Suppr超能文献

用于研究的植物天然产物的选择和鉴定:NaPDI 中心推荐的方法。

Selection and characterization of botanical natural products for research studies: a NaPDI center recommended approach.

机构信息

Department of Chemistry & Biochemistry, University of North Carolina at Greensboro, Greensboro, North Carolina, USA.

出版信息

Nat Prod Rep. 2019 Aug 14;36(8):1196-1221. doi: 10.1039/c8np00065d.

Abstract

Covering: up to the end of 2018 Dietary supplements, which include botanical (plant-based) natural products, constitute a multi-billion-dollar industry in the US. Regulation and quality control for this industry is an ongoing challenge. While there is general agreement that rigorous scientific studies are needed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of botanical natural products used by consumers, researchers conducting such studies face a unique set of challenges. Botanical natural products are inherently complex mixtures, with composition that differs depending on myriad factors including variability in genetics, cultivation conditions, and processing methods. Unfortunately, many studies of botanical natural products are carried out with poorly characterized study material, such that the results are irreproducible and difficult to interpret. This review provides recommended approaches for addressing the critical questions that researchers must address prior to in vitro or in vivo (including clinical) evaluation of botanical natural products. We describe selection and authentication of botanical material and identification of key biologically active compounds, and compare state-of-the-art methodologies such as untargeted metabolomics with more traditional targeted methods of characterization. The topics are chosen to be of maximal relevance to researchers, and are reviewed critically with commentary as to which approaches are most practical and useful and what common pitfalls should be avoided.

摘要

涵盖范围

截至 2018 年底,膳食补充剂包括植物(基于植物)天然产品,在美国构成了数十亿美元的产业。该行业的监管和质量控制是一个持续存在的挑战。虽然人们普遍认为需要严格的科学研究来评估消费者使用的植物天然产品的安全性和有效性,但进行此类研究的研究人员面临着一组独特的挑战。植物天然产品本质上是复杂的混合物,其成分因包括遗传、种植条件和加工方法在内的无数因素而异。不幸的是,许多植物天然产品的研究都是用特征描述不佳的研究材料进行的,因此结果不可重现,难以解释。本综述提供了建议的方法,用于解决研究人员在体外或体内(包括临床)评估植物天然产品之前必须解决的关键问题。我们描述了植物材料的选择和鉴定以及关键生物活性化合物的鉴定,并比较了非靶向代谢组学等最先进的方法与更传统的特征描述靶向方法。选择的主题与研究人员最相关,并对其进行了批判性评论,指出哪些方法最实用和有用,以及应避免哪些常见陷阱。

