• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对嗅觉客体的批判

A Critique of Olfactory Objects.

作者信息

Barwich Ann-Sophie

机构信息

Cognitive Science Program, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, United States.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2019 Jun 12;10:1337. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01337. eCollection 2019.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01337
PMID:31244733
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6581715/
Abstract

Does the sense of smell involve the perception of odor objects? General discussion of perceptual objecthood centers on three criteria: stimulus representation, perceptual constancy, and figure-ground segregation. These criteria, derived from theories of vision, have been applied to olfaction in recent philosophical debates about psychology. An inherent problem with such framing of olfactory objecthood is that philosophers explicitly ignore the constitutive factors of the sensory systems that underpin the implementation of these criteria. The biological basis of odor coding is fundamentally different from the coding principles of the visual system. This article analyzes the three measures of perceptual objecthood against the biological background of the olfactory system. It contrasts the coding principles in olfaction with the visual system to show why these criteria of objecthood fail to be instantiated in odor perception. The argument demonstrates that olfaction affords perceptual categorization without the need to form odor objects.

摘要

嗅觉是否涉及对气味对象的感知?关于感知对象性的一般讨论集中在三个标准上:刺激表征、感知恒常性和图形-背景分离。这些源自视觉理论的标准,在最近关于心理学的哲学辩论中已被应用于嗅觉。这种对嗅觉对象性的框架存在一个内在问题,即哲学家们明确忽略了支撑这些标准实施的感觉系统的构成因素。气味编码的生物学基础与视觉系统的编码原则根本不同。本文在嗅觉系统的生物学背景下分析了感知对象性的三个衡量标准。它将嗅觉中的编码原则与视觉系统进行对比,以说明为什么这些对象性标准无法在气味感知中得到体现。该论点表明,嗅觉提供了感知分类,而无需形成气味对象。

相似文献

1
A Critique of Olfactory Objects.对嗅觉客体的批判
Front Psychol. 2019 Jun 12;10:1337. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01337. eCollection 2019.
2
Performance of a Computational Model of the Mammalian Olfactory System哺乳动物嗅觉系统计算模型的性能
3
Engineering Aspects of Olfaction嗅觉的工程学方面
4
Understanding smell--the olfactory stimulus problem.理解嗅觉——嗅觉刺激问题。
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2013 Sep;37(8):1667-79. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2013.06.009. Epub 2013 Jun 25.
5
The Synthetic Moth: A Neuromorphic Approach toward Artificial Olfaction in Robots合成蛾:一种用于机器人人工嗅觉的神经形态方法
6
Olfactory perception of chemically diverse molecules.对化学性质多样的分子的嗅觉感知。
BMC Neurosci. 2016 Aug 8;17(1):55. doi: 10.1186/s12868-016-0287-2.
7
Cortical contributions to olfaction: plasticity and perception.皮层对嗅觉的作用:可塑性与感知
Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2006 Aug;17(4):462-70. doi: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2006.04.008. Epub 2006 May 5.
8
History-Dependent Odor Processing in the Mouse Olfactory Bulb.小鼠嗅球中依赖于历史的气味处理
J Neurosci. 2017 Dec 6;37(49):12018-12030. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0755-17.2017. Epub 2017 Nov 6.
9
The perception of odor is not a surrogate marker for chemical exposure: a review of factors influencing human odor perception.气味感知不能作为化学暴露的替代标志物:影响人类气味感知的因素综述。
Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2013 Feb;51(2):70-6. doi: 10.3109/15563650.2013.767908.
10
A primacy code for odor identity.气味身份的首要代码。
Nat Commun. 2017 Nov 14;8(1):1477. doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-01432-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Odors as cognitive constructs: history of odor classification and attempts to map odor percepts to physical and chemical parameters.作为认知结构的气味:气味分类的历史以及将气味感知映射到物理和化学参数的尝试。
Chem Senses. 2025 Jan 22;50. doi: 10.1093/chemse/bjaf022.
2
Predictive coding in the human olfactory system.人类嗅觉系统中的预测编码。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2025 May 8. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2025.04.005.
3
Marketing sonified fragrance: Designing soundscapes for scent.营销可闻声化的香水:为香味设计音景。
Iperception. 2024 Aug 2;15(4):20416695241259714. doi: 10.1177/20416695241259714. eCollection 2024 Jul-Aug.
4
Why human olfaction should not be modeled on theories and tasks of vision.为何人类嗅觉不应基于视觉的理论和任务来建模。
Front Psychol. 2023 Sep 27;14:1244480. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1244480. eCollection 2023.
5
The PROUST hypothesis: the embodiment of olfactory cognition.普鲁斯特假设:嗅觉认知的体现。
Anim Cogn. 2023 Jan;26(1):59-72. doi: 10.1007/s10071-022-01734-1. Epub 2022 Dec 21.
6
Application of artificial intelligence to decode the relationships between smell, olfactory receptors and small molecules.人工智能在解码气味、嗅觉受体和小分子之间关系方面的应用。
Sci Rep. 2022 Nov 5;12(1):18817. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-23176-y.
7
More than meets the AI: The possibilities and limits of machine learning in olfaction.不止于表面所见:机器学习在嗅觉领域的可能性与局限性
Front Neurosci. 2022 Sep 1;16:981294. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2022.981294. eCollection 2022.
8
Maximal Dependence Capturing as a Principle of Sensory Processing.将最大依赖性捕获作为感觉处理的一个原则。
Front Comput Neurosci. 2022 Mar 25;16:857653. doi: 10.3389/fncom.2022.857653. eCollection 2022.
9
The Sensory and Perceptual Scaffolding of Absorption, Inner Speech, and Self in Psychosis.精神病中吸收、内心言语和自我的感觉与知觉支架
Front Psychiatry. 2021 May 10;12:649808. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.649808. eCollection 2021.
10
Recurrent circuitry is required to stabilize piriform cortex odor representations across brain states.反复出现的回路对于跨脑状态稳定梨状皮层的气味表征是必需的。
Elife. 2020 Jul 14;9:e53125. doi: 10.7554/eLife.53125.

