• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

工作记忆训练和高额奖励对青少年大麻使用的影响:一项 SMART 试点试验。

Working memory training and high magnitude incentives for youth cannabis use: A SMART pilot trial.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry.

Department of Biomedical Data Sciences.

出版信息

Psychol Addict Behav. 2020 Feb;34(1):31-39. doi: 10.1037/adb0000480. Epub 2019 Jun 27.

DOI:10.1037/adb0000480
PMID:31246068
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6933103/
Abstract

The purpose of this sequential multiple-assignment randomization treatment pilot study was to examine if (a) adding working memory training to contingency management (CM) for youth with cannabis use disorder (CUD) and (b) switching nonresponding youth to higher magnitude CM incentives boosts outcomes. In Phase 1, youth with CUD ( = 59, age = 16, male = 71%) attending an intensive outpatient program were randomly assigned to 14 weeks of CM only or CM plus working memory training (WMT). In Week 4, a Phase 2 treatment was assigned. Those with negative urine drug tests (responders) continued in their Phase 1 treatment. Those who were drug positive (nonresponders) were randomly assigned to remain in their Phase 1 treatment or to higher magnitude CM. Zero-inflated negative binomial models comparing those assigned to CM versus CM + WMT indicated no differences in the likelihood of having ≥ 1 week of continuous abstinence or longer abstinence duration. Those assigned to WMT showed greater but nonsignificant improvements in working memory ( = 35; β = .69, = .06). Working memory improvements were associated with achieving any abstinence (odds ratio = 3.50, 95% CI [1.01, 12.10], = .05). Phase 2 randomization to higher magnitude CM did not boost outcomes. Overall results suggest that WMT appears promising, but the sample size was small, attrition was high, and replication is important. Alternative strategies should continue to be explored to improve outcomes for adolescent substance use disorders, such as different approaches for nonresponders, tailoring to other baseline or response characteristics, or more robust first-line interventions. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

本序贯多项随机分组治疗试验性研究的目的是检验以下两点

(a) 将工作记忆训练加入到青少年物质使用障碍(SUD)患者的依随性管理(CM)中,以及 (b) 将无应答者切换至更高激励性的 CM 是否能提高疗效。在第 1 阶段,参加强化门诊项目的 SUD 青少年(=59,年龄=16,男性=71%)被随机分配至 14 周的 CM 治疗或 CM 加工作记忆训练(WMT)。在第 4 周,分配了第 2 阶段的治疗。尿液药物检测阴性者(应答者)继续接受第 1 阶段的治疗。尿液药物检测阳性者(无应答者)被随机分配继续接受第 1 阶段的治疗或更高激励性的 CM 治疗。比较 CM 治疗与 CM+WMT 治疗的零膨胀负二项式模型表明,连续戒断至少 1 周或更长时间的可能性无差异。接受 WMT 治疗的患者表现出更好但无统计学意义的工作记忆改善(=35;β=0.69,=0.06)。工作记忆的改善与实现任何戒断相关(比值比=3.50,95%CI[1.01,12.10],=0.05)。分配至更高激励性 CM 的第 2 阶段随机分组并未提高疗效。总体结果表明,WMT 似乎很有前途,但样本量较小,失访率较高,因此需要进一步复制。应该继续探索改善青少年物质使用障碍疗效的替代策略,例如针对无应答者的不同方法、针对其他基线或应答特征的定制化方法,或更有效的一线干预。(APA,2020)

