Department of Chemistry & Biochemistry, University of North Carolina at Greensboro, Greensboro, North Carolina, USA.
Nat Prod Rep. 2019 Aug 14;36(8):1196-1221. doi: 10.1039/c8np00065d.
Covering: up to the end of 2018 Dietary supplements, which include botanical (plant-based) natural products, constitute a multi-billion-dollar industry in the US. Regulation and quality control for this industry is an ongoing challenge. While there is general agreement that rigorous scientific studies are needed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of botanical natural products used by consumers, researchers conducting such studies face a unique set of challenges. Botanical natural products are inherently complex mixtures, with composition that differs depending on myriad factors including variability in genetics, cultivation conditions, and processing methods. Unfortunately, many studies of botanical natural products are carried out with poorly characterized study material, such that the results are irreproducible and difficult to interpret. This review provides recommended approaches for addressing the critical questions that researchers must address prior to in vitro or in vivo (including clinical) evaluation of botanical natural products. We describe selection and authentication of botanical material and identification of key biologically active compounds, and compare state-of-the-art methodologies such as untargeted metabolomics with more traditional targeted methods of characterization. The topics are chosen to be of maximal relevance to researchers, and are reviewed critically with commentary as to which approaches are most practical and useful and what common pitfalls should be avoided.
截至 2018 年底,膳食补充剂包括植物(基于植物)天然产品,在美国构成了数十亿美元的产业。该行业的监管和质量控制是一个持续存在的挑战。虽然人们普遍认为需要严格的科学研究来评估消费者使用的植物天然产品的安全性和有效性,但进行此类研究的研究人员面临着一组独特的挑战。植物天然产品本质上是复杂的混合物,其成分因包括遗传、种植条件和加工方法在内的无数因素而异。不幸的是,许多植物天然产品的研究都是用特征描述不佳的研究材料进行的,因此结果不可重现,难以解释。本综述提供了建议的方法,用于解决研究人员在体外或体内(包括临床)评估植物天然产品之前必须解决的关键问题。我们描述了植物材料的选择和鉴定以及关键生物活性化合物的鉴定,并比较了非靶向代谢组学等最先进的方法与更传统的特征描述靶向方法。选择的主题与研究人员最相关,并对其进行了批判性评论,指出哪些方法最实用和有用,以及应避免哪些常见陷阱。