• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

7 种风险因素对老年日本人发生痴呆的联合影响:大崎队列 2006 年研究。

Joint impact of seven risk factors on incident dementia in elderly Japanese: the Ohsaki Cohort 2006 Study.

机构信息

Division of Epidemiology, Department of Health Informatics and Public Health, Tohoku University School of Public Health, Graduate School of Medicine, 2-1, Seiryo-machi, Aoba-ku, Sendai, Miyagi, 980-8575, Japan.

出版信息

J Neurol. 2019 May;266(5):1222-1229. doi: 10.1007/s00415-019-09252-w. Epub 2019 Mar 2.

DOI:10.1007/s00415-019-09252-w
PMID:30826894
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This cohort study estimated the population attributable fraction (PAF) of seven combined major risk factors for incident dementia.

METHODS

We conducted a cohort study of 8563 community-dwelling individuals aged ≥ 65 years. In a baseline survey (2006), we collected data on major seven risk factors: diabetes mellitus, hypertension, obesity, physical inactivity, severe psychological distress, smoking, and low educational attainment. The total number of risk factors was applied as an exposure variable. Subjects were categorized into four groups according to the total number of risk factors they possessed (0, 1, 2, ≥ 3 risk factors). Data on incident dementia were retrieved from the public Long-term Care Insurance database. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) were estimated using the Cox proportional regression model. We also calculated the PAF using HRs and the prevalences in our cohort data.

RESULTS

The number of cases of incident dementia was 577 (6.7%). A dose-response relationship between the total number of risk factors and incident dementia was observed; in comparison with no risk factors (reference), the age- and sex-adjusted HRs (95% CIs) were 1.25 (0.92-1.70) for one risk factor, 1.59 (1.18-2.15) for two, and 2.21 (1.62-3.01) for three or more (P trend < 0.001). If subjects had adhered to none of the risk factors, the PAF would have been 32.2%. If subjects had improved toward one better category, the PAF would have been 23.0%.

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that reducing the combined number of risk factors would contribute significantly to reducing the incidence of dementia.

摘要

背景

本队列研究估计了七种联合主要痴呆风险因素对发病的人群归因分数(PAF)。

方法

我们对 8563 名年龄≥65 岁的社区居民进行了队列研究。在基线调查(2006 年)中,我们收集了关于七种主要风险因素的数据:糖尿病、高血压、肥胖、身体活动不足、严重心理困扰、吸烟和低教育程度。总风险因素数量被用作暴露变量。根据所拥有的总风险因素数量,将受试者分为四组(0、1、2、≥3 个风险因素)。从公共长期护理保险数据库中检索到痴呆发病数据。使用 Cox 比例回归模型估计风险比(HR)和 95%置信区间(95%CI)。我们还使用 HR 和队列数据中的患病率计算了 PAF。

结果

发病痴呆的病例数为 577 例(6.7%)。总风险因素数量与发病痴呆之间存在剂量-反应关系;与无风险因素(参照)相比,年龄和性别调整后的 HR(95%CI)为 1.25(0.92-1.70)、1 个风险因素,1.59(1.18-2.15)、2 个风险因素,2.21(1.62-3.01)、3 个或更多风险因素(P趋势<0.001)。如果受试者没有遵守任何风险因素,PAF 将为 32.2%。如果受试者向一个更好的类别改善,PAF 将为 23.0%。

