• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

健康对照者脑表观扩散系数分析:单次激发回波平面成像与分段读出回波平面成像的对比研究。

Analysis of Apparent Diffusion Coefficients of the Brain in Healthy Controls: A Comparison Study between Single-Shot Echo-Planar Imaging and Read-out-Segmented Echo-Planar Imaging.

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, Seoul, Korea.

Department of Radiology, Research Institute of Radiological Science, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Korean J Radiol. 2019 Jul;20(7):1138-1145. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2018.0899.

DOI:10.3348/kjr.2018.0899
PMID:31270977
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6609426/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare apparent diffusion coefficients (ADCs) of brain segments by using two diffusion-weighted imaging acquisition modes, single-shot echo-planar imaging (ss-EPI) and read-out-segmented echo-planar imaging (rs-EPI), and to assess their correlation and agreement in healthy controls.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

T2-weighted (T2W) images, rs-EPI, and ss-EPI of 30 healthy subjects were acquired using a 3T magnetic resonance scanner. The T2W images were co-registered to the rs-EPI and ss-EPI, which were then segmented into the gray matter (GM), white matter (WM), and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) to generate masking templates. ADC maps of rs-EPI and ss-EPI were also segmented into the GM, WM, and CSF by using the generated templates. ADCs of rs-EPI and ss-EPI were compared using Student's tests and correlated using Pearson's correlation coefficients. Bland-Altman plots were used to assess the agreement between acquisitions.

RESULTS

ADCs of rs-EPI and ss-EPI were significantly different in the GM ( < 0.001) and WM ( < 0.001). ADCs showed high agreement and correlation in the whole brain and CSF ( > 0.988; < 0.001). ADC of the WM showed the least correlation (r = 0.894; < 0.001), and ADCs of the WM and GM showed poor agreement. Pearson's correlation equations for each brain segment were y = 1.1x - 59.4 (GM), y = 1.45x - 255 (WM), and y = 0.98x - 63.5 (CSF), where x and y indicated ADCs of rs-EPI and ss-EPI, respectively.

CONCLUSION

While ADCs of rs-EPI and ss-EPI showed high correlation and agreement in the whole brain and CSF, ADCs of the WM and GM showed significant differences and large variability, reflecting brain parenchymal inhomogeneity due to different regional microenvironments. ADCs of different acquisition methods should be interpreted carefully, especially in intra-individual comparisons.

摘要

目的

比较单次激发回波平面成像(ss-EPI)和读出分段回波平面成像(rs-EPI)两种扩散加权成像采集模式下脑段的表观扩散系数(ADC),并评估在健康对照者中的相关性和一致性。

材料与方法

使用 3.0T 磁共振扫描仪对 30 例健康受试者的 T2 加权(T2W)图像、rs-EPI 和 ss-EPI 进行采集。将 T2W 图像与 rs-EPI 和 ss-EPI 配准,然后将其分割为灰质(GM)、白质(WM)和脑脊液(CSF),以生成掩模模板。使用生成的模板将 rs-EPI 和 ss-EPI 的 ADC 图也分割为 GM、WM 和 CSF。使用 Student's t 检验比较 rs-EPI 和 ss-EPI 的 ADC,并使用 Pearson 相关系数进行相关性分析。使用 Bland-Altman 图评估采集之间的一致性。

结果

GM(<0.001)和 WM(<0.001)中 rs-EPI 和 ss-EPI 的 ADC 差异有统计学意义。全脑和 CSF 中 ADC 具有高度一致性和相关性(>0.988;<0.001)。WM 的 ADC 相关性最低(r=0.894;<0.001),WM 和 GM 的 ADC 一致性较差。每个脑段的 Pearson 相关方程分别为 y=1.1x-59.4(GM)、y=1.45x-255(WM)和 y=0.98x-63.5(CSF),其中 x 和 y 分别表示 rs-EPI 和 ss-EPI 的 ADC。

