Department of Plant Pathology, The Ohio State University, Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center, Wooster 44691.
Department of Plant Pathology, University of Kentucky Research and Education Center, Princeton 42445.
Plant Dis. 2018 Dec;102(12):2602-2615. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-02-18-0211-RE. Epub 2018 Oct 8.
Field trials were conducted in 17 U.S. states to evaluate the effects of quinone outside inhibitor (QoI) and demethylation inhibitor (DMI) fungicide programs on Fusarium head blight index (IND) and deoxynivalenol (DON) toxin in wheat. Four DMI-only treatments applied at Feekes 10.5.1, five QoI-only treatments applied between Feekes 9 or Feekes 10.5, three QoI+DMI mixtures applied at Feekes 10.5, and three treatments consisting of a QoI at Feekes 9 followed by a DMI at Feekes 10.5.1 were evaluated. Network meta-analytical models were fitted to log-transformed mean IND and DON data and estimated contrasts of log means were used to obtain estimates of mean percent controls relative to the nontreated check as measures of efficacy. Results from the meta-analyses were also used to assess the risk of DON increase in future trials. DMI at Feekes 10.5.1 were the most effective programs against IND and DON and the least likely to increase DON in future trials. QoI-only programs increased mean DON over the nontreated checks and were the most likely to do so in future trials, particularly when applied at Feekes 10.5. The effects of QoI+DMI combinations depended on the active ingredients and whether the two were applied as a mixture at heading or sequentially. Following a Feekes 9 QoI application with a Feekes 10.5.1 application of a DMI reduced the negative effect of the QoI on DON but was not sufficient to achieve the efficacy of the Feekes 10.5.1 DMI-only treatments. Our results suggest that one must be prudent when using QoI treatments under moderate to high risk of FHB, particularly where the QoI is used without an effective DMI applied in combination or in sequence.
在美国 17 个州进行了田间试验,以评估醌外抑制剂(QoI)和脱甲基抑制剂(DMI)杀菌剂方案对小麦赤霉病指数(IND)和脱氧雪腐镰刀菌烯醇(DON)毒素的影响。在 Feekes 10.5.1 期施用了 4 种仅 DMI 处理,在 Feekes 9 或 Feekes 10.5 期之间施用了 5 种仅 QoI 处理,在 Feekes 10.5 期施用了 3 种 QoI+DMI 混合物处理,在 Feekes 9 期施用了一种 QoI,在 Feekes 10.5.1 期施用了一种 DMI,对这 3 种处理进行了评估。对对数转换的平均 IND 和 DON 数据进行了网络荟萃分析模型拟合,并使用对数均值对比估计值来获得相对于未处理对照的平均百分控制率估计值,作为功效的衡量标准。荟萃分析的结果还用于评估未来试验中 DON 增加的风险。在 Feekes 10.5.1 期施用 DMI 是防治 IND 和 DON 最有效的方案,也是未来试验中最不可能增加 DON 的方案。仅 QoI 方案会使平均 DON 高于未处理对照,而且在未来试验中最有可能这样做,尤其是在 Feekes 10.5 期施用时。QoI+DMI 组合的效果取决于活性成分以及这两种成分是在抽穗期混合施用还是顺序施用。在 Feekes 9 期施用 QoI 后,在 Feekes 10.5.1 期施用 DMI,可降低 QoI 对 DON 的负面影响,但不足以达到仅在 Feekes 10.5.1 期施用 DMI 的效果。我们的研究结果表明,在赤霉病中度至高度风险的情况下,必须谨慎使用 QoI 处理,特别是在 QoI 单独使用而没有与有效 DMI 联合或序贯使用的情况下。