• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与公众就恐怖主义持枪袭击进行沟通:影响英国和丹麦“跑、藏、报”意愿的因素调查实验结果。

Communicating with the Public About Marauding Terrorist Firearms Attacks: Results from a Survey Experiment on Factors Influencing Intention to "Run, Hide, Tell" in the United Kingdom and Denmark.

机构信息

Department of War Studies, King's College London, London, UK.

Department of Political Science, Aarhus University, Bartholins Alle, Aarhus C, Denmark.

出版信息

Risk Anal. 2019 Aug;39(8):1675-1694. doi: 10.1111/risa.13301. Epub 2019 Mar 20.

DOI:10.1111/risa.13301
PMID:30893483
Abstract

Effective risk communication is an integral part of responding to terrorism, but until recently, there has been very little pre-event communication in a European context to provide advice to the public on how to protect themselves during an attack. Following terrorist attacks involving mass shootings in Paris, France, in November 2015, the U.K. National Police Chiefs' Council released a Stay Safe film and leaflet that advises the public to "run," "hide," and "tell" in the event of a firearms or weapons attack. However, other countries, including Denmark, do not provide preparedness information of this kind, in large part because of concern about scaring the public. In this survey experiment, 3,003 U.K. and Danish participants were randomly assigned to one of three conditions: no information, a leaflet intervention, and a film intervention to examine the impact of "Run, Hide, Tell" advice on perceptions about terrorism, the security services, and intended responses to a hypothetical terrorist firearms attack. Results demonstrate important benefits of pre-event communication in relation to enhancing trust, encouraging protective health behaviors, and discouraging potentially dangerous actions. However, these findings also suggest that future communications should address perceived response costs and target specific problem behaviors. Cross-national similarities in response suggest this advice is suitable for adaptation in other countries.

摘要

有效的风险沟通是应对恐怖主义的一个组成部分,但直到最近,在欧洲背景下,几乎没有事先的沟通来向公众提供在袭击中如何保护自己的建议。在 2015 年 11 月法国巴黎发生涉及大规模枪击的恐怖袭击后,英国国家警察局长理事会发布了一部《保持安全》的电影和传单,建议公众在发生枪支或武器袭击时“逃跑”、“躲藏”和“报告”。然而,包括丹麦在内的其他国家并没有提供这种准备信息,这在很大程度上是因为担心吓唬公众。在这项调查实验中,3003 名英国和丹麦参与者被随机分配到以下三种条件之一:无信息、传单干预和电影干预,以检验“逃跑、躲藏、报告”建议对恐怖主义、安全服务和对假设的恐怖主义枪支袭击的预期反应的影响。结果表明,预先沟通在增强信任、鼓励保护健康行为和阻止潜在危险行为方面具有重要的好处。然而,这些发现也表明,未来的沟通应该解决感知到的反应成本,并针对特定的问题行为。在应对方面的跨国相似性表明,这种建议适合在其他国家进行改编。

