Suppr超能文献

木屑采样:存在大颗粒时个人采样器的现场评估

Wood dust sampling: field evaluation of personal samplers when large particles are present.

作者信息

Lee Taekhee, Harper Martin, Slaven James E, Lee Kiyoung, Rando Roy J, Maples Elizabeth H

机构信息

Exposure Assessment Branch, Health Effects Laboratory Division, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Morgantown, WV 26505, USA.

出版信息

Ann Occup Hyg. 2011 Mar;55(2):180-91. doi: 10.1093/annhyg/meq075. Epub 2010 Oct 29.

Abstract

Recent recommendations for wood dust sampling include sampling according to the inhalable convention of International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 7708 (1995) Air quality--particle size fraction definitions for health-related sampling. However, a specific sampling device is not mandated, and while several samplers have laboratory performance approaching theoretical for an 'inhalable' sampler, the best choice of sampler for wood dust is not clear. A side-by-side field study was considered the most practical test of samplers as laboratory performance tests consider overall performance based on a wider range of particle sizes than are commonly encountered in the wood products industry. Seven companies in the wood products industry of the Southeast USA (MS, KY, AL, and WV) participated in this study. The products included hardwood flooring, engineered hardwood flooring, door skins, shutter blinds, kitchen cabinets, plywood, and veneer. The samplers selected were 37-mm closed-face cassette with ACCU-CAP™, Button, CIP10-I, GSP, and Institute of Occupational Medicine. Approximately 30 of each possible pairwise combination of samplers were collected as personal sample sets. Paired samplers of the same type were used to calculate environmental variance that was then used to determine the number of pairs of samples necessary to detect any difference at a specified level of confidence. Total valid sample number was 888 (444 valid pairs). The mass concentration of wood dust ranged from 0.02 to 195 mg m(-3). Geometric mean (geometric standard deviation) and arithmetic mean (standard deviation) of wood dust were 0.98 mg m(-3) (3.06) and 2.12 mg m(-3) (7.74), respectively. One percent of the samples exceeded 15 mg m(-3), 6% exceeded 5 mg m(-3), and 48% exceeded 1 mg m(-3). The number of collected pairs is generally appropriate to detect a 35% difference when outliers (negative mass loadings) are removed. Statistical evaluation of the nonsimilar sampler pair results produced a finding of no significant difference between any pairing of sampler type. A practical consideration for sampling in the USA is that the ACCU-CAP™ is similar to the sampler currently used by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration for purposes of demonstrating compliance with its permissible exposure limit for wood dust, which is the same as for Particles Not Otherwise Regulated, also known as inert dust or nuisance dust (Method PV2121).

摘要

近期关于木尘采样的建议包括按照国际标准化组织(ISO)7708(1995)《空气质量——与健康相关采样的粒径分级定义》中的可吸入标准进行采样。然而,并未强制规定使用特定的采样设备,虽然有几种采样器在实验室中的性能接近“可吸入”采样器的理论性能,但对于木尘采样而言,最佳采样器的选择尚不清楚。一项并行现场研究被认为是对采样器最实际的测试,因为实验室性能测试所考虑的整体性能是基于比木制品行业中常见粒径范围更广泛的粒径。美国东南部(密西西比州、肯塔基州、阿拉巴马州和西弗吉尼亚州)木制品行业的七家公司参与了这项研究。产品包括硬木地板、强化木地板、门皮、百叶窗、厨房橱柜、胶合板和单板。所选的采样器有带ACCU-CAP™的37毫米封闭式采样盒、纽扣式采样器、CIP10-I采样器、GSP采样器和职业医学研究所采样器。每种可能的采样器两两组合大约采集30组作为个人样本集。使用相同类型的配对采样器来计算环境方差,然后用于确定在指定置信水平下检测任何差异所需的样本对数。有效样本总数为888(有效对数为444)。木尘的质量浓度范围为0.02至195毫克/立方米。木尘的几何均值(几何标准差)和算术均值(标准差)分别为0.98毫克/立方米(3.06)和2.12毫克/立方米(7.74)。1%的样本超过15毫克/立方米,6%超过5毫克/立方米,48%超过1毫克/立方米。当去除异常值(负质量负荷)时,所采集的样本对数通常足以检测出35%的差异。对不同采样器配对结果的统计评估表明任何采样器类型的配对之间均无显著差异。在美国进行采样时的一个实际考虑因素是,ACCU-CAP™与职业安全与健康管理局目前用于证明符合其木尘允许暴露限值的采样器类似,该限值与未另作规定的颗粒物(也称为惰性粉尘或 nuisance 粉尘,方法PV2121)相同。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc28/3037778/b33c245a8350/annhygmeq075f01_3c.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验