Shi Yingchen, Yin Ke, Tai Xuecheng, DeMirci Hasan, Hosseinizadeh Ahmad, Hogue Brenda G, Li Haoyuan, Ourmazd Abbas, Schwander Peter, Vartanyants Ivan A, Yoon Chun Hong, Aquila Andrew, Liu Haiguang
Department of Engineering Physics, Tsinghua University, 30 Shuangqing Rd, Haidian, Beijing 100084, People's Republic of China.
Complex Systems Division, Beijing Computational Science Research Centre, 8 E Xibeiwang Rd, Haidian, Beijing 100193, People's Republic of China.
IUCrJ. 2019 Feb 28;6(Pt 2):331-340. doi: 10.1107/S2052252519001854. eCollection 2019 Mar 1.
Using X-ray free-electron lasers (XFELs), it is possible to determine three-dimensional structures of nanoscale particles using single-particle imaging methods. Classification algorithms are needed to sort out the single-particle diffraction patterns from the large amount of XFEL experimental data. However, different methods often yield inconsistent results. This study compared the performance of three classification algorithms: convolutional neural network, graph cut and diffusion map manifold embedding methods. The identified single-particle diffraction data of the PR772 virus particles were assembled in the three-dimensional Fourier space for real-space model reconstruction. The comparison showed that these three classification methods lead to different datasets and subsequently result in different electron density maps of the reconstructed models. Interestingly, the common dataset selected by these three methods improved the quality of the merged diffraction volume, as well as the resolutions of the reconstructed maps.
利用X射线自由电子激光(XFEL),可以使用单粒子成像方法确定纳米级粒子的三维结构。需要分类算法从大量XFEL实验数据中筛选出单粒子衍射图案。然而,不同的方法往往会产生不一致的结果。本研究比较了三种分类算法的性能:卷积神经网络、图割和扩散映射流形嵌入方法。将PR772病毒颗粒的识别出的单粒子衍射数据在三维傅里叶空间中进行组装,以进行实空间模型重建。比较表明,这三种分类方法导致不同的数据集,随后导致重建模型的不同电子密度图。有趣的是,这三种方法选择的公共数据集提高了合并衍射体积的质量以及重建图的分辨率。