Center for Obesity Research and Education, College of Public Health, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Department of Nutritional Sciences, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor.
JAMA Pediatr. 2019 Apr 1;173(4):326-333. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2018.5531.
Serving breakfast in the classroom is promoted to increase participation in the federal School Breakfast Program. However, little is known about the effect of breakfast in the classroom on children's weight status.
To evaluate the effect of a breakfast in the classroom initiative, which combined breakfast in the classroom with breakfast-specific nutrition education, on overweight and obesity among urban children in low-income communities.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A cluster-randomized clinical trial among 1362 fourth- through sixth-grade students from low-income urban communities across 2.5 years. Sixteen kindergarten through eighth grade Philadelphia public schools with universal breakfast participated. Participants were recruited in September 2013, and the intervention began in January 2014. Data analysis took place from April 1, 2018, to August 30, 2018.
Intervention schools received a program that included breakfast in the classroom and breakfast-specific nutrition education. Control schools continued breakfast before school in the cafeteria and standard nutrition education.
The primary outcome was the combined incidence of overweight and obesity. Secondary outcomes included the combined prevalence of overweight and obesity, incidence and prevalence of obesity, changes in body mass index (BMI) z score, and School Breakfast Program participation.
Among the 1362 students, mean (SD) age was 10.8 (0.96) years and 700 (51.4%) were female; 907 (66.6%) were black, 233 (17.1%) were Hispanic, 100 (7.3%) were white, 83 (6.1%) were Asian, and 39 were of multiple or other race/ethnicity. After 2.5 years, students in intervention schools had participated in the School Breakfast Program 53.8% of days, compared with 24.9% of days among students in control schools (β = 0.33; 95% CI, 0.22-0.42). There was no difference between intervention and control schools in the combined incidence of overweight and obesity after 2.5 years (11.7% vs 9.3%; odds ratio [OR] 1.31; 95% CI, 0.85-2.02; P = .22). However, the incidence (11.6% vs 4.4%; OR, 2.43; 95% CI, 1.47-4.00) and prevalence (28.0% vs 21.2%; OR, 1.46; 95% CI, 1.11-1.92) of obesity were higher in intervention schools than in control schools after 2.5 years.
A breakfast in the classroom initiative increased participation in the School Breakfast Program and did not affect the combined incidence of overweight and obesity. However, the initiative had an unintended consequence of increasing incident and prevalent obesity. Further research is needed to identify approaches to increase participation in the School Breakfast Program that do not increase obesity among students.
ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01924130.
在课堂上提供早餐被推广以增加参与联邦学校早餐计划的人数。然而,关于在课堂上提供早餐对儿童体重状况的影响,我们知之甚少。
评估在课堂上提供早餐的倡议对低收入社区城市儿童超重和肥胖的影响,该倡议将在课堂上提供早餐与特定于早餐的营养教育相结合。
设计、地点和参与者:一项针对 2.5 年期间来自低收城市社区的 1362 名四至六年级学生的集群随机临床试验。16 所费城公立学校从幼儿园到八年级都参加了普遍提供早餐的活动。参与者于 2013 年 9 月招募,并于 2014 年 1 月开始干预。数据分析于 2018 年 4 月 1 日至 2018 年 8 月 30 日进行。
干预学校接受了一项包括在课堂上提供早餐和特定于早餐的营养教育的计划。对照学校继续在自助餐厅提供早餐,并提供标准的营养教育。
主要结果是超重和肥胖的综合发病率。次要结果包括超重和肥胖的综合患病率、肥胖的发病率和患病率、体重指数 (BMI) z 分数的变化以及学校早餐计划的参与情况。
在 1362 名学生中,平均(SD)年龄为 10.8(0.96)岁,700 名(51.4%)为女性;907 名(66.6%)为黑人,233 名(17.1%)为西班牙裔,100 名(7.3%)为白人,83 名(6.1%)为亚洲人,39 名是多种族裔或其他种族/民族。2.5 年后,干预学校的学生参加学校早餐计划的天数为 53.8%,而对照学校的学生为 24.9%(β=0.33;95%置信区间,0.22-0.42)。2.5 年后,干预学校和对照学校的超重和肥胖综合发病率无差异(11.7%对 9.3%;比值比[OR],1.31;95%置信区间,0.85-2.02;P=0.22)。然而,干预学校的肥胖发病率(11.6%对 4.4%;OR,2.43;95%置信区间,1.47-4.00)和患病率(28.0%对 21.2%;OR,1.46;95%置信区间,1.11-1.92)均高于对照学校。
在课堂上提供早餐的倡议增加了学校早餐计划的参与度,但并未影响超重和肥胖的综合发病率。然而,该倡议产生了一个意想不到的后果,即增加了肥胖的发生率和流行率。需要进一步研究,以确定增加学校早餐计划参与度的方法,而不会增加学生的肥胖率。
ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符:NCT01924130。