Read Donna M Y, Dalton Hazel, Booth Angela, Goodwin Nick, Hendry Anne, Perkins David
Centre for Rural and Remote Mental Health, University of Newcastle, NSW, AU.
International Foundation for Integrated Care, Wolfson College, Oxford, UK.
Int J Integr Care. 2019 Jun 21;19(2):10. doi: 10.5334/ijic.4624.
Integrated care implies sustained change in complex systems and progress is not always linear or easy to assess. The Central Coast integrated Care Program (CCICP) was planned as a ten-year place-based system change. This paper reports the first formative evaluation to provide a detailed description of the implementation of the CCICP, after two years of activity, and the current progress towards integrated care.
Progress towards integrated care achieved by the CCICP was evaluated using the Project INTEGRATE Framework data in a mixed methods approach included semi-structured interviews (n = 23) and Project INTEGRATE Framework based surveys (n = 27). All data collected involved key stakeholders, with close involvement in the program, self-reporting.
Progress has been mixed. Gains had most clearly been made in the areas of clinical and professional integration; specifically, relationship building and improved collaboration and cooperation between service providers. The areas of systemic and functional integration were least improved with funding uncertainty being an ongoing significant problem. The evaluation also showed that the Project INTEGRATE framework provided a consistent language for CCICP partners and for evaluators and consistent indicators of progress. The framework also helped to identify key facilitators and barriers.
The findings highlight the willingness and commitment of key staff but also the importance of leadership, good communication, relationship building, and cultural transformation.
整合照护意味着复杂系统的持续变革,其进展并非总是呈线性,也不易评估。中央海岸整合照护项目(CCICP)计划作为一项为期十年的基于地点的系统变革。本文报告了首次形成性评估,以详细描述CCICP在开展两年活动后的实施情况以及当前在整合照护方面取得的进展。
使用“整合项目”框架数据,采用混合方法评估CCICP在整合照护方面取得的进展,该方法包括半结构化访谈(n = 23)和基于“整合项目”框架的调查(n = 27)。所有收集的数据均涉及关键利益相关者,他们密切参与该项目并进行自我报告。
进展有好有坏。在临床和专业整合领域取得的成果最为明显;具体而言,服务提供者之间建立了关系,协作与合作得到改善。系统和功能整合领域改善最少,资金不确定性仍是一个持续存在的重大问题。评估还表明,“整合项目”框架为CCICP合作伙伴和评估人员提供了一致的语言以及一致的进展指标。该框架还有助于识别关键促进因素和障碍。
研究结果凸显了关键工作人员的意愿和承诺,同时也强调了领导力、良好沟通、关系建立和文化变革的重要性。