• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

从《纳菲尔德报告》看人类基因组编辑的道德理由

Moral reasons to edit the human genome: picking up from the Nuffield report.

机构信息

Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

J Med Ethics. 2019 Aug;45(8):514-523. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2018-105084. Epub 2019 Jan 24.

DOI:10.1136/medethics-2018-105084
PMID:30679191
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6820147/
Abstract

In July 2018, the Nuffield Council of Bioethics released its long-awaited report on heritable genome editing (HGE). The Nuffield report was notable for finding that HGE could be morally permissible, even in cases of human enhancement. In this paper, we summarise the findings of the Nuffield Council report, critically examine the guiding principles they endorse and suggest ways in which the guiding principles could be strengthened. While we support the approach taken by the Nuffield Council, we argue that detailed consideration of the moral implications of genome editing yields much stronger conclusions than they draw. Rather than being merely 'morally permissible', many instances of genome editing will be moral imperatives.

摘要

2018 年 7 月,英国纳菲尔德生物伦理学理事会发布了其期待已久的关于可遗传基因组编辑的报告。该报告值得注意的是,它发现可遗传基因组编辑在人类增强的情况下也可能在道德上是允许的。在本文中,我们总结了英国纳菲尔德理事会报告的调查结果,批判性地审查了他们认可的指导原则,并提出了加强这些指导原则的方法。虽然我们支持英国纳菲尔德理事会采取的方法,但我们认为,对基因组编辑的道德影响进行详细考虑会得出比他们更有力的结论。许多情况下的基因组编辑将不仅仅是“在道德上是允许的”,而是道德上的必然要求。

相似文献

1
Moral reasons to edit the human genome: picking up from the Nuffield report.从《纳菲尔德报告》看人类基因组编辑的道德理由
J Med Ethics. 2019 Aug;45(8):514-523. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2018-105084. Epub 2019 Jan 24.
2
The Nuffield Council's green light for genome editing human embryos defies fundamental human rights law.英国纳菲尔德生物伦理理事会批准对人类胚胎进行基因编辑,这一行为有违基本人权法。
Bioethics. 2020 Mar;34(3):223-227. doi: 10.1111/bioe.12713. Epub 2020 Jan 13.
3
The moral argument for heritable genome editing requires an inappropriately deterministic view of genetics.从道德角度论证可遗传基因组编辑需要对遗传学采取一种不适当的决定论观点。
J Med Ethics. 2019 Aug;45(8):526-527. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2019-105390. Epub 2019 Mar 12.
4
A critical view on using "life not worth living" in the bioethics of assisted reproduction.辅助生殖的生命伦理学中使用“不值得活的生命”的批判性观点。
Med Health Care Philos. 2024 Jun;27(2):189-203. doi: 10.1007/s11019-023-10191-7. Epub 2024 Feb 16.
5
The ethics of genetic screening: the first report of the Nuffield Council on Bioethics: another personal view.基因筛查的伦理问题:纳菲尔德生物伦理委员会的首份报告:另一种个人观点。
J Med Ethics. 1994 Sep;20(3):185-7. doi: 10.1136/jme.20.3.185.
6
Parental wisdom, empirical blindness, and normative evaluation of prenatal genetic enhancement.父母的智慧、经验性盲目与产前基因增强的规范性评估
J Med Philos. 2011 Jun;36(3):274-95. doi: 10.1093/jmp/jhr012. Epub 2011 May 19.
7
Is selecting better than modifying? An investigation of arguments against germline gene editing as compared to preimplantation genetic diagnosis.选择优于修改吗?与胚胎植入前遗传学诊断相比,对反对种系基因编辑论点的调查。
BMC Med Ethics. 2019 Nov 21;20(1):83. doi: 10.1186/s12910-019-0411-9.
8
Who should fund and control the direction of human behavior genetics? Review of Nuffield Council on Bioethics 2002 report, genetics and human behaviour: the ethical context.谁应该为人类行为遗传学提供资金并控制其研究方向?对英国纳菲尔德生物伦理委员会2002年报告《遗传学与人类行为:伦理背景》的评论。
Genes Brain Behav. 2003 Dec;2(6):321-6; discussion 330-1. doi: 10.1046/j.1601-1848.2003.00032.x.
9
'My child will never initiate Ultimate Harm': an argument against moral enhancement.“我的孩子永远不会主动造成终极伤害”:反对道德增强的一个论据。
J Med Ethics. 2015 Mar;41(3):245-51. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2013-101855. Epub 2014 Apr 19.
10
The 'serious' factor in germline modification.种系编辑的“严重”因素。
J Med Ethics. 2019 Aug;45(8):508-513. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2019-105436. Epub 2019 Jul 20.