结论

我们的研究结果表明,减少联合风险因素的数量将显著有助于降低痴呆的发病率。

相似文献

1
Joint impact of seven risk factors on incident dementia in elderly Japanese: the Ohsaki Cohort 2006 Study.7 种风险因素对老年日本人发生痴呆的联合影响:大崎队列 2006 年研究。
J Neurol. 2019 May;266(5):1222-1229. doi: 10.1007/s00415-019-09252-w. Epub 2019 Mar 2.
2
Combined healthy lifestyle behaviours and incident disability in an elderly population: the Ohsaki Cohort 2006 Study.综合健康生活方式与老年人的发病残疾:大崎 cohort2006 研究。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2018 Aug;72(8):679-684. doi: 10.1136/jech-2018-210464. Epub 2018 Apr 7.
3
Joint impact of common risk factors on incident dementia: A cohort study of the Swedish Twin Registry.常见风险因素对新发痴呆的联合影响:来自瑞典双胞胎登记处的队列研究。
J Intern Med. 2020 Aug;288(2):234-247. doi: 10.1111/joim.13071. Epub 2020 May 3.
4
Association between Coffee Consumption and Incident Risk of Disabling Dementia in Elderly Japanese: The Ohsaki Cohort 2006 Study.咖啡摄入量与日本老年人失能性痴呆发病风险之间的关联:大崎队列2006研究
J Alzheimers Dis. 2016;50(2):491-500. doi: 10.3233/JAD-150693.
5
Impact of time spent walking on incident dementia in elderly Japanese.日本老年人步行时间与新发痴呆的关系。
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2019 Jan;34(1):204-209. doi: 10.1002/gps.5011. Epub 2018 Nov 8.
6
Smoking cessation and incident dementia in elderly Japanese: the Ohsaki Cohort 2006 Study.戒烟与老年日本人的痴呆症发病:大崎队列 2006 年研究。
Eur J Epidemiol. 2020 Sep;35(9):851-860. doi: 10.1007/s10654-020-00612-9. Epub 2020 Feb 15.
7
Changes in time spent walking and the risk of incident dementia in older Japanese people: the Ohsaki Cohort 2006 Study.时间花费在行走上的变化与老年日本人发生痴呆症的风险:大崎 cohort2006 研究。
Age Ageing. 2017 Sep 1;46(5):857-860. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afx078.
8
Changes in sleep duration and the risk of incident dementia in the elderly Japanese: the Ohsaki Cohort 2006 Study.睡眠时间的变化与老年日本人发生痴呆的风险:大崎 cohort 2006 研究。
Sleep. 2018 Oct 1;41(10). doi: 10.1093/sleep/zsy143.
9
Education level and incident functional disability in elderly Japanese: The Ohsaki Cohort 2006 study.教育水平与老年日本人的功能性失能事件:大崎队列 2006 年研究。
PLoS One. 2019 Mar 12;14(3):e0213386. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0213386. eCollection 2019.
10
Association Between Long-term Weight Change Since Midlife and Risk of Incident Disabling Dementia Among Elderly Japanese: The Ohsaki Cohort 2006 Study.中年后体重长期变化与老年日本人新发失能性痴呆风险的关系:大崎队列 2006 年研究。
J Epidemiol. 2022 May 5;32(5):237-243. doi: 10.2188/jea.JE20200260. Epub 2021 Apr 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Population attributable fractions of modifiable dementia risk factors for cognitive impairment-the ELSA-Brasil cohort study.认知障碍可改变痴呆风险因素的人群归因分数——巴西ELSA队列研究
Lancet Reg Health Am. 2025 Jul 12;49:101184. doi: 10.1016/j.lana.2025.101184. eCollection 2025 Sep.
2
Examining multimorbidity contributors to dementia over time.随着时间推移研究导致痴呆症的多种疾病因素。
Alzheimers Dement. 2025 Feb;21(2):e14589. doi: 10.1002/alz.14589.
3
Latent profiles of modifiable dementia risk factors in later midlife: relationships with incident dementia, cognition, and neuroimaging outcomes.

