• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

青光眼患者及老年和青年对照者的光学和超声角膜测厚术测量中央角膜厚度的比较。

Comparison of Central Corneal Thickness Measurements Using Optical and Ultrasound Pachymetry in Glaucoma Patients and Elderly and Young Controls.

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, Medical Faculty Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität, Fetscherstrasse, Dresden, Germany.

出版信息

J Glaucoma. 2019 Jun;28(6):540-545. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000001231.

DOI:10.1097/IJG.0000000000001231
PMID:30855412
Abstract

UNLABELLED

PRéCIS:: Optical and ultrasound pachymetry cannot be used interchangeably in young, healthy adults. In elderly, healthy and glaucoma patients the speed of ultrasound in the cornea increases because of changing corneal biomechanical characteristics in age and disease and the different devices could be used interchangeably.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to compare central corneal thickness (CCT) using optical and ultrasound pachymetry in patients with open-angle glaucoma and young as well as elderly, healthy controls. Further to investigate whether the devices could be used interchangeably.

METHODS

In total, 69 eyes of 41 glaucoma patients, 51 eyes of 32 elderly and 50 eyes of 25 young controls were consecutively included in this cross-sectional observational study. Optical CCT measurements were obtained using the noncontact Specular Microscope CEM-530 (NCSM). Ultrasound pachymetry (USP) was measured using the Pachy Meter SP 3000.

RESULTS

In young subjects (27.2±4.8 y), the mean CCT taken with NCSM and USP was 562.1±33.6 μm and 565.8±35.8 μm, respectively. This was significantly different (USP>NCSM, P=0.019). In elderly subjects (70.6±10.7 y) CCT measured with NCSM (562.5±27.8 μm) compared to USP (564.9±27.1 μm) was not statistically significantly different (P= 0.121). In glaucoma patients (65.0±11.1 y), USP measured thinner CCT values compared to NCSM, without significant differences between the devices (NCSM 525.3±32.3 μm; USP 522.9±33.15 μm; P=0.067). CCT was significantly thinner in comparison to both healthy groups (P< 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In young subjects, ultrasound pachymetry measurements are higher than they are with optical pachymetry. This difference is no longer observed in elderly subjects and is even reversed in glaucoma patients. A higher speed of ultrasound in the cornea due to changing corneal biomechanical properties in the elderly and glaucoma patients could explain this. The devices could be used interchangeably in older and glaucoma patients, but not in young individuals.

摘要

未加标签

摘要:光学和超声角膜测厚仪不能在年轻健康成年人中互换使用。在老年、健康和青光眼患者中,由于角膜生物力学特性随年龄和疾病的变化,以及不同的设备可以互换使用,因此角膜的超声速度会增加。目的:本研究的目的是比较光学和超声角膜测厚仪在开角型青光眼患者以及年轻和老年健康对照组中的中央角膜厚度(CCT)。进一步研究设备是否可以互换使用。方法:本横断面观察性研究共纳入 41 例青光眼患者的 69 只眼、32 例老年患者的 51 只眼和 25 例年轻患者的 50 只眼。使用非接触式共焦显微镜 CEM-530(NCSM)进行光学 CCT 测量。使用 Pachy Meter SP 3000 进行超声角膜测厚(USP)。结果:在年轻受试者(27.2±4.8 岁)中,NCSM 和 USP 测量的平均 CCT 分别为 562.1±33.6μm 和 565.8±35.8μm,两者差异具有统计学意义(USP>NCSM,P=0.019)。在老年受试者(70.6±10.7 岁)中,NCSM 测量的 CCT(562.5±27.8μm)与 USP(564.9±27.1μm)相比无统计学差异(P=0.121)。在青光眼患者(65.0±11.1 岁)中,USP 测量的 CCT 值比 NCSM 薄,但两种设备之间无显著差异(NCSM 525.3±32.3μm;USP 522.9±33.15μm;P=0.067)。与两个健康组相比,CCT 值明显变薄(P<0.001)。结论:在年轻受试者中,超声角膜测厚仪的测量值高于光学角膜测厚仪。在老年受试者中,这种差异不再存在,甚至在青光眼患者中出现逆转。这可能是由于老年和青光眼患者角膜生物力学特性的变化导致角膜内超声速度加快所致。对于老年和青光眼患者,这些设备可以互换使用,但对于年轻个体则不行。

