Xu L H, Xie G L, Li B, Zhu B, Xu F S, Qian J
State Key Laboratory of Rice Biology, Institute of Biotechnology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310029, China.
Hangzhou Plant Protection Station, Hangzhou, China. This study was supported by the National Science Foundation of China (30671397) and 863 project (2006AA10A211).
Plant Dis. 2008 May;92(5):832. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-92-5-0832C.
In the spring of 2006, a new bacterial disease was noted in pear orchards near Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China. The disease caused severe blossom blast on pears (Pyrus pyrifolia; cv. Cuiguan). Early symptoms of the disease included blackening of the calyx end of developing fruit, blackening of blossom clusters while leaves of affected blossom clusters appeared normal, or death of clusters consisting of both blossoms and leaves. Later, tips of twigs turned dark brown and died. No bacterial ooze was observed. Twelve bacterial isolates were recovered from ten samples of buds and blossoms. Six isolates were selected for identification. They were similar to those of the reference strains of Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae LMG5570 and LMG 2230 from Belgium in phenotypic tests on the basis of the Biolog Microbial Identification System (version 4.2; Biolog Inc., Hayward, CA), pathogenicity tests, gas chromatographic analysis of fatty acid methyl esters (FAMEs) using the Microbial Identification System (MIDI Inc., Newark, DE) with aerobic bacterial library (TABA50), and electron microscopy (TEM, KYKY-1000B, Japan). All isolates tested were gram-negative, aerobic rods measuring 1.5 to 2.4 × 0.5 to 0.6 μm with 2 to 4 polar flagella. Fluorescent green diffusible pigment was produced on King's Medium B. Colonies were gray-white and slightly raised with smooth margins on nutrient agar. They produced levan on sucrose nutrient agar. A hypersensitive reaction was observed on tobacco cv. Benshi 24 h after inoculation. All isolates were identified as P. syringae pv. syringae with Biolog similarity index of 0.57 to 0.86 and FAME similarity index of 0.58 to 0.81. Identification as P. syringae pv. syringae was confirmed using 16S rDNA universal primers (2,3): 5'-AGA GTT TGA TCA TGG CTC AG-3' forward primer, 5'-ACG GTT ACC TTG TTA CGA CTT-3' reverse primer. The PCR fragments of the three isolates were sequenced and compared with sequences in GenBank. They had 99% similiarity with P. syringae pv. syringae 16S rRNA gene strain NCPPB 3869. Koch's postulates were conducted on buds of the original pear cultivar growing in pots and detached pear blossoms in flasks by spray inoculation with cell suspensions containing 10 CFU/ml of the six isolates at 18 to 22°C with two replications. The bacteria induced symptoms on buds and blossoms similar to those observed in the field. The bacterium was reisolated from symptomatic pear buds and internal ovary tissues. P. syringae pv. syringae was first reported in England as the cause of pear blossom blast in 1914 (1). After searching all the Chinese agricultural databases and major journals (National Knowledge Infrastructure database, Vip Chinese periodical database, Chinese wanfang database, China InfoBank, Scientia Agricultura Sinica, Acta Phytopathologica Sinica, Acta Phytophylacica Sinica, and Journal of Fruit Science), to our knowledge, this is the first report of pear blossom blast caused by P. syringae pv. syringae in China. The disease cycle on pear trees and the control strategies in the regions are being further studied. References: (1) B. P. Barker et al. Ann. Appl. Biol. 1:85, 1914. (2) U. Edward et al. Nucleic Acids Res. 17:7843,1989. (3) B. Li et al. J. Phytopathol. 34:141, 2006.
2006年春,在中国浙江省杭州市附近的梨园发现了一种新的细菌性病害。该病害导致梨树(Pyrus pyrifolia;翠冠品种)严重的花腐病。病害的早期症状包括发育中果实萼端变黑、花簇变黑而受影响花簇的叶片看似正常,或花和叶组成的花簇死亡。后来,嫩梢尖端变成深褐色并枯死。未观察到菌脓。从10个芽和花的样本中分离出12株细菌。选择6株分离物进行鉴定。基于Biolog微生物鉴定系统(版本4.2;Biolog公司,美国加利福尼亚州海沃德市)的表型测试、致病性测试、使用带有需氧细菌文库(TABA50)的微生物鉴定系统(MIDI公司,美国特拉华州纽瓦克市)对脂肪酸甲酯(FAMEs)进行气相色谱分析以及电子显微镜观察(透射电子显微镜,KYKY - 1000B,日本),这些分离物在表型上与来自比利时的丁香假单胞菌丁香致病变种(Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae)参考菌株LMG5570和LMG 2230相似。所有测试的分离物均为革兰氏阴性、需氧杆菌,大小为1.5至2.4×0.5至0.6μm,具2至4根极生鞭毛。在King氏B培养基上产生绿色荧光可扩散色素。在营养琼脂上菌落为灰白色,稍凸起,边缘光滑。它们在蔗糖营养琼脂上产生果聚糖。接种后24小时在烟草品种本氏烟上观察到过敏反应。所有分离物经Biolog相似性指数为0.57至0.86以及FAME相似性指数为0.58至0.81鉴定为丁香假单胞菌丁香致病变种。使用16S rDNA通用引物(2,3):5'-AGA GTT TGA TCA TGG CTC AG-3'正向引物,5'-ACG GTT ACC TTG TTA CGA CTT-3'反向引物,确认鉴定为丁香假单胞菌丁香致病变种。对3株分离物的PCR片段进行测序并与GenBank中的序列比较。它们与丁香假单胞菌丁香致病变种16S rRNA基因菌株NCPPB 3869具有99%的相似性。通过在18至22°C下用含有10 CFU/ml这6株分离物的细胞悬液喷雾接种盆栽原梨品种的芽和烧瓶中离体梨花,进行了柯赫氏法则验证,重复两次。细菌在芽和花上诱导出与田间观察到的症状相似的症状。从有症状的梨芽和内部子房组织中重新分离出该细菌。丁香假单胞菌丁香致病变种于1914年在英国首次报道为梨树花腐病的病因(1)。在检索了所有中国农业数据库和主要期刊(中国知网数据库、维普中文期刊数据库、万方数据库、中经网、《中国农业科学》《植物病理学报》《植物保护学报》和《果树学报》)后,据我们所知,这是中国首次报道由丁香假单胞菌丁香致病变种引起的梨树花腐病。正在进一步研究梨树的病害循环以及该地区的防治策略。参考文献:(1)B. P. Barker等人,《应用生物学年报》1:85,1914年。(2)U. Edward等人,《核酸研究》17:7843,1989年。(3)B. Li等人,《植物病理学杂志》34:141,2006年。