1 Department of Biomaterials and Biomimetics, College of Dentistry, New York University, New York, NY, USA.
2 Graduate Program in Dentistry, University of Passo Fundo, Passo Fundo, Brazil.
J Dent Res. 2019 Apr;98(4):437-442. doi: 10.1177/0022034518820918. Epub 2019 Feb 11.
Monolithic zirconia crowns have become very popular; their surface finish is considered a key factor for restoration longevity. While polishing has shown excellent results in vivo, the surface glass infiltration of zirconia may offer superior damage resistance and aesthetic advantages by using tooth-colored glasses. Thus, the purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of polishing and glass infiltration on the wear behavior of monolithic zirconia crowns. The wear behavior of intact natural molar teeth was investigated as a reference. Zirconia crowns were divided into 3 groups: PolZ-sintered then polished; PolGZ-polished in the presintered state and then glass infiltrated and sintered; NoPolGZ-as machined, glass infiltrated and sintered. Crowns were adhesively bonded to a dentin-like abutment. Zirconia crowns and molar teeth ( n = 15) were subjected to contact-slide-liftoff cyclic loading (200 N, 1.25 million cycles) with a steatite sphere ( r = 3 mm) as an antagonist in water. Surface and subsurface damages were investigated with optical and scanning electron microscopies. Wear depth and volume loss were determined with micro-computed tomography. PolGZ and NoPolGZ crowns exhibited shallow wear scars, where material loss remained within the glass/zirconia layer with no visible cracks. Meanwhile, PolZ crowns presented no visible wear damage. Volume loss (mm) in the steatite antagonist was as follows (mean ± SD): PolZ = 0.022 ± 0.007, PolGZ = 0.011 ± 0.004, and NoPolGZ = 0.014 ± 0.006. Molar teeth yielded no measurable wear on the antagonist, while the wear scar on the teeth was greater than that on zirconia crowns, ranging from 0.07 to 0.35 mm. The combination of polishing and glass infiltration on the occlusal surface of monolithic zirconia crowns yielded reduced wear on both crown and antagonist.
整体氧化锆冠已非常流行;其表面光洁度被认为是修复体寿命的关键因素。虽然抛光在体内已显示出优异的效果,但通过使用牙色玻璃对氧化锆进行表面玻璃渗透处理可能具有更好的抗损伤性和美学优势。因此,本研究旨在评估抛光和玻璃渗透对整体氧化锆冠磨损行为的影响。以完整的天然磨牙的磨损行为作为参考。氧化锆冠分为 3 组:PolZ-烧结后抛光;PolGZ-预烧结后抛光,然后玻璃渗透和烧结;NoPolGZ-加工后,玻璃渗透和烧结。将牙冠粘接到类似牙本质的基台上。用滑石球(r = 3 mm)作为对颌,在水中对氧化锆牙冠和磨牙(n = 15)进行接触-滑动-抬起循环加载(200 N,125 万次循环)。用光学显微镜和扫描电子显微镜观察表面和亚表面损伤。用微计算机断层扫描法测定磨损深度和体积损失。PolGZ 和 NoPolGZ 牙冠显示出浅的磨损痕迹,材料损失仍在玻璃/氧化锆层内,没有可见的裂纹。同时,PolZ 牙冠没有明显的磨损损伤。滑石对颌体的体积损失(mm)如下(平均值 ± 标准差):PolZ = 0.022 ± 0.007,PolGZ = 0.011 ± 0.004,NoPolGZ = 0.014 ± 0.006。磨牙在对颌体上没有可测量的磨损,而牙齿上的磨损痕迹大于氧化锆牙冠,范围从 0.07 到 0.35 mm。整体氧化锆牙冠的牙合面抛光和玻璃渗透处理可减少牙冠和对颌体的磨损。