MRC/UVRI and LSHTM Uganda Research Unit, Entebbe Uganda.
London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London United Kingdom.
PLoS One. 2019 Mar 27;14(3):e0210719. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0210719. eCollection 2019.
OBJECTIVE: We assessed feasibility of an HIV-combination-prevention trial among fishing communities in Uganda. DESIGN: Cluster randomised trial in four fishing communities on Lake Victoria, Uganda. Two intervention communities received a combination-prevention-package (behaviour change communication, condom promotion, HIV testing, voluntary male medical circumcision and referral for anti-retroviral therapy if HIV-positive). All four communities received routine government HIV care services. METHODS: Using household census data we randomly selected a cohort of consenting residents aged ≥18 years. A baseline sero-survey in July 2014 was followed by two repeat surveys in March and December 2015. We measured uptake of HIV prevention methods, loss-to-follow-up and HIV incidence, accounting for multistage survey design. RESULTS: A total of 862 participants were enrolled and followed for 15 months. Participation was 62% and 74% in the control and intervention arms respectively; Overall loss to follow up (LTFU) was 21.6% and was similar by arm. Self-reported abstinence/faithfulness increased between baseline and endline in both arms from 53% to 73% in the control arm, and 55% to 67% in the intervention arm. Reported condom use throughout the study period was 36% in the intervention arm vs 28% in the control arm; number of male participants reporting circumsicion in both arms from 58% to 79% in the intervention arm, and 39% to 46% in the control arm. Independent baseline predictors of loss-to-follow-up were: being HIV positive, residence in the community for <1 year, younger age, living in an urban area, and being away from the area for >1 month/year. CONCLUSIONS: Recruitment and retention of participants in longitudinal trials in highly mobile HIV fishing communities is challenging. Future research should investigate modes for locating and retaining participants, and delivery of HIV-combination prevention.
目的:评估在乌干达维多利亚湖捕鱼社区开展 HIV 综合预防试验的可行性。 设计:在乌干达维多利亚湖的四个捕鱼社区进行了一项集群随机试验。两个干预社区接受了综合预防一揽子计划(行为改变交流、推广避孕套、HIV 检测、自愿男性医疗环切术,如果 HIV 阳性则转介抗逆转录病毒治疗)。所有四个社区都获得了常规的政府 HIV 护理服务。 方法:利用家庭普查数据,我们随机选择了一组年龄在≥18 岁的同意居民。2014 年 7 月进行基线血清学调查,随后于 2015 年 3 月和 12 月进行了两次重复调查。我们测量了 HIV 预防方法的采用率、失访率和 HIV 发病率,并考虑了多阶段调查设计。 结果:共招募了 862 名参与者,并随访了 15 个月。对照组和干预组的参与率分别为 62%和 74%;总的失访率(LTFU)为 21.6%,两组之间相似。在基线和终点时,对照组的自我报告的禁欲/忠诚从 53%增加到 73%,干预组从 55%增加到 67%。在研究期间报告的避孕套使用率,干预组为 36%,对照组为 28%;在干预组和对照组中,报告环切术的男性参与者人数从 58%增加到 79%,从 39%增加到 46%。失访的独立基线预测因素包括:HIV 阳性、在社区居住不到 1 年、年龄较小、居住在城市地区以及每年离开该地区超过 1 个月。 结论:在高度流动的 HIV 捕鱼社区中开展纵向试验的参与者招募和保留具有挑战性。未来的研究应调查定位和保留参与者的模式,以及提供 HIV 综合预防的模式。