• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

2017 年美洲登革热的下降:多种假说的讨论。

The decline of dengue in the Americas in 2017: discussion of multiple hypotheses.

机构信息

Communicable Diseases and Environmental Determinants of Health Department, PAHO, Washington, DC, USA.

Robert Stempel College of Public Health and Social Work, Florida International University, Miami, FL, USA.

出版信息

Trop Med Int Health. 2019 Apr;24(4):442-453. doi: 10.1111/tmi.13200. Epub 2019 Jan 28.

DOI:10.1111/tmi.13200
PMID:30624838
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6850595/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Since the 1980s, dengue incidence has increased 30-fold. However, in 2017, there was a noticeable reduction in reported dengue incidence cases within the Americas, including severe and fatal cases. Understanding the mechanism underlying dengue's incidence and decline in the Americas is vital for public health planning. We aimed to provide plausible explanations for the decline in 2017.

METHODS

An expert panel of representatives from scientific and academic institutions, Ministry of Health officials from Latin America and PAHO/WHO staff met in October 2017 to propose hypotheses. The meeting employed six moderated plenary discussions in which participants reviewed epidemiological evidence, suggested explanatory hypotheses, offered their expert opinions on each and developed a consensus.

RESULTS

The expert group established that in 2017, there was a generalised decreased incidence, severity and number of deaths due to dengue in the Americas, accompanied by a reduction in reported cases of both Zika and chikungunya virus infections, with no change in distribution among age groups affected. This decline was determined to be unlikely due to changes in epidemiological surveillance systems, as similar designs of surveillance systems exist across the region. Although sudden surveillance disruption is possible at a country or regional level, it is unlikely to occur in all countries simultaneously. Retrospective modelling with epidemiological, immunological and entomological information is needed. Host or immunological factors may have influenced the decline in dengue cases at the population level through immunity; however, herd protection requires additional evidence. Uncertainty remains regarding the effect on the outcome of sequential infections of different dengue virus (DENV) types and Zika virus (ZIKV), and vice versa. Future studies were recommended that examine the epidemiological effect of prior DENV infection on Zika incidence and severity, the epidemiological effect of prior Zika virus infection on dengue incidence and severity, immune correlates based on new-generation ELISA assays, and impact of prior DENV/other arbovirus infection on ZIKV immune response in relation to number of infections and the duration of antibodies in relation to interval of protection. Follow-up studies should also investigate whether increased vector control intensification activities contributed to the decline in transmission of one or more of these arboviruses. Additionally, proposed studies should focus on the potential role of vector competence when simultaneously exposed to various arboviruses, and on entomological surveillance and its impact on circulating vector species, with a goal of applying specific measures that mitigate seasonal occurrence or outbreaks.

CONCLUSIONS

Multifactorial events may have accounted for the decline in dengue seen in 2017. Differing elements might explain the reduction in dengue including elements of immunity, increased vector control, and even vector and\or viruses changes or adaptations. Most of the results of this expert consensus group meeting are hypothetical and based on limited evidence. Further studies are needed.

摘要

目的

自 20 世纪 80 年代以来,登革热发病率增长了 30 倍。然而,2017 年美洲报告的登革热发病率病例,包括严重和致命病例,均出现显著下降。了解登革热在美洲发病率下降的机制对于公共卫生规划至关重要。我们旨在为 2017 年的下降提供合理的解释。

方法

来自科学和学术机构的专家小组代表、拉丁美洲卫生部官员和泛美卫生组织/世界卫生组织的工作人员于 2017 年 10 月举行会议,提出假设。会议采用了六次专题小组讨论,与会者审查了流行病学证据,提出了解释性假设,对每个假设发表了专家意见,并达成了共识。

结果

专家组确定,2017 年,美洲的登革热发病率、严重程度和死亡人数普遍下降,同时寨卡病毒和基孔肯雅热病毒感染的报告病例也有所减少,而受影响年龄组的分布没有变化。这种下降不太可能是由于流行病学监测系统的变化所致,因为该地区存在类似的监测系统设计。尽管在国家或区域一级突然中断监测是可能的,但不太可能同时发生在所有国家。需要使用流行病学、免疫学和昆虫学信息进行回顾性建模。宿主或免疫因素可能通过免疫在人群水平上影响登革热病例的下降;然而,群体保护还需要更多的证据。关于不同登革热病毒(DENV)类型和寨卡病毒(ZIKV)以及反之亦然的连续感染对结果的影响仍存在不确定性。建议进行未来的研究,以检验先前登革热感染对寨卡病毒发病率和严重程度的流行病学影响、先前寨卡病毒感染对登革热发病率和严重程度的流行病学影响、基于新一代 ELISA 检测的免疫相关性,以及先前 DENV/其他虫媒病毒感染对寨卡病毒免疫反应的影响,包括感染次数和抗体持续时间与保护间隔的关系。后续研究还应调查增加病媒控制强化活动是否有助于减少这些虫媒病毒中的一种或多种的传播。此外,拟议的研究应侧重于当同时接触多种虫媒病毒时媒介的易感性的潜在作用,以及昆虫学监测及其对传播媒介物种的影响,目的是采取具体措施减轻季节性发生或暴发的情况。

