Centre for Public Health,Queen's University Belfast,Institute of Clinical Sciences, Block B,Royal Victoria Hospital,Belfast BT12 6BA,UK.
Public Health Nutr. 2019 Apr;22(5):942-955. doi: 10.1017/S1368980018003750. Epub 2019 Feb 1.
To summarise findings of systematic reviews that distinctively report dietary intervention components and their effects on diet-, health- and economic-related outcomes in the workplace setting.
MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, Cochrane Library and Google Scholar were searched in December 2014 and the search was updated in August 2017.
The search identified 1137 titles, of which nineteen systematic reviews from the initial search and two systematic reviews from the updated search met the inclusion criteria (twenty-one systematic reviews, published in twenty-two papers). Most systematic reviews were of moderate quality and focused on dietary behaviour change outcomes and some health-related biomarkers. Evidence was strongest for interventions to increase fruit and vegetable intake, reduce fat intake, aid weight loss and reduce cholesterol. Few reported workplace-related and evaluation outcomes.
These findings suggest that workplace dietary interventions can positively influence diet and health outcomes. Suggestions for effective interventions components have been made.
总结系统评价的研究结果，这些系统评价明确报告了工作场所环境中饮食干预成分及其对饮食、健康和经济相关结果的影响。
2014 年 12 月检索了 MEDLINE、Embase、CINAHL、Web of Science、Cochrane 图书馆和 Google Scholar，并于 2017 年 8 月进行了更新。
检索到 1137 个标题，其中 19 项来自初始搜索的系统评价和 2 项来自更新搜索的系统评价符合纳入标准（21 项系统评价，发表在 22 篇论文中）。大多数系统评价的质量为中等，重点关注饮食行为改变结果和一些与健康相关的生物标志物。证据最强的是干预措施增加水果和蔬菜摄入量、减少脂肪摄入、帮助减肥和降低胆固醇。很少有研究报告与工作场所相关和评估结果。
这些发现表明，工作场所饮食干预可以积极影响饮食和健康结果。已经提出了一些有效的干预措施建议。