相似文献

2
Chemometric-Guided Approaches for Profiling and Authenticating Botanical Materials.
Front Nutr. 2021 Nov 26;8:780228. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2021.780228. eCollection 2021.
3
Naturally complex: Perspectives and challenges associated with Botanical Dietary Supplement Safety assessment.
Food Chem Toxicol. 2018 Aug;118:963-971. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2018.04.007. Epub 2018 Apr 4.
4
Recommended Approaches for Pharmacokinetic Natural Product-Drug Interaction Research: a NaPDI Center Commentary.
Drug Metab Dispos. 2018 Jul;46(7):1041-1045. doi: 10.1124/dmd.117.079962. Epub 2018 May 7.
6
The Botanical Safety Consortium: A public-private partnership to enhance the botanical safety toolkit.
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2022 Feb;128:105090. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2021.105090. Epub 2021 Dec 1.
9
A comprehensive approach to identifying and authenticating botanical products.
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2010 Feb;87(2):175-86. doi: 10.1038/clpt.2009.287. Epub 2009 Dec 23.
10
Implementing a "quality by design" approach to assure the safety and integrity of botanical dietary supplements.
J Nat Prod. 2012 Sep 28;75(9):1665-73. doi: 10.1021/np300434j. Epub 2012 Aug 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Angiogenesis as a Therapeutic Target of (Poly)phenols: Tackling Cancer and Vascular-Related Complications.
Mol Nutr Food Res. 2025 Aug;69(15):e70110. doi: 10.1002/mnfr.70110. Epub 2025 May 15.
2
Development of reference materials for dietary supplements-analytical challenges, use, limitations, and future needs.
Anal Bioanal Chem. 2025 May;417(12):2439-2471. doi: 10.1007/s00216-025-05787-2. Epub 2025 Mar 15.
3
Antimicrobial Effectiveness of L. Leaf Extracts Prepared in Natural Deep Eutectic Solvents (NaDESs).
Antibiotics (Basel). 2024 Nov 22;13(12):1118. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics13121118.
5
6
Rifampin- and Silymarin-Mediated Pharmacokinetic Interactions of Exogenous and Endogenous Substrates in a Transgenic OATP1B Mouse Model.
Mol Pharm. 2024 May 6;21(5):2284-2297. doi: 10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.3c01088. Epub 2024 Mar 26.
7
Advancing botanical safety: A strategy for selecting, sourcing, and characterizing botanicals for developing toxicological tools.
Food Chem Toxicol. 2024 Apr;186:114537. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2024.114537. Epub 2024 Feb 27.
8
Alternative Assisted Extraction Methods of Phenolic Compounds Using NaDESs.
Antioxidants (Basel). 2023 Dec 29;13(1):62. doi: 10.3390/antiox13010062.
9
Herbgenomics meets Papaveraceae: a promising -omics perspective on medicinal plant research.
Brief Funct Genomics. 2024 Sep 27;23(5):579-594. doi: 10.1093/bfgp/elad050.
10
Improving the rigor and utility of botanical toxicity studies: Recommended resources.
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2023 Oct;144:105471. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2023.105471. Epub 2023 Aug 19.

本文引用的文献

1
Detection of adulteration in Hydrastis canadensis (goldenseal) dietary supplements via untargeted mass spectrometry-based metabolomics.
Food Chem Toxicol. 2018 Oct;120:439-447. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2018.07.033. Epub 2018 Jul 19.
2
Getting to the Root of the Matter: Challenges and Recommendations for Assessing the Safety of Botanical Dietary Supplements.
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2018 Sep;104(3):429-431. doi: 10.1002/cpt.1088. Epub 2018 May 10.
3
Recommended Approaches for Pharmacokinetic Natural Product-Drug Interaction Research: a NaPDI Center Commentary.
Drug Metab Dispos. 2018 Jul;46(7):1041-1045. doi: 10.1124/dmd.117.079962. Epub 2018 May 7.
4
Integration of Biochemometrics and Molecular Networking to Identify Antimicrobials in Angelica keiskei.
Planta Med. 2018 Jul;84(9-10):721-728. doi: 10.1055/a-0590-5223. Epub 2018 Mar 23.
6
Methods for evaluating antimicrobial activity: A review.
J Pharm Anal. 2016 Apr;6(2):71-79. doi: 10.1016/j.jpha.2015.11.005. Epub 2015 Dec 2.
7
Dietary Supplements: Regulatory Challenges and Research Resources.
Nutrients. 2018 Jan 4;10(1):41. doi: 10.3390/nu10010041.
8
Integrated analytical assets aid botanical authenticity and adulteration management.
Fitoterapia. 2018 Sep;129:401-414. doi: 10.1016/j.fitote.2017.11.017. Epub 2017 Nov 22.
9
Biochemometrics to Identify Synergists and Additives from Botanical Medicines: A Case Study with Hydrastis canadensis (Goldenseal).
J Nat Prod. 2018 Mar 23;81(3):484-493. doi: 10.1021/acs.jnatprod.7b00654. Epub 2017 Nov 1.
10
Conventional and accelerated-solvent extractions of green tea (camellia sinensis) for metabolomics-based chemometrics.
J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2017 Oct 25;145:604-610. doi: 10.1016/j.jpba.2017.07.027. Epub 2017 Jul 29.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验