结论

多种因素可能导致 2017 年登革热的下降。不同的因素可能解释了登革热的减少,包括免疫因素、增加病媒控制,甚至媒介和/或病毒的变化或适应。专家组会议的大多数结果都是假设性的,并且基于有限的证据。还需要进一步的研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0cec/6850595/f7ac10294160/TMI-24-442-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0cec/6850595/c142a55598a8/TMI-24-442-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0cec/6850595/f7ac10294160/TMI-24-442-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0cec/6850595/c142a55598a8/TMI-24-442-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0cec/6850595/f7ac10294160/TMI-24-442-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
The decline of dengue in the Americas in 2017: discussion of multiple hypotheses.2017 年美洲登革热的下降:多种假说的讨论。
Trop Med Int Health. 2019 Apr;24(4):442-453. doi: 10.1111/tmi.13200. Epub 2019 Jan 28.
2
Changes in the dynamics of dengue incidence in South and Central America are possibly due to cross-population immunity after Zika virus epidemics.南美洲和中美洲登革热发病率动态的变化可能是由于寨卡病毒流行后人群交叉免疫所致。
Trop Med Int Health. 2021 Mar;26(3):272-280. doi: 10.1111/tmi.13526. Epub 2020 Nov 30.
3
Vector competence of Aedes aegypti from Havana, Cuba, for dengue virus type 1, chikungunya, and Zika viruses.古巴哈瓦那埃及伊蚊对登革热病毒 1 型、基孔肯雅热病毒和寨卡病毒的媒介效能。
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2020 Dec 3;14(12):e0008941. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0008941. eCollection 2020 Dec.
4
Monitoring arbovirus in Thailand: Surveillance of dengue, chikungunya and zika virus, with a focus on coinfections.泰国虫媒病毒监测:登革热、基孔肯雅热和寨卡病毒监测,重点关注混合感染。
Acta Trop. 2018 Dec;188:244-250. doi: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2018.09.012. Epub 2018 Sep 21.
5
Dengue, chikungunya and zika virus coinfection: results of the national surveillance during the zika epidemic in Colombia.登革热、基孔肯雅热和寨卡病毒合并感染:哥伦比亚寨卡疫情期间全国监测结果。
Epidemiol Infect. 2019 Jan;147:e77. doi: 10.1017/S095026881800359X.
6
Arbovirus investigation in patients from Mato Grosso during Zika and Chikungunya virus introdution in Brazil, 2015-2016.2015 - 2016年巴西寨卡病毒和基孔肯雅病毒传入期间,对来自马托格罗索州患者的虫媒病毒调查。
Acta Trop. 2019 Feb;190:395-402. doi: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2018.12.019. Epub 2018 Dec 12.
7
Climatic and socio-economic factors supporting the co-circulation of dengue, Zika and chikungunya in three different ecosystems in Colombia.支持登革热、寨卡和基孔肯雅热在哥伦比亚三个不同生态系统中共同流行的气候和社会经济因素。
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2021 Mar 11;15(3):e0009259. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0009259. eCollection 2021 Mar.
8
Seroprevalence, spatial dispersion and factors associated with flavivirus and chikungunha infection in a risk area: a population-based seroprevalence study in Brazil.在一个风险地区,与黄病毒和基孔肯雅热感染相关的血清流行率、空间分布和因素:巴西的一项基于人群的血清流行率研究。
BMC Infect Dis. 2020 Nov 24;20(1):881. doi: 10.1186/s12879-020-05611-5.
9
Epidemiology of Dengue, Chikungunya, and Zika Virus Disease in U.S. States and Territories, 2017.2017 年美国各州和领地登革热、基孔肯雅热和 Zika 病毒病的流行病学。
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2019 Oct;101(4):884-890. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.19-0309.
10
The origins of dengue and chikungunya viruses in Ecuador following increased migration from Venezuela and Colombia.厄瓜多尔因委内瑞拉和哥伦比亚移民增加而出现登革热和基孔肯雅热病毒。
BMC Evol Biol. 2020 Feb 19;20(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s12862-020-1596-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Dengue Virus Serotype 3 Origins and Genetic Dynamics, Jamaica.登革病毒 3 型的起源与遗传动态,牙买加。
Emerg Infect Dis. 2024 Oct;30(10):2149-2154. doi: 10.3201/eid3010.240170. Epub 2024 Aug 27.
2
Original Article: Decline of notified dengue infections in Indonesia in 2017: Discussion of the possible determinants.原创文章:2017年印度尼西亚登革热感染报告病例数下降:对可能的决定因素的探讨。
Narra J. 2021 Apr;1(1):e23. doi: 10.52225/narraj.v1i1.23. Epub 2021 Apr 1.
3
Shifting patterns of dengue three years after Zika virus emergence in Brazil.

