• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

电刺激引导下的硬膜外分娩镇痛:一项随机前瞻性研究。

Electric stimulation-guided epidural analgesia for vaginal delivery: A randomized prospective study.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology and Pain medicine, Korea University Medical Center, Guro Hospital, Guro-Gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2019 Jan 11;14(1):e0209967. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0209967. eCollection 2019.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0209967
PMID:30633755
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6329494/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The failure rate of epidural anesthesia using the loss of resistance technique is 13-23%.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the efficacy of epidural electric stimulation-guided epidural analgesia in vaginal delivery.

STUDY DESIGN

An open label randomized prospective study.

METHODS

Laboring women were randomized to two groups: epidural catheter insertion using only a loss of resistance technique or a loss of resistance technique with confirmation by electric stimulation. Catheters in both groups were initially tested with 3 ml of 1% lidocaine and those with any evidence of motor blockade were considered intrathecal. Sensory blockade and an 11 point numerical rating score for pain were assessed 30 minutes after administration of an epidural bolus of 10 ml of 0.22% ropivacaine with fentanyl. Successful epidural analgesia was defined as a decrease of 2 or more in the pain score and a bilateral L1-T10 sensory blockade.

RESULTS

Thirty-one patients were randomized to each group. The first 20 patients in each group were enrolled in a pilot study and were also included in the final analysis. One patient in the electric stimulation group was excluded owing to dural puncture by the Tuohy needle. One patient in each group demonstrated motor blockade after test dose and were considered failures. The number (% (95% confidence interval)) of successful cases were 29 out of 30 (97% (85, 100%)) in the electric stimulation group and 24 out of 31 (77% (61, 89%)) in the loss of resistance group (P = 0.053). However, analysis of only patients with absence of motor blockade revealed that 29 out of 29 (100% (92, 100%)) patients in the electric stimulation group and 24 of 29 (80% (63, 91%)) patients in the loss of resistance group had adequate analgesia (P = 0.024).

CONCLUSIONS

Although limited by lack of blinding, small study size and inclusion of pilot study data, this study suggests epidural electric stimulation improves the success rate of subsequent labor analgesia.

摘要

背景

采用阻力丧失技术的硬膜外麻醉失败率为 13-23%。

目的

研究硬膜外电刺激引导硬膜外分娩镇痛的效果。

研究设计

开放标签随机前瞻性研究。

方法

将临产妇女随机分为两组:仅使用阻力丧失技术插入硬膜外导管或使用阻力丧失技术加电刺激确认。两组的导管均先用 3ml 1%利多卡因进行测试,有任何运动阻滞迹象的导管被认为是蛛网膜下腔的。在给予 10ml 0.22%罗哌卡因加芬太尼硬膜外负荷量 30 分钟后,评估感觉阻滞和疼痛的 11 点数字评分。成功的硬膜外镇痛定义为疼痛评分降低 2 分或更多,以及双侧 L1-T10 感觉阻滞。

结果

每组随机分配 31 名患者。每组的前 20 名患者进行了一项试点研究,并也包括在最终分析中。电刺激组的 1 名患者因 Tuohy 针刺破硬脊膜而被排除。每组各有 1 名患者在测试剂量后出现运动阻滞,被认为是失败病例。电刺激组成功的病例数为 30 例中的 29 例(97%(85%,100%)),阻力丧失组为 31 例中的 24 例(77%(61%,89%))(P=0.053)。然而,仅分析无运动阻滞的患者,电刺激组的 29 例患者(100%(92%,100%))和阻力丧失组的 24 例患者(80%(63%,91%))均有足够的镇痛效果(P=0.024)。

