Vaughn Sharon, Roberts Greg, Capin Philip, Miciak Jeremy, Cho Eunsoo, Fletcher Jack M
The University of Texas at Austin.
University of Houston.
Except Child. 2019 Jan;85(2):180-196. doi: 10.1177/0014402918782618. Epub 2018 Oct 8.
This study examined how differences in listening comprehension and word reading at the beginning of the school year influence changes in reading comprehension for English learners (ELs) with significant reading difficulties compared to non-ELs with significant reading difficulties. The study investigated heterogeneity in response to instruction among 400 struggling readers in fourth grade ( = 183 for non-EL; = 217 for EL) who received an intensive reading intervention. At pretest, word reading, listening comprehension, and reading comprehension were measured, and at posttest, reading comprehension was measured again. Results from moderated multiple regression analyses showed a significant three-way interaction such that reading comprehension at posttest was higher for ELs than non-ELs with similar levels of low word reading but relatively higher levels of listening comprehension. However, non-ELs outperformed ELs with similar levels of relatively high word reading and average to high listening comprehension. The findings suggest that pre-intervention skill profiles may need to be interpreted differently for ELs and non-ELs with significant reading difficulties in relation to language and literacy outcomes.
本研究考察了学年开始时听力理解和单词阅读方面的差异如何影响有显著阅读困难的英语学习者(ELs)与有显著阅读困难的非英语学习者相比在阅读理解方面的变化。该研究调查了400名四年级阅读困难学生(非英语学习者183名;英语学习者217名)在接受强化阅读干预后对教学反应的异质性。在预测试中,测量了单词阅读、听力理解和阅读理解,在后测试中,再次测量了阅读理解。调节多元回归分析的结果显示了一个显著的三向交互作用,即对于单词阅读水平低但听力理解水平相对较高的情况,后测试中的阅读理解对于英语学习者高于非英语学习者。然而,对于单词阅读水平相对较高且听力理解水平为中等至高的情况,非英语学习者的表现优于英语学习者。研究结果表明,对于有显著阅读困难的英语学习者和非英语学习者,在语言和读写能力结果方面,干预前的技能概况可能需要以不同方式进行解读。