NuESA - Health Environment Study Group, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Beira Interior, Covilhã, Portugal.
Centro de Medicina de Reabilitação da Região Centro Rovisco Pais, Tocha, Portugal.
J Asthma. 2020 May;57(5):556-566. doi: 10.1080/02770903.2019.1582063. Epub 2019 Feb 27.
Incorrect inhaler usage is frequent, particularly in elderly asthmatic patients. This study aimed at comparing inhaler technique errors and their determinants, as well inhaler technique self-perception versus real performance, between elderly and non-elderly asthmatics. Cross-sectional assessment of 92 elderly and 100 non-elderly asthmatics followed at specialty clinics. A standardized questionnaire was applied and inhaler technique demonstration was requested. Errors were assessed using checklists based on manufacturers' instructions and inhaler technique was graded as correct, acceptable or incorrect. Chi-Square Test and Fischer's Exact Test were used for comparative analysis of nominal variables. A value equal to or less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Inhaler technique was correct in a minority of elderly and young patients, without significant differences between study groups. Only 11.1% of the elderly who classified their inhaler as easy and 12.7% who stated their technique was correct had no errors. Previous regular inhaler training was associated with better actual performance in young but not in elderly patients. Our study showed that in spite of regular follow up at specialized outpatient clinics, inhaler devices are associated with a high frequency of errors in elderly and non-elderly asthmatics. In addition, most patients tend to overestimate their technique as correct. Finally, previous, frequent training was associated with a significantly higher percentage of patients showing correct or acceptable technique but only in non-elderly asthmatics, which suggests that elderly asthmatics may need specifically tailored inhaler education programs.
不正确的吸入器使用方法很常见,尤其是在老年哮喘患者中。本研究旨在比较老年和非老年哮喘患者之间的吸入器技术错误及其决定因素,以及吸入器技术自我感知与实际性能之间的差异。对在专科诊所就诊的 92 名老年和 100 名非老年哮喘患者进行横断面评估。应用标准化问卷并要求演示吸入器技术。使用基于制造商说明书的检查表评估错误,并将吸入器技术评为正确、可接受或不正确。使用卡方检验和 Fisher 精确检验对名义变量进行比较分析。 值等于或小于 0.05 被认为具有统计学意义。少数老年和年轻患者的吸入器技术正确,两组之间无显著差异。仅 11.1%的将其吸入器归类为简单的老年患者和 12.7%的认为其技术正确的老年患者没有错误。以前定期的吸入器培训与年轻患者的实际表现更好相关,但与老年患者无关。我们的研究表明,尽管在专门的门诊诊所进行定期随访,但吸入器装置与老年和非老年哮喘患者中吸入器技术错误的高频率相关。此外,大多数患者倾向于高估自己的技术是正确的。最后,以前的频繁培训与显示正确或可接受技术的患者比例显著增加相关,但仅在非老年哮喘患者中,这表明老年哮喘患者可能需要专门制定吸入器教育计划。