Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana.
Department of Medical Laboratory Technology, Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana.
Biomed Res Int. 2019 Feb 5;2019:7467512. doi: 10.1155/2019/7467512. eCollection 2019.
Laboratory results interpretation for diagnostic accuracy and clinical decision-making in this period of evidence-based medicine requires cut-off values or reference ranges that are reflective of the geographical area where the individual resides. Several studies have shown significant differences between and within populations, emphasizing the need for population-specific reference ranges. This cross-sectional experimental study sought to establish the haematological reference values in apparently healthy individuals in three regions in Ghana. Study sites included Nkenkaasu, Winneba, and Nadowli in the Ashanti, Central, and Upper West regions of Ghana, respectively. A total of 488 healthy participants were recruited using the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (United States National Consensus Committee on Laboratory Standards, NCCLS) Guidance Document C28A2. Medians for haematological parameters were calculated and reference values determined at 2.5 and 97.5 percentiles and compared with Caucasian values adopted by our laboratory as reference ranges and values from other African and Western countries. RBC count, haemoglobin, and haematocrit (HCT) were significantly higher in males compared to females. There were significant intraregional and interregional as well as international variations of haematological reference ranges in the populations studied. We conclude that, for each geographical area, there is a need to establish geography-specific reference ranges if accurate diagnosis and concise clinical decisions are to be made.
在这个循证医学的时代,为了进行诊断准确性和临床决策,实验室结果的解读需要反映个体所在地区的截止值或参考范围。有几项研究表明,不同人群和同一人群内部之间存在显著差异,这强调了需要制定特定人群的参考范围。本横断面实验研究旨在确定加纳三个地区的健康个体的血液学参考值。研究地点包括加纳阿散蒂地区的 Nkenkaasu、中部地区的 Winneba 和上西部地区的 Nadowli。总共使用临床和实验室标准协会(美国国家共识委员会关于实验室标准,NCCLS)指导文件 C28A2 招募了 488 名健康参与者。计算血液学参数的中位数,并确定 2.5%和 97.5%百分位数的参考值,并将其与我们实验室采用的高加索值作为参考范围以及来自其他非洲和西方国家的值进行比较。与女性相比,男性的 RBC 计数、血红蛋白和血细胞比容 (HCT) 明显更高。在所研究的人群中,存在显著的区域性和跨区域性以及国际间的血液学参考范围变化。我们得出结论,对于每个地理区域,如果要做出准确的诊断和简明的临床决策,都需要建立特定于该地理区域的参考范围。