Department of Medicine, Cleveland VA Hospital, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA.
School of Health Sciences, Miami Dade College, Miami, FL 33132, USA.
J Environ Public Health. 2019 Feb 3;2019:9648761. doi: 10.1155/2019/9648761. eCollection 2019.
Airports may represent significant sources of secondhand smoke (SHS) exposure for both travelers and employees. While previously common smoking rooms have largely disappeared from US airports, smoking continues to occur outdoors at terminal entrances. SHS may be especially high at arrival areas, since they oftentimes are partially enclosed by overhead departures, creating stagnant microenvironments. This study assessed particulate matter <2.5 microns in diameter (PM2.5), a common surrogate for SHS, at airport terminal locations to evaluate both outdoor exposure risk and possible indoor drift of SHS from outdoor sources.
A convenience sample of nine airport terminal arrival areas in the US state of Florida was surveyed between February and July 2018. PM2.5 levels were assessed outdoors and indoors at terminal entrances and at control areas far into terminal interiors. We also examined the impact of smoking location on SHS exposure by correlating cigarette and passing vehicle counts with PM2.5 levels at terminals with contrasting proximity of designated smoking locations to terminal entrances.
Although outdoor PM2.5 levels (mean 17.9, SD 6.1 g/m) were significantly higher than indoors ( < 0.001), there was no difference between indoor areas directly inside terminal entrances and areas much further interior (mean 8.8, SD 2.6 vs mean 8.5, SD 3.0 g/m, =0.49). However, when smoking areas were in close proximity to terminal entrances, the number of lit cigarettes and vehicular traffic per minute predicted 70% of the variance of PM2.5 levels ( < 0.001), which was attributable mostly to the cigarette number ( = 0.83; 95% CI (0.55 to 1.11); < 0.001). This effect was not observed at smoking areas further away.
PM2.5 data did not suggest indoor drift from outside smoking. Nevertheless, absolute exposure outdoors was high and correlated with the location of designated smoking areas. Further studies are needed to examine the effect of microclimate formation on exposure risk.
机场可能是旅客和员工接触二手烟(SHS)的重要来源。虽然美国机场内的吸烟室已基本消失,但在候机楼入口处仍有吸烟现象。由于到达区通常由上方出发层部分封闭,形成停滞的微环境,因此 SHS 含量可能特别高。本研究评估了机场候机楼内直径小于 2.5 微米的颗粒物(PM2.5),这是 SHS 的常用替代物,以评估室外暴露风险和 SHS 从室外源向室内扩散的可能性。
2018 年 2 月至 7 月,在佛罗里达州的九个美国机场候机楼的到达区进行了便利抽样调查。在候机楼入口处的室外和室内以及候机楼内部的控制区域评估了 PM2.5 水平。我们还通过将航站楼内指定吸烟区与候机楼入口的距离与吸烟区与终端入口的距离进行对比,将香烟和过往车辆数量与 PM2.5 水平相关联,来研究吸烟地点对 SHS 暴露的影响。
尽管室外 PM2.5 水平(均值 17.9,标准差 6.1μg/m)明显高于室内(<0.001),但直接在候机楼入口处的室内区域与距离候机楼入口更远的区域之间没有差异(均值 8.8,标准差 2.6 与均值 8.5,标准差 3.0μg/m,=0.49)。然而,当吸烟区靠近候机楼入口时,每分钟点燃的香烟数量和车辆流量可预测 PM2.5 水平的 70%的方差(<0.001),其中主要归因于香烟数量(=0.83;95%CI(0.55 至 1.11);<0.001)。在远离吸烟区的地方,这种影响并未观察到。
PM2.5 数据并未表明室内存在从室外吸烟区飘入的情况。然而,室外的绝对暴露量仍然很高,并且与指定吸烟区的位置相关。需要进一步研究微气候形成对暴露风险的影响。