies addressing this topic.

METHODS

A literature search was conducted in four electronic databases where 'emergency nursing' and 'triage accuracy' were used as keywords. Studies published from 2008 January to 2018 August were included as potential subjects. Nine studies were included in this review after the inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied.

RESULTS

Written case scenarios and retrospective review were commonly used to examine the triage accuracy. The triage accuracy from studies was in moderate level. The single-center studies which held better results than those from multi-center studies revealed the need of triage training and consistent training between emergency departments.

CONCLUSIONS

Regular refresher triage training, collaboration between emergency departments and continuous monitoring were necessary to strengthen the use of triage systems and improve nurse's triage performance.

摘要

背景

在急诊科,重要的是要在短时间内识别出需要紧急干预的患者并确定其优先级。分诊有助于识别患者的紧急程度。准确的分诊决策有助于患者在最合适的时间获得紧急服务。已经开发并验证了各种分诊系统,以协助医疗服务提供者做出准确的分诊决策。分诊准确性可以代表紧急服务的质量,但缺乏针对该主题的综述研究。

方法

在四个电子数据库中进行文献检索,以“急诊护理”和“分诊准确性”作为关键词。纳入2008年1月至2018年8月发表的研究作为潜在研究对象。应用纳入和排除标准后,本综述纳入了九项研究。

结果

书面病例场景和回顾性审查常用于检查分诊准确性。研究中的分诊准确性处于中等水平。单中心研究的结果优于多中心研究,这表明需要进行分诊培训以及急诊科之间的持续培训。

结论

定期进行分诊复习培训、急诊科之间的协作以及持续监测对于加强分诊系统的使用和提高护士的分诊表现是必要的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5de7/6302512/c7b640b5bce0/12873_2018_215_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5de7/6302512/c7b640b5bce0/12873_2018_215_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5de7/6302512/c7b640b5bce0/12873_2018_215_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
A review of triage accuracy and future direction.分诊准确性及未来方向综述。
BMC Emerg Med. 2018 Dec 20;18(1):58. doi: 10.1186/s12873-018-0215-0.
2
Assessing sensitivity and specificity of the Manchester Triage System in the evaluation of acute coronary syndrome in adult patients in emergency care: a systematic review protocol.评估曼彻斯特分诊系统在急诊护理中评估成年急性冠状动脉综合征患者时的敏感性和特异性:一项系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Nov;13(11):64-73. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2213.
3
The impact of adult trauma triage training on decision-making skills and accuracy of triage decision at emergency departments in Malaysia: A randomized control trial.马来西亚成人创伤分诊培训对急诊科分诊决策技能和准确性的影响:一项随机对照试验。
Int Emerg Nurs. 2020 Jul;51:100889. doi: 10.1016/j.ienj.2020.100889. Epub 2020 Jul 1.
4
The accuracy and consistency of rural, remote and outpost triage nurse decision making in one Western Australia Country Health Service Region.西澳大利亚乡村卫生服务区农村、偏远及前哨分诊护士决策的准确性与一致性。
Australas Emerg Nurs J. 2015 Nov;18(4):227-33. doi: 10.1016/j.aenj.2015.05.002. Epub 2015 Jul 26.
5
Accuracy and interrater reliability of paediatric emergency department triage.儿科急诊科分诊的准确性及评估者间信度
Emerg Med Australas. 2015 Oct;27(5):447-52. doi: 10.1111/1742-6723.12455. Epub 2015 Aug 13.
6
Triage in emergency departments: national survey.急诊科的分诊:全国性调查。
J Clin Nurs. 2005 Oct;14(9):1067-74. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2005.01191.x.
7
Enhancing triage accuracy: The influence of nursing education on risk prediction.提高分诊准确率:护理教育对风险预测的影响。
Int Emerg Nurs. 2024 Aug;75:101486. doi: 10.1016/j.ienj.2024.101486. Epub 2024 Jun 26.
8
Comparison of triage assessments among pediatric registered nurses and pediatric emergency physicians.儿科注册护士与儿科急诊医生分诊评估的比较。
Acad Emerg Med. 2002 Dec;9(12):1397-401. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2002.tb01608.x.
9
Differences in priorities assigned to patients by triage nurses and by consultant physicians in accident and emergency departments.急诊部门分诊护士和会诊医生对患者的优先级分配差异。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 1993 Aug;47(4):312-5. doi: 10.1136/jech.47.4.312.
10
Reliability and validity of three international triage systems within a private health-care group in the Middle East.在中东的一家私营医疗机构中,三种国际分诊系统的信度和效度。
Int Emerg Nurs. 2020 Jul;51:100870. doi: 10.1016/j.ienj.2020.100870. Epub 2020 Apr 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Development and internal validation of an AI-based emergency triage model for predicting critical outcomes in emergency department.用于预测急诊科危急结局的基于人工智能的急诊分诊模型的开发与内部验证
Sci Rep. 2025 Aug 25;15(1):31212. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-17180-1.
2
Prognostic value of frailty across age groups in emergency department patients aged 65 and above.65岁及以上急诊科患者中衰弱在各年龄组的预后价值。
BMC Geriatr. 2025 Jul 2;25(1):445. doi: 10.1186/s12877-025-06092-4.
3
Adult Triage in the Emergency Department: Introducing a Multi-Layer Triage System.