结论

尽管受到缺乏盲法、研究规模小以及包括试点研究数据的限制,本研究表明硬膜外电刺激可提高随后分娩镇痛的成功率。

相似文献

1
Electric stimulation-guided epidural analgesia for vaginal delivery: A randomized prospective study.电刺激引导下的硬膜外分娩镇痛:一项随机前瞻性研究。
PLoS One. 2019 Jan 11;14(1):e0209967. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0209967. eCollection 2019.
2
Labor Analgesia Onset With Dural Puncture Epidural Versus Traditional Epidural Using a 26-Gauge Whitacre Needle and 0.125% Bupivacaine Bolus: A Randomized Clinical Trial.硬膜外穿刺时使用 26 号 Whitacre 针和 0.125%布比卡因推注行分娩镇痛:一项随机临床试验。
Anesth Analg. 2018 Feb;126(2):545-551. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000002129.
3
Programmed Intermittent Epidural Bolus for Labor Analgesia During First Stage of Labor: A Biased-Coin Up-and-Down Sequential Allocation Trial to Determine the Optimum Interval Time Between Boluses of a Fixed Volume of 10 mL of Bupivacaine 0.0625% With Fentanyl 2 μg/mL.分娩第一产程中用于分娩镇痛的程序化间歇性硬膜外推注:一项偏倚硬币上下顺序分配试验,以确定固定体积10 mL、浓度0.0625%的布比卡因与2 μg/mL芬太尼推注之间的最佳间隔时间。
Anesth Analg. 2017 Feb;124(2):537-541. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001655.
4
Sacral sensory blockade from 27-gauge pencil-point dural puncture epidural analgesia or epidural analgesia in laboring nulliparous parturients: a randomized controlled trial.27 号穿刺针笔尖式硬脊膜外腔阻滞或硬脊膜外腔阻滞用于分娩的初产妇的骶神经阻滞:一项随机对照试验。
Int J Obstet Anesth. 2024 Nov;60:104217. doi: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2024.104217. Epub 2024 Jun 14.
5
Epidural analgesia during labor--0.5% lidocaine with fentanyl vs. 0.08% ropivacaine with fentanyl.分娩期间的硬膜外镇痛——0.5%利多卡因联合芬太尼与0.08%罗哌卡因联合芬太尼的比较。
Middle East J Anaesthesiol. 2010 Feb;20(4):521-7.
6
Low-dose intrathecal local anesthetic does not increase the threshold current for the epidural stimulation test: a prospective observational trial of neuraxial analgesia in labouring women.低剂量鞘内局部麻醉药不会增加硬膜外刺激试验的阈值电流:一项关于分娩期妇女椎管内镇痛的前瞻性观察性试验。
Can J Anaesth. 2015 Mar;62(3):265-70. doi: 10.1007/s12630-014-0291-x. Epub 2014 Dec 11.
7
The epidural electric stimulation test does not predict local anesthetic spread or consumption in labour epidural analgesia.硬膜外电刺激试验不能预测分娩时硬膜外镇痛中局部麻醉药的扩散或消耗。
Can J Anaesth. 2013 Apr;60(4):393-8. doi: 10.1007/s12630-013-9887-9. Epub 2013 Jan 24.
8
Continuous epidural infusion vs programmed intermittent epidural bolus for labour analgesia: a prospective, controlled, before-and-after cohort study of labour outcomes.连续硬膜外输注与程控间歇硬膜外推注用于分娩镇痛的前瞻性对照前后队列研究:分娩结局的比较。
Br J Anaesth. 2018 Aug;121(2):432-437. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2018.03.038. Epub 2018 Jun 8.
9
Combined spinal-epidural analgesia for labor pain: best timing of epidural infusion following spinal dose.联合腰麻-硬膜外镇痛用于分娩镇痛:腰麻给药后硬膜外输注的最佳时机
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2009 Mar;279(3):329-34. doi: 10.1007/s00404-008-0725-1. Epub 2008 Jul 16.
10
Dural Puncture Epidural Technique Improves Labor Analgesia Quality With Fewer Side Effects Compared With Epidural and Combined Spinal Epidural Techniques: A Randomized Clinical Trial.与硬膜外麻醉和腰麻-硬膜外联合麻醉技术相比,硬膜穿刺硬膜外技术可提高分娩镇痛质量且副作用更少:一项随机临床试验。
Anesth Analg. 2017 Feb;124(2):560-569. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001798.

