Department of Psychiatry.
Department of Biomedical Data Sciences.
Psychol Addict Behav. 2020 Feb;34(1):31-39. doi: 10.1037/adb0000480. Epub 2019 Jun 27.
The purpose of this sequential multiple-assignment randomization treatment pilot study was to examine if (a) adding working memory training to contingency management (CM) for youth with cannabis use disorder (CUD) and (b) switching nonresponding youth to higher magnitude CM incentives boosts outcomes. In Phase 1, youth with CUD ( = 59, age = 16, male = 71%) attending an intensive outpatient program were randomly assigned to 14 weeks of CM only or CM plus working memory training (WMT). In Week 4, a Phase 2 treatment was assigned. Those with negative urine drug tests (responders) continued in their Phase 1 treatment. Those who were drug positive (nonresponders) were randomly assigned to remain in their Phase 1 treatment or to higher magnitude CM. Zero-inflated negative binomial models comparing those assigned to CM versus CM + WMT indicated no differences in the likelihood of having ≥ 1 week of continuous abstinence or longer abstinence duration. Those assigned to WMT showed greater but nonsignificant improvements in working memory ( = 35; β = .69, = .06). Working memory improvements were associated with achieving any abstinence (odds ratio = 3.50, 95% CI [1.01, 12.10], = .05). Phase 2 randomization to higher magnitude CM did not boost outcomes. Overall results suggest that WMT appears promising, but the sample size was small, attrition was high, and replication is important. Alternative strategies should continue to be explored to improve outcomes for adolescent substance use disorders, such as different approaches for nonresponders, tailoring to other baseline or response characteristics, or more robust first-line interventions. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).
(a) 将工作记忆训练加入到青少年物质使用障碍(SUD)患者的依随性管理(CM)中,以及 (b) 将无应答者切换至更高激励性的 CM 是否能提高疗效。在第 1 阶段,参加强化门诊项目的 SUD 青少年(=59,年龄=16,男性=71%)被随机分配至 14 周的 CM 治疗或 CM 加工作记忆训练(WMT)。在第 4 周,分配了第 2 阶段的治疗。尿液药物检测阴性者(应答者)继续接受第 1 阶段的治疗。尿液药物检测阳性者(无应答者)被随机分配继续接受第 1 阶段的治疗或更高激励性的 CM 治疗。比较 CM 治疗与 CM+WMT 治疗的零膨胀负二项式模型表明,连续戒断至少 1 周或更长时间的可能性无差异。接受 WMT 治疗的患者表现出更好但无统计学意义的工作记忆改善(=35;β=0.69,=0.06)。工作记忆的改善与实现任何戒断相关(比值比=3.50,95%CI[1.01,12.10],=0.05)。分配至更高激励性 CM 的第 2 阶段随机分组并未提高疗效。总体结果表明,WMT 似乎很有前途,但样本量较小,失访率较高,因此需要进一步复制。应该继续探索改善青少年物质使用障碍疗效的替代策略,例如针对无应答者的不同方法、针对其他基线或应答特征的定制化方法,或更有效的一线干预。(APA,2020)