引用本文的文献

1
An ethical framework for human genomic enhancement in China.中国人类基因组增强的伦理框架。
Front Genet. 2025 May 14;16:1600829. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2025.1600829. eCollection 2025.
2
Genome Engineering, Chemical Exposure, and the Germline: An Ethical Synthesis.基因组工程、化学物质暴露与生殖系:一种伦理综合论述
Hastings Cent Rep. 2025 Mar;55(2):39-51. doi: 10.1002/hast.4977.
3
Discussions on Human Enhancement Meet Science: A Quantitative Analysis.关于人类增强与科学的讨论:一项定量分析
Sci Eng Ethics. 2025 Feb 5;31(1):6. doi: 10.1007/s11948-025-00531-6.
4
Gene Editing: Developments, Ethical Considerations, and Future Directions.基因编辑:进展、伦理考量及未来方向
J Community Hosp Intern Med Perspect. 2025 Jan 6;15(1):1-4. doi: 10.55729/2000-9666.1445. eCollection 2025.
5
Modular Ontologies for Genetically Modified People and their Bioethical Implications.转基因人类的模块化本体及其生物伦理意义。
Nanoethics. 2024;18(2):9. doi: 10.1007/s11569-024-00459-4. Epub 2024 Aug 19.
6
A critical view on using "life not worth living" in the bioethics of assisted reproduction.辅助生殖的生命伦理学中使用“不值得活的生命”的批判性观点。
Med Health Care Philos. 2024 Jun;27(2):189-203. doi: 10.1007/s11019-023-10191-7. Epub 2024 Feb 16.
7
Precision Genome Editing Techniques in Gene Therapy: Current State and Future Prospects.基因治疗中的精确基因组编辑技术:现状与未来展望。
Curr Gene Ther. 2024;24(5):377-394. doi: 10.2174/0115665232279528240115075352.
8
Towards an appropriate African framework for public engagement with human genome editing: a call to synergistic action.建立一个适合非洲的公众参与人类基因组编辑的框架:呼吁采取协同行动。
Wellcome Open Res. 2023 May 12;7:302. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.18579.2. eCollection 2022.
9
Initial heritable genome editing: mapping a responsible pathway from basic research to the clinic.初始可遗传基因组编辑:从基础研究到临床的负责任途径图谱。
Med Health Care Philos. 2023 Mar;26(1):21-35. doi: 10.1007/s11019-022-10115-x. Epub 2022 Nov 22.
10
Comparison of Metabolites and Gut Microbes between Patients with Ulcerative Colitis and Healthy Individuals for an Integrative Medicine Approach to Ulcerative Colitis-A Pilot Observational Clinical Study (STROBE Compliant).溃疡性结肠炎患者与健康个体之间代谢物和肠道微生物的比较:溃疡性结肠炎中西医结合治疗的一项初步观察性临床研究(符合STROBE标准)
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Aug 15;12(8):1969. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12081969.

本文引用的文献

1
Quantifying the Potential for Future Gene Therapy to Lower Lifetime Risk of Polygenic Late-Onset Diseases.量化未来基因疗法降低多基因迟发性疾病终生风险的潜力。
Int J Mol Sci. 2019 Jul 8;20(13):3352. doi: 10.3390/ijms20133352.
2
The new genetics of intelligence.智力的新遗传学。
Nat Rev Genet. 2018 Mar;19(3):148-159. doi: 10.1038/nrg.2017.104. Epub 2018 Jan 8.
3
The Ethics of Germline Gene Editing.生殖系基因编辑的伦理问题。
J Appl Philos. 2017 Aug;34(4):498-513. doi: 10.1111/japp.12249. Epub 2016 Nov 9.
4
Correction of a pathogenic gene mutation in human embryos.人类胚胎中致病基因突变的纠正。
Nature. 2017 Aug 24;548(7668):413-419. doi: 10.1038/nature23305. Epub 2017 Aug 2.
5
Epigenetic Alterations and Exposure to Air Pollutants: Protocol for a Birth Cohort Study to Evaluate the Association Between Adverse Birth Outcomes and Global DNA Methylation.表观遗传改变与空气污染暴露:一项出生队列研究方案,以评估不良出生结局与全基因组DNA甲基化之间的关联
JMIR Res Protoc. 2017 Feb 23;6(2):e29. doi: 10.2196/resprot.7114.
6
Developing and evaluating polygenic risk prediction models for stratified disease prevention.开发和评估用于分层疾病预防的多基因风险预测模型。
Nat Rev Genet. 2016 Jul;17(7):392-406. doi: 10.1038/nrg.2016.27. Epub 2016 May 3.
7
Can IVF influence human evolution?体外受精会影响人类进化吗?
Hum Reprod. 2016 Jul;31(7):1397-402. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dew089. Epub 2016 Apr 19.
8
Mutation and Human Exceptionalism: Our Future Genetic Load.突变与人类例外论:我们未来的基因负荷。
Genetics. 2016 Mar;202(3):869-75. doi: 10.1534/genetics.115.180471.
9
The evolution of blood-spot newborn screening.血斑新生儿筛查的演变。
Transl Pediatr. 2014 Apr;3(2):63-70. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2224-4336.2014.03.08.
10
In Genes We Trust: Germline Engineering, Eugenics, and the Future of the Human Genome.我们相信基因:生殖系工程、优生学与人类基因组的未来。
J Med Philos. 2015 Dec;40(6):669-95. doi: 10.1093/jmp/jhv025. Epub 2015 Oct 15.