Reid Heleen A J, Hocking Clare, Smythe Liz
Can J Occup Ther. 2019 Oct;86(4):313-325. doi: 10.1177/0008417419833413. Epub 2019 Apr 25.
BACKGROUND.: Models provide a structure for organizing knowledge and facilitating learning and are upheld by occupational therapy as epitomizing the cornerstones of its practice.
PURPOSE.: This article briefly examines the scientific history of occupation-based model development in the 1950s before addressing the process of conceptual model making in occupational therapy. Using the theory of semiosis, it explains and takes a critical perspective on conceptual model building in occupational therapy.
KEY ISSUES.: Since the surge of development in the mid-1970s, models have grown and undergone some revision. However, while the profession has often contested the definitions of its core terms, it has not challenged the accepted models and diagrams that present the constituents of practice.
IMPLICATIONS.: Examining the processes of conceptual model development from a critical, semiotic point of view foregrounds models in the historico-theoretical literature and brings into scrutiny a model's relevancy in current practice.
模型为组织知识和促进学习提供了一种结构,被职业治疗视为其实践基石的典范。
本文在探讨职业治疗中概念模型构建过程之前,简要回顾了20世纪50年代基于职业的模型发展的科学史。运用符号学理论,对职业治疗中的概念模型构建进行解释并持批判性观点。
自20世纪70年代中期发展热潮以来,模型不断发展并经历了一些修订。然而,尽管该专业经常对其核心术语的定义存在争议,但并未对呈现实践要素的公认模型和图表提出质疑。
从批判性的符号学角度审视概念模型的发展过程,将模型置于历史理论文献的突出位置,并对模型在当前实践中的相关性进行审视。