Suppr超能文献

商用牙本质粘结系统对粪肠球菌的抗菌活性——流式细胞术研究

Antibacterial Activity of Commercial Dentine Bonding Systems against E. faecalis-Flow Cytometry Study.

作者信息

Lukomska-Szymanska Monika, Konieczka Magdalena, Zarzycka Beata, Lapinska Barbara, Grzegorczyk Janina, Sokolowski Jerzy

机构信息

Department of General Dentistry, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz 92-213, Poland.

Department of Microbiology and Laboratory Medical Immunology, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz 92-213, Poland.

出版信息

Materials (Basel). 2017 Apr 29;10(5):481. doi: 10.3390/ma10050481.

Abstract

Literature presents inconsistent results on the antibacterial activity of dentine bonding systems (DBS). Antibacterial activity of adhesive systems depends on several factors, including composition and acidity. Flow cytometry is a novel detection method to measure multiple characteristics of a single cell: total cell number, structural (size, shape), and functional parameters (viability, cell cycle). The LIVE/DEAD® BacLightTM bacterial viability assay was used to evaluate an antibacterial activity of DBS by assessing physical membrane disruption of bacteria mediated by DBS. Ten commercial DBSs: four total-etching (TE), four self-etching (SE) and two selective enamel etching (SEE) were tested. Both total-etching DBS ExciTE F and OptiBond Solo Plus showed comparatively low antibacterial activity against E. faecalis. The lowest activity of all tested TE systems showed Te-Econom Bond. Among SE DBS, G-ænial Bond (92.24% dead cells) followed by Clearfil S3 Bond Plus (88.02%) and Panavia F 2.0 ED Primer II (86.67%) showed the highest antibacterial activity against E. faecalis, which was comparable to isopropranol (positive control). In the present study, self-etching DBS exhibited higher antimicrobial activity than tested total-etching adhesives against E. faecalis.

摘要

文献中关于牙本质粘结系统(DBS)的抗菌活性呈现出不一致的结果。粘结系统的抗菌活性取决于多个因素,包括成分和酸度。流式细胞术是一种用于测量单个细胞多种特性的新型检测方法:细胞总数、结构(大小、形状)和功能参数(活力、细胞周期)。采用LIVE/DEAD® BacLightTM细菌活力检测法,通过评估DBS介导的细菌细胞膜物理破坏情况来评价DBS的抗菌活性。测试了十种市售DBS:四种全酸蚀(TE)、四种自酸蚀(SE)和两种选择性釉质酸蚀(SEE)。全酸蚀DBS ExciTE F和OptiBond Solo Plus对粪肠球菌均表现出相对较低的抗菌活性。所有测试的TE系统中,Te-Econom Bond的活性最低。在SE DBS中,G-ænial Bond(92.24%死细胞),其次是Clearfil S3 Bond Plus(88.02%)和Panavia F 2.0 ED Primer II(86.67%)对粪肠球菌表现出最高的抗菌活性,这与异丙醇(阳性对照)相当。在本研究中,自酸蚀DBS对粪肠球菌的抗菌活性高于测试的全酸蚀粘结剂。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d814/5458997/b532f8d43a57/materials-10-00481-g001.jpg

相似文献

2
Flow Cytometry Analysis of Antibacterial Effects of Universal Dentin Bonding Agents on .
Molecules. 2019 Feb 1;24(3):532. doi: 10.3390/molecules24030532.
4
[Antibacterial effect of self-etching adhesive systems on Streptococcus mutans].
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2016 Feb 18;48(1):57-62.
5
Antibacterial activity of various self-etching adhesive systems against oral streptococci.
Oper Dent. 2010 Jul-Aug;35(4):448-53. doi: 10.2341/09-297-L.
6
Influence of human dentine on the antibacterial activity of self-etching adhesive systems against cariogenic bacteria.
J Dent. 2008 Apr;36(4):241-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2007.12.007. Epub 2008 Feb 13.
7
Bond strengths of eight contemporary adhesives to enamel and to dentine: an in vitro study on bovine primary teeth.
Int J Paediatr Dent. 2005 Jul;15(4):264-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-263X.2005.00650.x.
8
Bonding characteristics of self-etching adhesives to intact versus prepared enamel.
J Esthet Restor Dent. 2003;15(1):32-41; discussion 42. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8240.2003.tb00280.x.
9
Microtensile dentin and enamel bond strengths of recent self-etching resins.
Oper Dent. 2008 Jan-Feb;33(1):89-95. doi: 10.2341/07-43.
10
Bond strengths of one- and two-step self-etch adhesive systems.
J Prosthet Dent. 2007 Apr;97(4):216-22. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2007.02.013.

引用本文的文献

1
Antibacterial and anatomical defenses in an oil contaminated, vulnerable seaduck.
Ecol Evol. 2021 Aug 19;11(18):12520-12528. doi: 10.1002/ece3.7996. eCollection 2021 Sep.
2
The Toxicity of Universal Dental Adhesives: An In Vitro Study.
Polymers (Basel). 2021 Aug 10;13(16):2653. doi: 10.3390/polym13162653.
6
The Cytotoxicity and Genotoxicity of Three Dental Universal Adhesives-An In Vitro Study.
Int J Mol Sci. 2020 May 31;21(11):3950. doi: 10.3390/ijms21113950.
7
Flow Cytometry Analysis of Antibacterial Effects of Universal Dentin Bonding Agents on .
Molecules. 2019 Feb 1;24(3):532. doi: 10.3390/molecules24030532.

本文引用的文献

1
Methods for evaluating antimicrobial activity: A review.
J Pharm Anal. 2016 Apr;6(2):71-79. doi: 10.1016/j.jpha.2015.11.005. Epub 2015 Dec 2.
2
The effect of curing conditions on the dentin bond strength of two dual-cure resin cements.
J Prosthodont Res. 2017 Oct;61(4):412-418. doi: 10.1016/j.jpor.2016.12.012. Epub 2017 Jan 23.
3
Antibacterial Properties of Calcium Fluoride-Based Composite Materials: Study.
Biomed Res Int. 2016;2016:1048320. doi: 10.1155/2016/1048320. Epub 2016 Dec 8.
4
Reevaluating multicolor flow cytometry to assess microbial viability.
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2016 Nov;100(21):9037-9051. doi: 10.1007/s00253-016-7837-5. Epub 2016 Sep 29.
5
Applications of imaging flow cytometry in the diagnostic assessment of acute leukaemia.
Methods. 2017 Jan 1;112:39-45. doi: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2016.06.023. Epub 2016 Jul 6.
6
Comparison of shear bond strength of universal adhesives on etched and nonetched enamel.
J Appl Biomater Funct Mater. 2016 Apr 6;14(1):e78-83. doi: 10.5301/jabfm.5000261.
7
Application of Flow Cytometry in the Evaluation of Primary Immunodeficiencies.
Indian J Pediatr. 2016 May;83(5):444-9. doi: 10.1007/s12098-015-2011-0. Epub 2016 Feb 11.
8
Flow cytometry: basic principles and applications.
Crit Rev Biotechnol. 2017 Mar;37(2):163-176. doi: 10.3109/07388551.2015.1128876. Epub 2016 Jan 14.
9
A systematic review about antibacterial monomers used in dental adhesive systems: Current status and further prospects.
Dent Mater. 2015 Nov;31(11):1345-62. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2015.08.155. Epub 2015 Sep 4.
10
Fluorescence-based tools for single-cell approaches in food microbiology.
Int J Food Microbiol. 2015 Nov 20;213:2-16. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2015.07.003. Epub 2015 Jul 8.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验