本文引用的文献

1
Accuracy of emergency department triage using the Emergency Severity Index and independent predictors of under-triage and over-triage in Brazil: a retrospective cohort analysis.在巴西使用急诊严重程度指数进行急诊科分诊的准确性以及分诊不足和分诊过度的独立预测因素:一项回顾性队列分析。
Int J Emerg Med. 2018 Jan 15;11(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s12245-017-0161-8.
2
Accuracy and Reliability of Emergency Department Triage Using the Emergency Severity Index: An International Multicenter Assessment.运用急诊严重指数进行急诊科分诊的准确性和可靠性:一项国际多中心评估。
Ann Emerg Med. 2018 May;71(5):581-587.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2017.09.036. Epub 2017 Nov 24.
3
急诊科成人分诊:引入多层分诊系统。
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 May 6;13(9):1070. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13091070.
4
Emergency Department Triage Accuracy and Delays in Care for High-Risk Conditions.急诊科对高危病症的分诊准确性及护理延误情况
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 May 1;8(5):e258498. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.8498.
5
Association between emergency department to intensive care units time and in-hospital mortality: an analysis of the MIMIC-IV database.急诊科至重症监护病房时间与院内死亡率之间的关联:MIMIC-IV数据库分析
BMJ Open. 2025 Apr 5;15(4):e090011. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-090011.
6
An instrument as an action against the blind spot of acute medical care in general practice - a systematic review.一种针对全科医疗中急性医疗盲点的工具——系统评价。
BMC Prim Care. 2025 Mar 8;26(1):67. doi: 10.1186/s12875-025-02749-6.
7
Safety and accuracy of digitally supported primary and secondary urgent care telephone triage in England: an observational study using routine data.英国数字化支持的初级和二级紧急护理电话分诊的安全性与准确性:一项使用常规数据的观察性研究
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2025 Feb 3;25(1):52. doi: 10.1186/s12911-025-02888-x.
8
Effect of triage training on nurses with Emergency severity index and Australian triage scale: Α quasi-experimental study.分诊培训对采用急诊严重程度指数和澳大利亚分诊量表的护士的影响:一项准实验研究。
AIMS Public Health. 2024 Oct 9;11(4):1049-1070. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2024054. eCollection 2024.
9
Implementation facilitators and barriers of person and family-centred emergency care.以患者和家庭为中心的急诊护理的实施促进因素和障碍
Health SA. 2024 Nov 6;29:2789. doi: 10.4102/hsag.v29i0.2789. eCollection 2024.
10
Characteristics of a revised quick sequential organ failure assessment score (RqSOFA) to predict in-hospital mortality of patients visiting the emergency department via ambulance: an observational cohort study.用于预测通过救护车送往急诊科患者院内死亡率的修订版快速序贯器官衰竭评估评分(RqSOFA)的特征:一项观察性队列研究
Intern Emerg Med. 2024 Dec 5. doi: 10.1007/s11739-024-03833-y.
Improving Triage: The Essential Information to Compare Different Approaches.
改进分诊:比较不同方法的关键信息。
Clin Nurse Spec. 2017 Nov/Dec;31(6):297. doi: 10.1097/NUR.0000000000000338.
4
Machine-Learning-Based Electronic Triage More Accurately Differentiates Patients With Respect to Clinical Outcomes Compared With the Emergency Severity Index.基于机器学习的电子分诊在区分患者临床结局方面比急诊严重指数更准确。
Ann Emerg Med. 2018 May;71(5):565-574.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2017.08.005. Epub 2017 Sep 6.
5
Improving Triage Accuracy: A Staff Development Approach.提高分诊准确性:一种员工发展方法。
Clin Nurse Spec. 2017 May/Jun;31(3):145-148. doi: 10.1097/NUR.0000000000000291.
6
The accuracy of nurse performance of the triage process in a tertiary hospital emergency department in Gauteng Province, South Africa.南非豪登省一家三级医院急诊科护士分诊流程的执行准确性。
S Afr Med J. 2017 Feb 27;107(3):243-247. doi: 10.7196/SAMJ.2017.v107i3.11118.
7
Reliability and validity of emergency department triage tools in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review.中低收入国家急诊科分诊工具的信度和效度:系统评价。
Eur J Emerg Med. 2018 Jun;25(3):154-160. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0000000000000445.
8
The reliability of the Manchester Triage System (MTS): a meta-analysis.曼彻斯特分诊系统(MTS)的可靠性:一项荟萃分析。
J Evid Based Med. 2017 May;10(2):129-135. doi: 10.1111/jebm.12231.
9
Nurses' accuracy and self-perceived ability using the Emergency Severity Index triage tool: a cross-sectional study in four Swiss hospitals.护士使用急诊严重程度指数分诊工具的准确性及自我认知能力:瑞士四家医院的横断面研究
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2015 Aug 28;23:62. doi: 10.1186/s13049-015-0142-y.
10
The reliability of the Australasian Triage Scale: a meta-analysis.澳大利亚分诊量表的可靠性:一项荟萃分析。
World J Emerg Med. 2015;6(2):94-9. doi: 10.5847/wjem.j.1920-8642.2015.02.002.