本文引用的文献

1
Prior dengue virus infection and risk of Zika: A pediatric cohort in Nicaragua.既往登革病毒感染与寨卡病毒风险:尼加拉瓜儿科队列研究。
PLoS Med. 2019 Jan 22;16(1):e1002726. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002726. eCollection 2019 Jan.
2
Integrated Aedes management for the control of Aedes-borne diseases.病媒蚊综合管理以控制病媒蚊传播疾病。
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2018 Dec 6;12(12):e0006845. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0006845. eCollection 2018 Dec.
3
Dengue in Brazil in 2017: what happened?2017年巴西的登革热疫情:发生了什么?
巴西寨卡病毒出现三年后登革热流行模式的转变。
Nat Commun. 2024 Jan 20;15(1):632. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-44799-x.
4
Spatiotemporal and meteorological relationships in dengue transmission in the Dominican Republic, 2015-2019.2015 - 2019年多米尼加共和国登革热传播中的时空与气象关系
Trop Med Health. 2023 Jun 2;51(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s41182-023-00517-9.
5
Using compartmental models and Particle Swarm Optimization to assess Dengue basic reproduction number for the Republic of Panama in the 1999-2022 period.使用 compartmental 模型和粒子群优化算法评估 1999 年至 2022 年期间巴拿马共和国的登革热基本再生数。
Heliyon. 2023 Apr 13;9(4):e15424. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15424. eCollection 2023 Apr.
6
Epidemiological profile of arboviruses in two different scenarios: dengue circulation vs. dengue, chikungunya and Zika co-circulation.虫媒病毒在两种不同情况下的流行病学特征:登革热传播与登革热、基孔肯雅热和寨卡病毒共同传播。
BMC Infect Dis. 2023 Mar 22;23(1):177. doi: 10.1186/s12879-023-08139-6.
7
Dengue, chikungunya and Zika virus infections among Dutch travellers to Suriname: a prospective study during the introduction of chikungunya and Zika virus, 2014 to 2017.2014 年至 2017 年期间,在基孔肯雅热和寨卡病毒传入期间,前往苏里南的荷兰旅行者中的登革热、基孔肯雅热和寨卡病毒感染:一项前瞻性研究。
Euro Surveill. 2023 Jan;28(2). doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2023.28.2.2200344.
8
Association of Midgut Bacteria and Their Metabolic Pathways with Zika Infection and Insecticide Resistance in Colombian Populations.中肠细菌及其代谢途径与哥伦比亚人群寨卡病毒感染和杀虫剂抗性的关联。
Viruses. 2022 Oct 6;14(10):2197. doi: 10.3390/v14102197.
9
Re-emergence of arbovirus diseases in the State of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: The role of simultaneous viral circulation between 2014 and 2019.巴西里约热内卢州虫媒病毒病的再度出现:2014年至2019年间病毒同时传播的作用。
One Health. 2022 Aug 10;15:100427. doi: 10.1016/j.onehlt.2022.100427. eCollection 2022 Dec.
10
Epidemiology of Indigenous Dengue Cases in Zhejiang Province, Southeast China.中国东南部浙江省的本土登革热病例的流行病学研究。
Front Public Health. 2022 Apr 14;10:857911. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.857911. eCollection 2022.
Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo. 2018 Aug 20;60:e43. doi: 10.1590/S1678-9946201860043.
4
Differences in Transmission and Disease Severity Between 2 Successive Waves of Chikungunya.登革热病毒在连续两波疫情中的传播和疾病严重程度的差异。
Clin Infect Dis. 2018 Nov 13;67(11):1760-1767. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciy356.
5
Longitudinal Analysis of Antibody Cross-neutralization Following Zika Virus and Dengue Virus Infection in Asia and the Americas.亚洲和美洲寨卡病毒和登革热病毒感染后的抗体交叉中和的纵向分析。
J Infect Dis. 2018 Jul 13;218(4):536-545. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiy164.
6
Does immunity after Zika virus infection cross-protect against dengue?感染寨卡病毒后产生的免疫力能否对登革热起到交叉保护作用?
Lancet Glob Health. 2018 Feb;6(2):e140-e141. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(17)30496-5.
7
Antibody-dependent enhancement of severe dengue disease in humans.抗体依赖增强作用在人类严重登革热疾病中的表现
Science. 2017 Nov 17;358(6365):929-932. doi: 10.1126/science.aan6836. Epub 2017 Nov 2.
8
Viral Load and Cytokine Response Profile Does Not Support Antibody-Dependent Enhancement in Dengue-Primed Zika Virus-Infected Patients.病毒载量和细胞因子反应谱不支持登革热病毒感染的 Zika 病毒患者的抗体依赖性增强。
Clin Infect Dis. 2017 Oct 15;65(8):1260-1265. doi: 10.1093/cid/cix558.
9
Prior Dengue Virus Exposure Shapes T Cell Immunity to Zika Virus in Humans.先前登革热病毒感染会影响人体对寨卡病毒的 T 细胞免疫反应。
J Virol. 2017 Nov 30;91(24). doi: 10.1128/JVI.01469-17. Print 2017 Dec 15.
10
Zika virus activates de novo and cross-reactive memory B cell responses in dengue-experienced donors.寨卡病毒在曾感染过登革热的献血者体内激活了从头产生的和交叉反应性记忆B细胞反应。
Sci Immunol. 2017 Aug 18;2(14). doi: 10.1126/sciimmunol.aan6809.