From the Division of Geriatric Medicine, Department of Medicine (H.D.L., S.R.J., A.B.), College of Nursing (R.A., J.J.), and Department of Neurology (B.K.), University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora; VA Eastern Colorado Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center (H.D.L.); Denver-Seattle Center of Innovation (R.A.), Rocky Mountain Regional Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Denver, CO; Movement Disorders and Neuromodulation Center (M.K.) and Research Stakeholder (A.H.), University of California, San Francisco; and Division of Neurology (J.M.M.), University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
Neurology. 2019 May 28;92(22):e2571-e2579. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000007552. Epub 2019 Apr 26.
Advance care planning (ACP) is a core quality measure in caring for individuals with Parkinson disease (PD) and there are no best practice standards for how to incorporate ACP into PD care. This study describes patient and care partner perspectives on ACP to inform a patient- and care partner-centered framework for clinical care.
This is a qualitative descriptive study of 30 patients with PD and 30 care partners within a multisite, randomized clinical trial of neuropalliative care compared to standard care. Participants were individually interviewed about perspectives on ACP, including prior and current experiences, barriers to ACP, and suggestions for integration into care. Interviews were analyzed using theme analysis to identify key themes.
Four themes illustrate how patients and care partners perceive ACP as part of clinical care: (1) personal definitions of ACP vary in the context of PD; (2) patient, relationship, and health care system barriers exist to engaging in ACP; (3) care partners play an active role in ACP; (4) a palliative care approach positively influences ACP. Taken together, the themes support clinician initiation of ACP discussions and interdisciplinary approaches to help patients and care partners overcome barriers to ACP.
ACP in PD may be influenced by patient and care partner perceptions and misperceptions, symptoms of PD (e.g., apathy, cognitive dysfunction, disease severity), and models of clinical care. Optimal engagement of patients with PD and care partners in ACP should proactively address misperceptions of ACP and utilize clinic teams and workflow routines to incorporate ACP into regular care.
预先医疗指示(ACP)是照顾帕金森病(PD)患者的核心质量指标,但目前尚无将 ACP 纳入 PD 护理的最佳实践标准。本研究描述了患者和护理者对 ACP 的看法,为以患者和护理者为中心的临床护理框架提供信息。
这是一项针对 30 名 PD 患者和 30 名护理者的定性描述性研究,这些患者和护理者来自一项神经姑息治疗与标准护理的多中心随机临床试验。参与者单独接受了关于 ACP 看法的访谈,包括既往和当前的经验、ACP 的障碍以及整合到护理中的建议。使用主题分析对访谈进行分析,以确定关键主题。
四个主题说明了患者和护理者如何将 ACP 视为临床护理的一部分:(1)在 PD 背景下,个人对 ACP 的定义各不相同;(2)患者、关系和医疗保健系统存在参与 ACP 的障碍;(3)护理者在 ACP 中发挥积极作用;(4)姑息治疗方法对 ACP 有积极影响。总的来说,这些主题支持临床医生发起 ACP 讨论和跨学科方法,以帮助患者和护理者克服 ACP 的障碍。
PD 中的 ACP 可能受到患者和护理者的看法和误解、PD 症状(如冷漠、认知功能障碍、疾病严重程度)以及临床护理模式的影响。为了让 PD 患者和护理者积极参与 ACP,应主动解决对 ACP 的误解,并利用临床团队和工作流程常规将 ACP 纳入常规护理。