本文引用的文献

1
Genetic variation across the human olfactory receptor repertoire alters odor perception.人类嗅觉受体基因序列多样性改变嗅觉感知。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 May 7;116(19):9475-9480. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1804106115. Epub 2019 Apr 30.
2
Functional odor classification through a medicinal chemistry approach.通过药物化学方法进行功能性气味分类。
Sci Adv. 2018 Feb 9;4(2):eaao6086. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aao6086. eCollection 2018 Feb.
3
Odor identity coding by distributed ensembles of neurons in the mouse olfactory cortex.小鼠嗅觉皮层中神经元分布式集群对气味特征的编码
Elife. 2017 May 10;6:e26337. doi: 10.7554/eLife.26337.
4
The distinction between perception and judgment, if there is one, is not clear and intuitive.感知和判断之间的区别,如果有的话,并不明显和直观。
Behav Brain Sci. 2016 Jan;39:e249. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X15002769.
5
Predicting human olfactory perception from chemical features of odor molecules.从气味分子的化学特征预测人类嗅觉感知。
Science. 2017 Feb 24;355(6327):820-826. doi: 10.1126/science.aal2014. Epub 2017 Feb 20.
6
Blue-Black or White-Gold? Early Stage Processing and the Color of 'The Dress'.蓝黑还是白金?早期处理与“那条裙子”的颜色
PLoS One. 2016 Aug 31;11(8):e0161090. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0161090. eCollection 2016.
7
Olfactory perception of chemically diverse molecules.对化学性质多样的分子的嗅觉感知。
BMC Neurosci. 2016 Aug 8;17(1):55. doi: 10.1186/s12868-016-0287-2.
8
Not All Flavor Expertise Is Equal: The Language of Wine and Coffee Experts.并非所有的风味专业知识都是等同的:葡萄酒与咖啡专家的语言。
PLoS One. 2016 Jun 20;11(6):e0155845. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0155845. eCollection 2016.
9
Applying medicinal chemistry strategies to understand odorant discrimination.应用药物化学策略来理解气味辨别。
Nat Commun. 2016 Apr 4;7:11157. doi: 10.1038/ncomms11157.
10
Cognition does not affect perception: Evaluating the evidence for "top-down" effects.认知不会影响感知:评估“自上而下”效应的证据。
Behav Brain Sci. 2016 Jan;39:e229. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X15000965. Epub 2015 Jul 20.