Department of Family Medicine, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, Anyang, Gyeonggi-do 14068, Korea.
Department of Medical Nutrition, Kyung Hee University, Yongin, Gyeonggi-do 17104, Korea.
Nutrients. 2019 Jan 10;11(1):137. doi: 10.3390/nu11010137.
This study aimed to develop a multidisciplinary lifestyle intervention program targeted at children and adolescents with moderate to severe obesity, and assess the additional effects of exercise intervention when compared to usual care. Overall, the 103 enrolled participants were ≥85th percentile of age and sex-specific body mass index (BMI). Participants were divided into groups that received 16 weeks of either usual care or exercise intervention. The BMI -score of the overall completers decreased by about 0.05 after the 16-week intervention ( = 0.02). After the intervention, only the exercise group had a significantly lower BMI -score than the baseline score by about 0.1 ( = 0.03), but no significant group by time interaction effects were observed. At the 16-week follow-up, significant group by time interaction effects were observed in percentage body fat (%BF) (β = -1.52, 95%CI = -2.58⁻-0.45), lean body mass (LM) (β = 1.20, 95%CI = 0.12⁻2.29), diastolic blood pressure (β = -5.24, 95%CI = -9.66⁻-0.83), high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (β = -1.67, 95%CI = -2.77⁻-1.01), and wall sit test score (β = 50.74, 95%CI = 32.30⁻69.18). We developed a moderate-intensity intervention program that can be sustained in the real-world setting and is practically applicable to both moderate and severe obesity. After interventions, the exercise group had lower %BF and cardiometabolic risk markers, and higher LM and leg muscle strength compared to the usual care group.
本研究旨在为患有中重度肥胖的儿童和青少年制定一项多学科生活方式干预计划,并评估与常规护理相比,运动干预的附加效果。总体而言,103 名入组参与者的年龄和性别特异性体重指数(BMI)均≥第 85 百分位数。参与者分为接受 16 周常规护理或运动干预的两组。经过 16 周的干预,所有完成者的 BMI 评分平均下降了约 0.05( = 0.02)。干预后,仅运动组的 BMI 评分显著低于基线评分,约为 0.1( = 0.03),但未观察到组间时间交互作用的显著影响。在 16 周的随访中,观察到体脂百分比(%BF)(β = -1.52,95%CI = -2.58⁻-0.45)、瘦体重(LM)(β = 1.20,95%CI = 0.12⁻2.29)、舒张压(β = -5.24,95%CI = -9.66⁻-0.83)、高敏 C 反应蛋白(β = -1.67,95%CI = -2.77⁻-1.01)和靠墙静蹲测试评分(β = 50.74,95%CI = 32.30⁻69.18)存在显著的组间时间交互作用。我们开发了一种中等强度的干预方案,该方案可在现实环境中持续实施,并且对中度和重度肥胖均具有实际应用价值。干预后,与常规护理组相比,运动组的 %BF 和心血管代谢风险标志物更低,LM 和腿部肌肉力量更高。