Guilamet Maria Cristina Vazquez, Bernauer Michael, Micek Scott T, Kollef Marin H
Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine.
Division of Infectious Diseases, University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Albuquerque, NM.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Apr;98(16):e15276. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000015276.
Prior attempts at identifying outcome determinants associated with bloodstream infection have employed a priori determined classification schemes based on readily identifiable microbiology, infection site, and patient characteristics. We hypothesized that even amongst this heterogeneous population, clinically relevant groupings can be described that transcend old a priori classifications.We applied cluster analysis to variables from three domains: patient characteristics, acuity of illness/clinical presentation and infection characteristics. We validated our clusters based on both content validity and predictive validity.Among 3715 patients with bloodstream infections from Barnes-Jewish Hospital (2008-2015), the most stable cluster arrangement occurred with the formation of 4 clusters. This clustering arrangement resulted in an approximately uniform distribution of the population: Cluster One "Surgical Outside Hospital Transfers" (21.5%), Cluster Two "Functional Immunocompromised Patients" (27.9%), Cluster Three "Women with Skin and Urinary Tract Infection" (28.7%) and Cluster Four "Acutely Sick Pneumonia" (21.8%). Staphylococcus aureus distributed primarily to Clusters Three (40%) and Four (25%), while nonfermenting Gram-negative bacteria grouped mainly in Clusters Two and Four (31% and 30%). More than half of the pneumonia cases occurred in Cluster Four. Clusters One and Two contained 33% and 31% respectively of the individuals receiving inappropriate antibiotic administration. Mortality was greatest for Cluster Four (33.8%, 27.4%, 19.2%, 44.6%; P < .001), while Cluster One patients were most likely to be discharged to a nursing home.Our results support the potential for machine learning methods to identify homogenous groupings in infectious diseases that transcend old a priori classifications. These methods may allow new clinical phenotypes to be identified potentially improving the severity staging and development of new treatments for complex infectious diseases.
此前,在确定与血流感染相关的预后决定因素时,研究人员采用了基于易于识别的微生物学、感染部位和患者特征的预先确定的分类方案。我们假设,即使在这个异质性群体中,也可以描述出超越旧有预先分类的临床相关分组。我们将聚类分析应用于来自三个领域的变量:患者特征、疾病严重程度/临床表现和感染特征。我们基于内容效度和预测效度对聚类结果进行了验证。在巴恩斯-犹太医院(2008 - 2015年)的3715例血流感染患者中,最稳定的聚类安排是形成4个聚类。这种聚类安排导致人群大致均匀分布:第一类“院外手术转入患者”(21.5%),第二类“功能性免疫功能低下患者”(27.9%),第三类“皮肤和尿路感染的女性患者”(28.7%),第四类“急性重症肺炎患者”(21.8%)。金黄色葡萄球菌主要分布在第三类(40%)和第四类(25%),而非发酵革兰氏阴性菌主要聚集在第二类和第四类(分别为31%和30%)。超过一半的肺炎病例发生在第四类。第一类和第二类中分别有33%和31%的个体接受了不恰当的抗生素治疗。第四类的死亡率最高(33.8%,27.4%,19.2%,44.6%;P<0.001),而第一类患者最有可能出院后入住疗养院。我们的结果支持了机器学习方法在识别超越旧有预先分类的传染病同质分组方面的潜力。这些方法可能有助于识别新的临床表型,从而有可能改善复杂传染病的严重程度分期和新治疗方法的开发。