Suppr超能文献

伊朗患者对药品说明书的态度及其可获取性调查。

An investigation on patient attitudes toward package inserts and their accessibility in Iran.

作者信息

Ahmadi Parisa, Badri Shirin S, Zargarzadeh Amir H

机构信息

Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacy Practice, Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.

出版信息

J Res Med Sci. 2018 Nov 28;23:100. doi: 10.4103/jrms.JRMS_67_18. eCollection 2018.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Package inserts (PIs) can be a source of information for patients, especially when clinicians do not provide adequate consultations to the patients. Therefore, for the first time, we investigated the state of PIs in Iran and evaluated patients' attitude toward PI.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this descriptive study, conducted in a major teaching pharmacy in Isfahan, Iran, in 2016, 100 patients who presented a prescription were interviewed randomly and all medications in their medication bags were examined. The main outcome measures were whether or not the dispensed medications were accompanied by a PI and the behavior of patients in reading these PIs.

RESULTS

From the 237 medication items investigated, 129 (54.4%) were dispensed with a PI. Eighty-four percent of patients read the PIs and only 19% stated reading a non-Farsi PI. The level of education was the only significant factor related to reading the PI ( = 0.02). Reading the side effects was the main reason for reading the PI (64%). PIs were considered useful by 83% while 25% kept PIs as a source of drug information. Experience of fear to take the medication after reading the PI was reported by 47%.

CONCLUSION

About half of medications were dispensed along with the PI. Although the majority of patients report reading the PIs and consider them useful, confidence in using the medicine may be diminished after reading the PI. Patients with higher education read the PIs the most.

摘要

背景

药品说明书(PIs)可以成为患者的信息来源,尤其是当临床医生未向患者提供充分咨询时。因此,我们首次调查了伊朗药品说明书的状况,并评估了患者对药品说明书的态度。

材料与方法

在这项描述性研究中,2016年于伊朗伊斯法罕的一家主要教学药房进行,随机采访了100名前来取药的患者,并检查了他们药袋中的所有药物。主要观察指标是所配发的药物是否附有药品说明书以及患者阅读这些药品说明书的行为。

结果

在调查的237种药物中,129种(54.4%)配发了药品说明书。84%的患者阅读了药品说明书,只有19%的患者表示阅读过非波斯语的药品说明书。教育程度是与阅读药品说明书相关的唯一显著因素(P = 0.02)。阅读副作用是阅读药品说明书的主要原因(64%)。83%的患者认为药品说明书有用,而25%的患者将药品说明书留作药物信息来源。47%的患者报告在阅读药品说明书后有害怕服药的经历。

结论

约一半的药物配发了药品说明书。尽管大多数患者报告阅读了药品说明书并认为其有用,但阅读药品说明书后对用药的信心可能会降低。受教育程度较高的患者阅读药品说明书的比例最高。

相似文献

2
Evaluation of Medication Package Inserts in Iran.伊朗药品说明书评估
J Res Pharm Pract. 2019 Apr-Jun;8(2):45-51. doi: 10.4103/jrpp.JRPP_18_32.
6
Evaluation of medication package inserts in Saudi Arabia.沙特阿拉伯药品说明书的评估。
Drug Healthc Patient Saf. 2012;4:33-8. doi: 10.2147/DHPS.S29402. Epub 2012 Mar 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Need of hours for drug disposal information with package inserts.通过药品说明书获取药品处置信息所需的小时数。
J Family Med Prim Care. 2024 May;13(5):2168-2169. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1772_23. Epub 2024 May 24.

本文引用的文献

7
Sources of drug information for patients with chronic conditions in Alexandria, Egypt.埃及亚历山大慢性病患者的药物信息来源。
Int J Pharm Pract. 2011 Feb;19(1):13-20. doi: 10.1111/j.2042-7174.2010.00069.x. Epub 2010 Nov 4.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验