本文引用的文献

1
Association of Cardiovascular Health Level in Older Age With Cognitive Decline and Incident Dementia.老年心血管健康水平与认知能力下降和痴呆症发病的关系。
JAMA. 2018 Aug 21;320(7):657-664. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.11499.
2
What does the general public understand about prevention and treatment of dementia? A systematic review of population-based surveys.公众对痴呆症的预防和治疗了解多少?基于人群的调查系统评价。
PLoS One. 2018 Apr 19;13(4):e0196085. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0196085. eCollection 2018.
3
Identification of dementia using standard clinical assessments by primary care physicians in Japan.
中年后期可改变的痴呆风险因素的潜在概况:与新发痴呆、认知及神经影像学结果的关系
Mol Psychiatry. 2025 Feb;30(2):450-460. doi: 10.1038/s41380-024-02685-4. Epub 2024 Aug 5.
4
Temporal trends in population attributable fractions of modifiable risk factors for dementia: a time-series study of the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing (2004-2019).人口归因分数的时间趋势:可改变的痴呆风险因素在英国老龄化纵向研究(2004-2019)中的时间序列研究。
BMC Med. 2024 Jun 26;22(1):268. doi: 10.1186/s12916-024-03464-2.
5
Temporal trends and disparities of population attributable fractions of modifiable risk factors for dementia in China: a time-series study of the China health and retirement longitudinal study (2011-2018).中国痴呆症可改变风险因素的人群归因分数的时间趋势和差异:基于中国健康与养老追踪调查(2011 - 2018年)的时间序列研究
Lancet Reg Health West Pac. 2024 May 29;47:101106. doi: 10.1016/j.lanwpc.2024.101106. eCollection 2024 Jun.
6
Population attributable fractions of modifiable risk factors for dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.可改变的痴呆风险因素的人群归因分数:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
Lancet Healthy Longev. 2024 Jun;5(6):e406-e421. doi: 10.1016/S2666-7568(24)00061-8.
7
Population attributable fraction in textbooks: Time to revise.教科书中的人群归因分数:是时候修订了。
Glob Epidemiol. 2021 Aug 28;3:100062. doi: 10.1016/j.gloepi.2021.100062. eCollection 2021 Nov.
8
Dementia incidence and population-attributable fraction for dementia risk factors in Republic of Korea: a 12-year longitudinal follow-up study of a national cohort.韩国痴呆症发病率及痴呆症风险因素的人群归因分数:一项对全国队列的12年纵向随访研究。
Front Aging Neurosci. 2023 Jul 13;15:1126587. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2023.1126587. eCollection 2023.
9
Sex- and age-specific impacts of smoking, overweight/obesity, hypertension, and diabetes mellitus in the development of disabling dementia in a Japanese population.在日本人群中,吸烟、超重/肥胖、高血压和糖尿病对导致失能性痴呆的发展具有性别和年龄特异性影响。
Environ Health Prev Med. 2023;28:11. doi: 10.1265/ehpm.22-00187.
10
Population attributable fraction of modifiable risk factors for dementia in Chile.智利痴呆症可改变风险因素的人群归因分数
Alzheimers Dement (Amst). 2022 Feb 23;14(1):e12273. doi: 10.1002/dad2.12273. eCollection 2022.
利用初级保健医生进行的标准临床评估来识别痴呆症。
Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2018 May;18(5):738-744. doi: 10.1111/ggi.13243. Epub 2018 Jan 16.
4
An additive effect of leading role in the organization between social participation and dementia onset among Japanese older adults: the AGES cohort study.在日本老年人中,社会参与和痴呆发病之间,组织中的领导作用具有相加效应:AGES 队列研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2017 Dec 29;17(1):297. doi: 10.1186/s12877-017-0688-9.
5
Prevalence of Obesity Among Adults and Youth: United States, 2015-2016.2015 - 2016年美国成年人及青少年肥胖症患病率
NCHS Data Brief. 2017 Oct(288):1-8.
6
Proportion of dementia in Australia explained by common modifiable risk factors.澳大利亚痴呆症病例中可通过常见可改变风险因素解释的比例。
Alzheimers Res Ther. 2017 Feb 17;9(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s13195-017-0238-x.
7
Predictive ability of a simple subjective memory complaints scale for incident dementia: Evaluation of Japan's national checklist, the "Kihon Checklist".简单主观记忆抱怨量表预测新发痴呆的能力:日本国家清单“基本清单”的评估。
Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2017 Sep;17(9):1300-1305. doi: 10.1111/ggi.12864. Epub 2016 Aug 10.
8
Potential for primary prevention of Alzheimer's disease: an analysis of population-based data.阿尔茨海默病的一级预防潜力:基于人群数据分析。
Lancet Neurol. 2014 Aug;13(8):788-94. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(14)70136-X.
9
Healthy lifestyles reduce the incidence of chronic diseases and dementia: evidence from the Caerphilly cohort study.健康的生活方式可降低慢性病和痴呆症的发病率:来自卡菲利队列研究的证据。
PLoS One. 2013 Dec 9;8(12):e81877. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0081877. eCollection 2013.
10
Prevalence of dementia and dementing diseases in the old-old population in Japan: the Kurihara Project. Implications for Long-Term Care Insurance data.日本老年人群中痴呆症和痴呆相关疾病的流行情况:栗原项目。对长期护理保险数据的启示。
Psychogeriatrics. 2012 Dec;12(4):226-34. doi: 10.1111/j.1479-8301.2012.00406.x.