结论

尽管 rs-EPI 和 ss-EPI 的 ADC 在全脑和 CSF 中具有高度相关性和一致性,但 WM 和 GM 的 ADC 差异显著且变异性较大,反映了由于不同的局部微环境导致的脑实质不均匀性。应仔细解释不同采集方法的 ADC 值,尤其是在个体内比较时。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58a0/6609426/cbb93b281d19/kjr-20-1138-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58a0/6609426/79df175bb65f/kjr-20-1138-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58a0/6609426/e51dc149bde8/kjr-20-1138-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58a0/6609426/189195963138/kjr-20-1138-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58a0/6609426/cbb93b281d19/kjr-20-1138-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58a0/6609426/79df175bb65f/kjr-20-1138-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58a0/6609426/e51dc149bde8/kjr-20-1138-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58a0/6609426/189195963138/kjr-20-1138-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58a0/6609426/cbb93b281d19/kjr-20-1138-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Analysis of Apparent Diffusion Coefficients of the Brain in Healthy Controls: A Comparison Study between Single-Shot Echo-Planar Imaging and Read-out-Segmented Echo-Planar Imaging.健康对照者脑表观扩散系数分析:单次激发回波平面成像与分段读出回波平面成像的对比研究。
Korean J Radiol. 2019 Jul;20(7):1138-1145. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2018.0899.
2
Readout-segmented echo-planar imaging in diffusion-weighted imaging of the kidney: comparison with single-shot echo-planar imaging in image quality.分段读出回波平面成像在肾脏扩散加权成像中的应用:与单次激发回波平面成像在图像质量方面的比较。
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2016 Jan;41(1):100-8. doi: 10.1007/s00261-015-0615-5.
3
Diffusion-Weighted MRI to Assess Sacroiliitis: Improved Image Quality and Diagnostic Performance of Readout-Segmented Echo-Planar Imaging (EPI) Over Conventional Single-Shot EPI.扩散加权 MRI 评估中轴型脊柱关节炎:分段读出回波平面成像(EPI)优于传统单次激发 EPI,可提高图像质量和诊断性能。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2021 Aug;217(2):450-459. doi: 10.2214/AJR.20.23953. Epub 2021 Jun 9.
4
Diagnostic Performance of Diffusion Tensor Imaging with Readout-segmented Echo-planar Imaging for Invasive Breast Cancer: Correlation of ADC and FA with Pathological Prognostic Markers.读出分段回波平面成像的扩散张量成像对浸润性乳腺癌的诊断性能:表观扩散系数(ADC)和各向异性分数(FA)与病理预后标志物的相关性
Magn Reson Med Sci. 2017 Jul 10;16(3):245-252. doi: 10.2463/mrms.mp.2016-0037. Epub 2016 Nov 16.
5
Readout-segmented echo-planar imaging improves the image quality of diffusion-weighted MR imaging in rectal cancer: Comparison with single-shot echo-planar diffusion-weighted sequences.读出分段回波平面成像改善直肠癌扩散加权磁共振成像的图像质量:与单次激发回波平面扩散加权序列的比较。
Eur J Radiol. 2016 Oct;85(10):1818-1823. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2016.08.008. Epub 2016 Aug 10.
6
Readout-segmented echo-planar diffusion-weighted imaging in the assessment of orbital tumors: comparison with conventional single-shot echo-planar imaging in image quality and diagnostic performance.读出分段回波平面扩散加权成像在眼眶肿瘤评估中的应用:与传统单次激发回波平面成像在图像质量和诊断性能方面的比较。
Acta Radiol. 2017 Dec;58(12):1457-1467. doi: 10.1177/0284185117695667. Epub 2017 Mar 22.
7
Readout-Segmented Echo-Planar Diffusion-Weighted MR Imaging Improves the Differentiation of Breast Cancer Receptor Statuses Compared With Conventional Diffusion-Weighted Imaging.读出分段回波平面扩散加权磁共振成像与传统扩散加权成像相比,可提高乳腺癌受体状态的鉴别能力。
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2022 Sep;56(3):691-699. doi: 10.1002/jmri.28065. Epub 2022 Jan 17.
8
Bilateral diffusion-weighted MR imaging of breast tumors with submillimeter resolution using readout-segmented echo-planar imaging at 7 T.使用 7T 读出分段回波平面成像技术对乳腺肿瘤进行亚毫米分辨率的双侧扩散加权磁共振成像。
Radiology. 2015 Jan;274(1):74-84. doi: 10.1148/radiol.14132340. Epub 2014 Oct 23.
9
Readout-segmented echo-planar imaging for diffusion-weighted imaging in the pelvis at 3T-A feasibility study.3T下盆腔扩散加权成像的读出分段回波平面成像——一项可行性研究
Acad Radiol. 2014 Apr;21(4):531-7. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2014.01.005.
10
Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in bladder cancer: comparison of readout-segmented and single-shot EPI techniques.膀胱癌的弥散加权磁共振成像:分段读出和单次激发 EPI 技术的比较。
Cancer Imaging. 2019 Aug 27;19(1):59. doi: 10.1186/s40644-019-0245-1.