相似文献

1
Communicating with the Public About Marauding Terrorist Firearms Attacks: Results from a Survey Experiment on Factors Influencing Intention to "Run, Hide, Tell" in the United Kingdom and Denmark.与公众就恐怖主义持枪袭击进行沟通:影响英国和丹麦“跑、藏、报”意愿的因素调查实验结果。
Risk Anal. 2019 Aug;39(8):1675-1694. doi: 10.1111/risa.13301. Epub 2019 Mar 20.
2
Emergency Response to Radiological Releases: Have We Communicated Effectively to the First Responder Communities to Prepare Them to Safely Manage These Incidents?放射性物质释放的应急响应:我们是否已与应急响应人员群体进行了有效沟通,使其做好安全应对这些事件的准备?
Health Phys. 2018 Feb;114(2):208-213. doi: 10.1097/HP.0000000000000757.
3
Responding to the marauding terror attack: the police perspective.应对肆虐的恐怖袭击:警方视角。
BMJ Mil Health. 2020 Apr;166(2):80-83. doi: 10.1136/jramc-2018-000960. Epub 2018 Jul 16.
4
Marauding terrorist attack (MTA): prehospital considerations.暴恐袭击(MTA):院前相关问题。
Emerg Med J. 2018 Jun;35(6):389-395. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2017-206959. Epub 2018 Mar 23.
5
Preparedness and response to terrorism: a framework for public health action.对恐怖主义的防范与应对:公共卫生行动框架
Eur J Public Health. 2005 Feb;15(1):100-4. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/cki127.
6
Public health preparedness for maritime terrorist attacks on ports and coastal waters.针对港口和沿海水域海上恐怖袭击的公共卫生防范措施。
Am J Disaster Med. 2008 Nov-Dec;3(6):377-84.
7
Mediating the social and psychological impacts of terrorist attacks: the role of risk perception and risk communication.调解恐怖袭击的社会和心理影响:风险认知与风险沟通的作用。
Int Rev Psychiatry. 2007 Jun;19(3):279-88. doi: 10.1080/09540260701349373.
8
Chemical or biological terrorist attacks: an analysis of the preparedness of hospitals for managing victims affected by chemical or biological weapons of mass destruction.化学或生物恐怖袭击:医院应对大规模杀伤性化学或生物武器受害者的准备情况分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2006 Mar;3(1):67-75. doi: 10.3390/ijerph2006030008.
9
Police chiefs' perceptions of the regulation of firearms.警察局长对枪支管制的看法。
Am J Prev Med. 2006 Apr;30(4):305-312. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2005.11.009.
10
Fear of terrorism in New York after the September 11 terrorist attacks: implications for emergency mental health and preparedness.9·11恐怖袭击后纽约对恐怖主义的恐惧:对紧急心理健康和防范的影响。
Int J Emerg Ment Health. 2003 Fall;5(4):199-209.

引用本文的文献

1
The zero responder: a definition and report of current literature.零反应者:定义及当前文献报告
Br Paramed J. 2024 Sep 1;9(2):38-43. doi: 10.29045/14784726.2024.9.9.2.38.
2
Criminal justice interventions for preventing radicalisation, violent extremism and terrorism: An evidence and gap map.预防激进化、暴力极端主义和恐怖主义的刑事司法干预措施:证据与差距图谱
Campbell Syst Rev. 2023 Nov 14;19(4):e1366. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1366. eCollection 2023 Dec.
3
Facilitators and barriers of preventive behaviors against COVID-19 during Ramadan: A phenomenology of Indonesian adults.
在斋月期间预防 COVID-19 的行为的促进因素和障碍:印度尼西亚成年人的现象学研究。
Front Public Health. 2023 Mar 21;11:960500. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.960500. eCollection 2023.
4
The effect of self-disclosure on mass trust through TikTok: An empirical study of short video streaming application users.通过TikTok进行自我表露对大众信任的影响:短视频流媒体应用用户的实证研究
Front Psychol. 2022 Aug 18;13:968558. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.968558. eCollection 2022.
5
The Double Bind of Communicating About Zoonotic Origins: Describing Exotic Animal Sources of COVID-19 Increases Both Healthy and Discriminatory Avoidance Intentions.关于人畜共患病起源的沟通困境:描述新冠病毒的外来动物源头会增加健康及歧视性的回避意图。
Risk Anal. 2022 Mar;42(3):506-521. doi: 10.1111/risa.13764. Epub 2021 Jun 2.
6
Compliance without fear: Individual-level protective behaviour during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic.无惧合规:COVID-19 大流行第一波期间的个体层面保护行为。
Br J Health Psychol. 2021 May;26(2):679-696. doi: 10.1111/bjhp.12519. Epub 2021 Mar 24.
7
Reducing SARS-CoV-2 transmission in the UK: A behavioural science approach to identifying options for increasing adherence to social distancing and shielding vulnerable people.减少英国的 SARS-CoV-2 传播:一种行为科学方法,用于确定增加社会隔离和保护弱势群体的依从性的选择。
Br J Health Psychol. 2020 Nov;25(4):945-956. doi: 10.1111/bjhp.12428. Epub 2020 May 19.