Suppr超能文献

一项随机等待期对照试验比较了分离式正念和认知重构在强迫症中的应用。

A randomized waitlist-controlled trial comparing detached mindfulness and cognitive restructuring in obsessive-compulsive disorder.

机构信息

Institute of Psychology, Westfälische Wilhelms-University Münster, Fliednerstrasse 21, Münster, Germany.

Christoph-Dornier-Stiftung, Schorlemerstrasse 26, Münster, Germany.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2019 Mar 20;14(3):e0213895. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0213895. eCollection 2019.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Whereas research has demonstrated the efficacy of cognitive restructuring (CR) for obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), little is known about the efficacy of specific metacognitive interventions such as detached mindfulness (DM). Therefore, this study compared the efficacy of CR and DM as stand-alone interventions.

DESIGN

We conducted a randomized waitlist-controlled trial. n = 43 participants were randomly assigned to either DM or CR. Out of those participants, n = 21 participants had been previously assigned to a two-week waitlist condition.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In both conditions, treatment comprised four double sessions within two weeks. Assessment took place at baseline (Pre1), after treatment (Post) and four weeks after the end of treatment (FU). There was a second baseline assessment (Pre2) in the waitlist group. Independent evaluators were blinded concerning the active condition. Adherence and competence ratings for the two therapists were obtained from an independent rater.

RESULTS

40 patients completed the treatment. Two patients dropped out because of exacerbated depression. There were no further adverse events. Both CR and DM were shown to be superior to waitlist and equally effective at reducing OCD symptoms from pre to post assessment as measured with the Y-BOCS (CR: d = 1.67, DM: d = 1.55). In each of the two treatment conditions, eight patients (40%) exhibited a clinical significant change at post assessment.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this clinical trial suggest the potential efficacy of DM as a stand-alone intervention for OCD, however, our findings need to be interpreted with caution. Results indicate that both CR and DM should be considered as possible alternative treatments for OCD, whereas the working mechanisms of DM have yet to be elucidated.

摘要

目的

虽然研究已经证明认知重构(CR)对强迫症(OCD)有效,但对于特定的元认知干预措施(如分离正念)的效果知之甚少。因此,本研究比较了 CR 和 DM 作为独立干预措施的疗效。

设计

我们进行了一项随机等待对照试验。43 名参与者被随机分配到 DM 或 CR 组。其中 21 名参与者之前被分配到两周的等待条件。

材料和方法

在两种情况下,治疗都包括两周内的四次双次治疗。评估在基线(Pre1)、治疗后(Post)和治疗结束后四周(FU)进行。等待组进行了第二次基线评估(Pre2)。独立评估者对活跃条件进行了盲法评估。两位治疗师的依从性和能力评分由独立评估者获得。

结果

40 名患者完成了治疗。有两名患者因抑郁加重而退出。没有其他不良事件。CR 和 DM 都明显优于等待组,并且在治疗后与治疗前相比,Y-BOCS(CR:d = 1.67,DM:d = 1.55)都能更有效地减轻 OCD 症状。在两种治疗条件下,治疗后有八名患者(40%)表现出临床显著变化。

结论

这项临床试验的结果表明,DM 作为 OCD 的独立干预措施具有潜在的疗效,但是,我们的发现需要谨慎解释。结果表明,CR 和 DM 都应该被认为是 OCD 的可能替代治疗方法,而 DM 的作用机制仍有待阐明。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2969/6426247/6ed2b109342b/pone.0213895.g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验