Assefa Yared, Purcell Larry C, Salmeron Montse, Naeve Seth, Casteel Shaun N, Kovács Péter, Archontoulis Sotirios, Licht Mark, Below Fred, Kandel Herman, Lindsey Laura E, Gaska John, Conley Shawn, Shapiro Charles, Orlowski John M, Golden Bobby R, Kaur Gurpreet, Singh Maninderpal, Thelen Kurt, Laurenz Randall, Davidson Dan, Ciampitti Ignacio A
Department of Agronomy, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, United States.
Department of Crop, Soil, and Environmental Sciences, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, United States.
Front Plant Sci. 2019 Mar 11;10:298. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2019.00298. eCollection 2019.
Soybean [ (L.) Merr.] seed composition and yield are a function of genetics (G), environment (E), and management (M) practices, but contribution of each factor to seed composition and yield are not well understood. The goal of this synthesis-analysis was to identify the main effects of G, E, and M factors on seed composition (protein and oil concentration) and yield. The entire dataset (13,574 data points) consisted of 21 studies conducted across the United States (US) between 2002 and 2017 with varying treatments and all reporting seed yield and composition. Environment (E), defined as site-year, was the dominant factor accounting for more than 70% of the variation for both seed composition and yield. Of the crop management factors: (i) delayed planting date decreased oil concentration by 0.007 to 0.06% per delayed week ( ∼0.70) and a 0.01 to 0.04 Mg ha decline in seed yield per week, mainly in northern latitudes (40-45 N); (ii) crop rotation (corn-soybean) resulted in an overall positive impact for both seed composition and yield (1.60 Mg ha positive yield difference relative to continuous soybean); and (iii) other management practices such as no-till, seed treatment, foliar nutrient application, and fungicide showed mixed results. Fertilizer N application in lower quantities (10-50 kg N ha) increased both oil and protein concentration, but seed yield was improved with rates above 100 kg N ha. At southern latitudes (30-35 N), trends of reduction in oil and increases in protein concentrations with later maturity groups (MG, from 3 to 7) was found. Continuing coordinated research is critical to advance our understanding of G × E × M interactions.
大豆[ (L.) Merr.]种子的成分和产量是遗传因素(G)、环境因素(E)和管理措施(M)共同作用的结果,但各因素对种子成分和产量的贡献尚未完全明确。本综合分析的目的是确定G、E和M因素对种子成分(蛋白质和油含量)及产量的主要影响。整个数据集(13574个数据点)由2002年至2017年间在美国开展的21项研究组成,这些研究采用了不同的处理方式,均报告了种子产量和成分。环境因素(E),定义为地点-年份,是主导因素,占种子成分和产量变异的70%以上。在作物管理因素方面:(i)播种日期推迟,油含量每周降低0.007%至0.06%(约0.70),种子产量每周下降0.01至0.04 Mg/ha,主要发生在北纬地区(40-45°N);(ii)作物轮作(玉米-大豆)对种子成分和产量均产生总体积极影响(相对于连作大豆,产量差异为正1.60 Mg/ha);(iii)免耕、种子处理、叶面施肥和杀菌剂等其他管理措施效果不一。低量施氮(10-50 kg N/ha)可提高油和蛋白质含量,但施氮量超过100 kg N/ha时种子产量才会提高。在南纬地区(30-35°N),发现随着成熟组(MG,从3到7)变晚,油含量降低、蛋白质含量增加的趋势。持续开展协同研究对于增进我们对G×E×M相互作用的理解至关重要。