引用本文的文献

1
Equality, Diversity and Inclusion characteristics measured or reported in randomised trials of intrapartum interventions: A Scoping Review.分娩期干预随机试验中测量或报告的平等、多样性和包容性特征:一项范围综述
HRB Open Res. 2025 Mar 7;7:78. doi: 10.12688/hrbopenres.14012.1. eCollection 2024.
2
Confirming identification of the epidural space: a systematic review of electric stimulation, pressure waveform analysis, and ultrasound and a meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy in acute pain.确认硬膜外腔位置:电刺激、压力波形分析以及超声的系统评价和急性疼痛诊断准确性的荟萃分析
J Clin Monit Comput. 2023 Dec;37(6):1593-1605. doi: 10.1007/s10877-023-01056-8. Epub 2023 Jul 22.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Epidural catheter design: history, innovations, and clinical implications.硬膜外导管设计:历史、创新及临床意义
Anesthesiology. 2014 Jul;121(1):9-17. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000239.
2
Epidural failure rate using a standardised definition.采用标准化定义的硬膜外失败率。
Int J Obstet Anesth. 2013 Nov;22(4):310-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2013.04.013. Epub 2013 Aug 6.
3
Epidural analgesia for labor: Current techniques.分娩硬膜外镇痛:当前技术
Efficacy of electrical stimulation on epidural anesthesia for cesarean section: a randomized controlled trial.
电刺激对剖宫产硬膜外麻醉效果的影响:一项随机对照试验。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2020 Jun 10;20(1):146. doi: 10.1186/s12871-020-01063-1.
Local Reg Anesth. 2010;3:143-53. doi: 10.2147/LRA.S10237. Epub 2010 Dec 8.
4
Minimum current requirement for confirming the localization of an epiradicular catheter placement.确认根尖定位导管放置位置所需的最小电流要求。
Korean J Anesthesiol. 2012 Sep;63(3):238-44. doi: 10.4097/kjae.2012.63.3.238. Epub 2012 Sep 14.
5
Failed epidural: causes and management.硬膜外阻滞失败:原因及处理。
Br J Anaesth. 2012 Aug;109(2):144-54. doi: 10.1093/bja/aes214. Epub 2012 Jun 26.
6
Minimum current requirements for epidural stimulation test confirmation of epidural and intrathecal catheter placement.硬膜外刺激试验确认硬膜外和鞘内导管置管的最低电流要求。
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2009 Nov-Dec;34(6):575-7. doi: 10.1097/aap.0b013e3181bfbe1e.
7
Inadequate pain relief with labor epidurals: a multivariate analysis of associated factors.分娩硬膜外镇痛镇痛效果不佳:相关因素的多变量分析
Int J Obstet Anesth. 2009 Jan;18(1):10-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2007.10.008. Epub 2008 Nov 28.
8
A prospective audit of regional anaesthesia failure in 5080 Caesarean sections.对5080例剖宫产术中区域麻醉失败的前瞻性审计。
Anaesthesia. 2008 Aug;63(8):822-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2008.05499.x. Epub 2008 Jun 28.
9
Techniques for identifying the epidural space: a survey of practice amongst anaesthetists in the UK.识别硬膜外腔的技术:英国麻醉医生的实践调查
Anaesthesia. 2006 Apr;61(4):370-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2006.04534.x.
10
Incidence and characteristics of failures in obstetric neuraxial analgesia and anesthesia: a retrospective analysis of 19,259 deliveries.产科椎管内镇痛与麻醉失败的发生率及特征:对19259例分娩的回顾性分析
Int J Obstet Anesth. 2004 Oct;13(4):227-33. doi: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2004.04.008.