引用本文的文献

1
Characterization of Portable Ultra-Low Field MRI Scanners for Multi-Center Structural Neuroimaging.用于多中心结构神经成像的便携式超低场MRI扫描仪的特性分析
Hum Brain Mapp. 2025 Jun 1;46(8):e70217. doi: 10.1002/hbm.70217.

本文引用的文献

1
Readout-segmented echo-planar imaging in the evaluation of sinonasal lesions: A comprehensive comparison of image quality in single-shot echo-planar imaging.读出分段回波平面成像在鼻窦病变评估中的应用:单次激发回波平面成像图像质量的全面比较
Magn Reson Imaging. 2016 Feb;34(2):166-72. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2015.10.010. Epub 2015 Nov 2.
2
Endometrial cancer: correlation of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) with tumor cellularity and tumor grade.子宫内膜癌:表观扩散系数(ADC)与肿瘤细胞密度及肿瘤分级的相关性
Acta Radiol. 2016 Aug;57(8):1021-8. doi: 10.1177/0284185115612249. Epub 2015 Oct 19.
3
Feasibility Study of 3-T DWI of the Prostate: Readout-Segmented Versus Single-Shot Echo-Planar Imaging.
3T前列腺扩散加权成像的可行性研究:读出分段与单次激发回波平面成像
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015 Jul;205(1):70-6. doi: 10.2214/AJR.14.13489.
4
Improvement of renal diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging with readout-segmented echo-planar imaging at 3T.3T下采用读出分段回波平面成像技术改善肾脏扩散加权磁共振成像
Magn Reson Imaging. 2015 Jul;33(6):701-8. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2015.02.023. Epub 2015 Feb 27.
5
Usefulness of free-breathing readout-segmented echo-planar imaging (RESOLVE) for detection of malignant liver tumors: comparison with single-shot echo-planar imaging (SS-EPI).自由呼吸读出分段回波平面成像(RESOLVE)在检测肝脏恶性肿瘤中的应用:与单次激发回波平面成像(SS-EPI)的比较。
Eur J Radiol. 2014 Oct;83(10):1728-33. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2014.06.013. Epub 2014 Jun 30.
6
Assessing white matter microstructure of the newborn with multi-shell diffusion MRI and biophysical compartment models.应用多壳层扩散 MRI 和生物物理房室模型评估新生儿的脑白质微观结构。
Neuroimage. 2014 Aug 1;96:288-99. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.03.057. Epub 2014 Mar 28.
7
Apparent diffusion coefficient threshold for delineation of ischemic core.用于界定缺血核心区的表观扩散系数阈值
Int J Stroke. 2015 Apr;10(3):348-53. doi: 10.1111/ijs.12068. Epub 2013 Jun 27.
8
Brain tumors: a multimodality approach with diffusion-weighted imaging, diffusion tensor imaging, magnetic resonance spectroscopy, dynamic susceptibility contrast and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.脑肿瘤:采用扩散加权成像、扩散张量成像、磁共振波谱、动态磁敏感对比和动态对比增强磁共振成像的多模态方法
Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 2013 May;21(2):199-239. doi: 10.1016/j.mric.2013.02.003.
9
Assessment of white matter integrity of autistic preschool children with diffusion weighted MR imaging.利用扩散加权磁共振成像评估自闭症学龄前儿童的白质完整性
Brain Dev. 2014 Jan;36(1):28-34. doi: 10.1016/j.braindev.2013.01.003. Epub 2013 Feb 8.
10
A trial of imaging selection and endovascular treatment for ischemic stroke.血管内治疗与影像学选择对缺血性脑卒中的治疗试验
N Engl J Med. 2013 Mar 7;368(10):914-23. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1212793. Epub 2013 Feb 8.