相似文献

1
Working memory training and high magnitude incentives for youth cannabis use: A SMART pilot trial.工作记忆训练和高额奖励对青少年大麻使用的影响:一项 SMART 试点试验。
Psychol Addict Behav. 2020 Feb;34(1):31-39. doi: 10.1037/adb0000480. Epub 2019 Jun 27.
2
Contingency management is associated with positive changes in attitudes and reductions in cannabis use even after discontinuation of incentives among non-treatment seeking youth.应急管理与非治疗寻求青少年在停止奖励后态度的积极变化和大麻使用的减少有关。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2024 Mar 1;256:111096. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2024.111096. Epub 2024 Jan 20.
3
Integrated cognitive behavioral therapy for comorbid cannabis use and anxiety disorders: A pilot randomized controlled trial.共病大麻使用和焦虑障碍的综合认知行为治疗:一项先导随机对照试验。
Behav Res Ther. 2019 Apr;115:38-45. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2018.10.014. Epub 2018 Oct 26.
4
A contingency management intervention to reduce cannabis use and time to relapse in early psychosis: the CIRCLE RCT.一项旨在减少早期精神病患者大麻使用和复发时间的权变管理干预措施:CIRCLE RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2019 Aug;23(45):1-108. doi: 10.3310/hta23450.
5
Abstinence based incentives plus parent training for adolescent alcohol and other substance misuse.基于禁欲的激励措施加上针对青少年酒精及其他物质滥用的家长培训。
Psychol Addict Behav. 2017 Jun;31(4):385-392. doi: 10.1037/adb0000279. Epub 2017 Apr 17.
6
Executive functions and behavioral economic demand for cannabis among young adults: Indirect associations with cannabis consumption and cannabis use disorder.青少年的执行功能和行为经济学对大麻的需求:与大麻消费和大麻使用障碍的间接关联。
Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2024 Jun;32(3):305-315. doi: 10.1037/pha0000678. Epub 2023 Sep 21.
7
Working memory training in children with neuropsychiatric disorders and mild to borderline intellectual functioning, the role of coaching; a double-blind randomized controlled trial.针对患有神经精神疾病且智力功能为轻度至临界水平的儿童进行工作记忆训练,指导的作用;一项双盲随机对照试验。
BMC Psychiatry. 2017 Mar 28;17(1):114. doi: 10.1186/s12888-017-1274-6.
8
Effect of Computer-Based Substance Use Screening and Brief Behavioral Counseling vs Usual Care for Youths in Pediatric Primary Care: A Pilot Randomized Clinical Trial.计算机为基础的物质使用筛查和简短行为咨询对儿科初级保健中青少年的影响:一项先导随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Jun 5;2(6):e196258. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.6258.
9
Individualized assessment and treatment program (IATP) for cannabis use disorder: Randomized controlled trial with and without contingency management.个体化评估和治疗计划(IATP)治疗大麻使用障碍:有和没有条件管理的随机对照试验。
Psychol Addict Behav. 2020 Feb;34(1):40-51. doi: 10.1037/adb0000491. Epub 2019 Jul 18.
10
Contingency management plus acceptance and commitment therapy for initial cocaine abstinence: Results of a sequential multiple assignment randomized trial (SMART).应急管理加接纳与承诺疗法用于初次可卡因戒断:序贯多重分配随机试验(SMART)的结果
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2024 Mar 1;256:111078. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2023.111078. Epub 2024 Jan 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Design characteristics of Sequential Multiple Assignment Randomized Trials (SMARTs) for human health: a scoping review of studies between 2009-2024.人类健康序贯多重分配随机试验(SMARTs)的设计特征:2009年至2024年研究的范围综述
medRxiv. 2025 Jun 8:2025.06.06.25329149. doi: 10.1101/2025.06.06.25329149.
2
Five Challenges in Implementing Cognitive Remediation for Patients with Substance Use Disorders in Clinical Settings.在临床环境中为物质使用障碍患者实施认知矫正的五大挑战。
Neuropsychol Rev. 2024 Sep;34(3):974-984. doi: 10.1007/s11065-023-09623-1. Epub 2023 Oct 16.
3
Psychological Interventions for Cannabis Use among Adolescents and Young Adults: A Systematic Review.青少年和青年人群中使用大麻的心理干预措施:系统评价。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jul 12;20(14):6346. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20146346.
4
SMART Binary: New Sample Size Planning Resources for SMART Studies with Binary Outcome Measurements.SMART 二进制:具有二项结局测量的 SMART 研究的新样本量规划资源。
Multivariate Behav Res. 2024 Jan-Feb;59(1):1-16. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2023.2229079. Epub 2023 Jul 17.
5
Intersection between social inequality and emotion regulation on emerging adult cannabis use.社会不平等与新兴成年人使用大麻时情绪调节之间的交叉关系。
Drug Alcohol Depend Rep. 2022 Jun;3. doi: 10.1016/j.dadr.2022.100050. Epub 2022 Apr 1.
6
MCMTC: A Pragmatic Framework for Selecting an Experimental Design to Inform the Development of Digital Interventions.MCMTC:一种用于选择实验设计以指导数字干预措施开发的实用框架。
Front Digit Health. 2022 Mar 9;4:798025. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2022.798025. eCollection 2022.
7
Examining replicability in addictions research: How to assess and ways forward.审视成瘾研究中的可重复性:评估方法及未来方向。
Psychol Addict Behav. 2022 May;36(3):260-270. doi: 10.1037/adb0000730. Epub 2021 Aug 26.
8
Cognitive Remediation as an Adjunct Treatment for Substance Use Disorders: A Systematic Review.认知矫正作为物质使用障碍的辅助治疗:系统评价。
Neuropsychol Rev. 2022 Mar;32(1):161-191. doi: 10.1007/s11065-021-09506-3. Epub 2021 Apr 19.
9
Workshop on the Development and Evaluation of Digital Therapeutics for Health Behavior Change: Science, Methods, and Projects.健康行为改变数字疗法的开发与评估研讨会:科学、方法与项目
JMIR Ment Health. 2020 Feb 26;7(2):e16751. doi: 10.2196/16751.