相似文献

1
Comparison of Central Corneal Thickness Measurements Using Optical and Ultrasound Pachymetry in Glaucoma Patients and Elderly and Young Controls.青光眼患者及老年和青年对照者的光学和超声角膜测厚术测量中央角膜厚度的比较。
J Glaucoma. 2019 Jun;28(6):540-545. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000001231.
2
Comparison of Central Corneal Thickness Measurements Using Ultrasonic Pachymetry, Anterior Segment OCT and Noncontact Specular Microscopy.使用超声角膜测厚法、眼前节光学相干断层扫描和非接触式镜面显微镜测量中央角膜厚度的比较。
J Glaucoma. 2017 Oct;26(10):860-865. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000000745.
3
Comparison of central corneal thickness in healthy eyes using ultrasound pachymetry, non-contact specular microscopy and a high-resolution Scheimpflug camera.使用超声测厚法、非接触式角膜内皮显微镜和高分辨率Scheimpflug相机对健康眼睛的中央角膜厚度进行比较。
Int Ophthalmol. 2023 Feb;43(2):363-370. doi: 10.1007/s10792-022-02431-1. Epub 2022 Jul 21.
4
Comparison of Pentacam Scheimpflug camera with ultrasound pachymetry and noncontact specular microscopy in measuring central corneal thickness.Pentacam 眼前节分析系统与超声角膜测厚仪及非接触式角膜内皮显微镜测量中央角膜厚度的比较
Curr Eye Res. 2007 Feb;32(2):89-94. doi: 10.1080/02713680601115010.
5
Comparison of Central Corneal Thickness with Ultrasound Pachymetry, Noncontact Specular Microscopy and Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography.超声角膜测厚仪、非接触式角膜内皮显微镜及频域光学相干断层扫描测量中央角膜厚度的比较
Semin Ophthalmol. 2018;33(6):782-787. doi: 10.1080/08820538.2018.1448091. Epub 2018 Mar 6.
6
Central corneal thickness measurements obtained with anterior segment spectral domain optical coherence tomography compared to ultrasound pachymetry in healthy subjects.在健康受试者中,比较使用眼前节光谱域光学相干断层扫描技术与超声测厚法获得的中央角膜厚度测量值。
Optometry. 2012 May 31;83(5):167-72.
7
Comparison and evaluation of central corneal thickness using 2 new noncontact specular microscopes and conventional pachymetry devices.使用 2 种新型非接触式共焦显微镜和传统角膜测厚仪对中央角膜厚度进行比较和评估。
Cornea. 2014 Jun;33(6):576-81. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000000113.
8
Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements by Pentacam, noncontact specular microscope, and ultrasound pachymetry in normal and post-LASIK eyes.Pentacam、非接触式角膜内皮显微镜和超声测厚法测量正常眼和准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术后眼中央角膜厚度的比较。
Saudi J Ophthalmol. 2009 Oct;23(3-4):181-7. doi: 10.1016/j.sjopt.2009.10.002. Epub 2009 Oct 24.
9
Comparison of Central Corneal Thickness Measured by Standard Ultrasound Pachymetry, Corneal Topography, Tono-Pachymetry and Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography.标准超声角膜测厚法、角膜地形图、眼压-角膜测厚法及眼前节光学相干断层扫描测量中央角膜厚度的比较
Curr Eye Res. 2018 Jul;43(7):866-872. doi: 10.1080/02713683.2018.1461910. Epub 2018 Apr 13.
10
Accuracy of optical coherence tomography (OCT) in pachymetry for glaucoma patients.光学相干断层扫描(OCT)在青光眼患者测厚中的准确性。
BMC Ophthalmol. 2015 Sep 29;15:124. doi: 10.1186/s12886-015-0116-x.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements obtained by OrbscanIIz and ultrasound pachymetry: A concordance study in the usual clinical practice.OrbscanIIz与超声测厚法测量中央角膜厚度的比较:常规临床实践中的一致性研究
Saudi J Ophthalmol. 2023 Mar 9;37(1):10-14. doi: 10.4103/sjopt.Sjopt_82_21. eCollection 2023 Jan-Mar.
2
Monitoring of central corneal thickness after phacoemulsification-comparison of statical and rotating Scheimpflug pachymetry, and spectral-domain OCT.白内障超声乳化术后中央角膜厚度的监测——静态与旋转式Scheimpflug角膜厚度测量法及频域光学相干断层扫描的比较
Int J Ophthalmol. 2022 Aug 18;15(8):1266-1272. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2022.08.07. eCollection 2022.
3
Comparison of corneal tomography using a novel swept-source optical coherence tomographer and rotating Scheimpflug system in normal and keratoconus eyes: repeatability and agreement analysis.
使用新型扫频源光学相干断层扫描仪和旋转Scheimpflug系统对正常眼和圆锥角膜眼进行角膜断层扫描的比较:重复性和一致性分析。
Eye Vis (Lond). 2022 May 23;9(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s40662-022-00290-6.