Resources for the Future, Washington, DC 20036;
Institute of Social and Economic Research, University of Alaska Anchorage, Anchorage, AK 99508.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Mar 5;116(10):4188-4193. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1816545116. Epub 2019 Feb 13.
The emergence of ecosystem-based fisheries management (EBFM) has broadened the policy scope of fisheries management by accounting for the biological and ecological connectivity of fisheries. Less attention, however, has been given to the economic connectivity of fisheries. If fishers consider multiple fisheries when deciding where, when, and how much to fish, then management changes in one fishery can generate spillover impacts in other fisheries. Catch-share programs are a popular fisheries management framework that may be particularly prone to generating spillovers given that they typically change fishers' incentives and their subsequent actions. We use data from Alaska fisheries to examine spillovers from each of the main catch-share programs in Alaska. We evaluate changes in participation-a traditional indicator in fisheries economics-in both the catch-share and non-catch-share fisheries. Using network analysis, we also investigate whether catch-share programs change the economic connectivity of fisheries, which can have implications for the socioeconomic resilience and robustness of the ecosystem, and empirically identify the set of fisheries impacted by each Alaska catch-share program. We find that cross-fishery participation spillovers and changes in economic connectivity coincide with some, but not all, catch-share programs. Our findings suggest that economic connectivity and the potential for cross-fishery spillovers deserve serious consideration, especially when designing and evaluating EBFM policies.
基于生态系统的渔业管理(EBFM)的出现扩大了渔业管理的政策范围,考虑到了渔业的生物和生态连通性。然而,渔业的经济连通性却没有得到太多关注。如果渔民在决定在哪里、何时以及捕捞多少鱼时考虑到多种渔业,那么一个渔业的管理变化可能会对其他渔业产生溢出影响。捕捞份额计划是一种流行的渔业管理框架,由于它们通常会改变渔民的激励措施及其后续行动,因此可能特别容易产生溢出效应。我们使用来自阿拉斯加渔业的数据来检验阿拉斯加每种主要捕捞份额计划的溢出效应。我们评估了捕捞份额和非捕捞份额渔业中参与度的变化——这是渔业经济学中的一个传统指标。我们还使用网络分析来研究捕捞份额计划是否改变了渔业的经济连通性,这可能对生态系统的社会经济弹性和稳健性产生影响,并从经验上确定每个阿拉斯加捕捞份额计划所影响的渔业。我们发现,跨渔业参与溢出效应和经济连通性的变化与某些(但不是全部)捕捞份额计划相符。我们的研究结果表明,经济连通性和跨渔业溢出效应的潜力值得认真考虑,尤其是在设计和评估 EBFM 政策时。