本文引用的文献

1
Working Memory Training for Adolescents With Cannabis Use Disorders: A Randomized Controlled Trial.针对患有大麻使用障碍青少年的工作记忆训练:一项随机对照试验。
J Child Adolesc Subst Abuse. 2018;27(4):211-226. doi: 10.1080/1067828X.2018.1451793. Epub 2018 Apr 10.
2
Randomized trial of working memory training as an adjunct to inpatient substance use disorder treatment.随机试验:工作记忆训练作为住院物质使用障碍治疗的辅助手段。
Psychol Addict Behav. 2018 Dec;32(8):861-872. doi: 10.1037/adb0000415. Epub 2018 Nov 26.
3
Evidence Base on Outpatient Behavioral Treatments for Adolescent Substance Use, 2014-2017: Outcomes, Treatment Delivery, and Promising Horizons.2014-2017 年门诊行为治疗青少年物质使用的证据基础:结果、治疗提供情况和充满希望的前景。
J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2018 Jul-Aug;47(4):499-526. doi: 10.1080/15374416.2018.1466307. Epub 2018 Jun 12.
4
The efficacy of a working memory training in substance use patients: A randomized double-blind placebo-controlled clinical trial.工作记忆训练对物质使用障碍患者的疗效:一项随机双盲安慰剂对照临床试验。
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2018 Jun;40(5):473-486. doi: 10.1080/13803395.2017.1372367. Epub 2017 Sep 21.
5
Abstinence based incentives plus parent training for adolescent alcohol and other substance misuse.基于禁欲的激励措施加上针对青少年酒精及其他物质滥用的家长培训。
Psychol Addict Behav. 2017 Jun;31(4):385-392. doi: 10.1037/adb0000279. Epub 2017 Apr 17.
6
Working memory ability and early drug use progression as predictors of adolescent substance use disorders.工作记忆能力和早期药物使用进展作为青少年物质使用障碍的预测指标。
Addiction. 2017 Jul;112(7):1220-1228. doi: 10.1111/add.13792. Epub 2017 Apr 19.
7
Working memory training revisited: A multi-level meta-analysis of n-back training studies.工作记忆训练再探:n-back 训练研究的多层次元分析。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2017 Aug;24(4):1077-1096. doi: 10.3758/s13423-016-1217-0.
8
Advances in Research on Contingency Management for Adolescent Substance Use.青少年物质使用应急管理的研究进展
Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am. 2016 Oct;25(4):645-59. doi: 10.1016/j.chc.2016.05.002.
9
Performance-Based Contingency Management in Cognitive Remediation Training: A Pilot Study.认知康复训练中基于表现的应急管理:一项试点研究。
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2017 Jan;72:80-88. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2016.08.003. Epub 2016 Aug 10.
10
Working Memory Training Does Not Improve Performance on Measures of Intelligence or Other Measures of "Far Transfer": Evidence From a Meta-Analytic Review.工作记忆训练并不能提高智力测试或其他“远迁移”测试的成绩:一项元分析综述的证据
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2016 Jul;11(4):512-34. doi: 10.1177/1745691616635612.