Department of Radiology, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Department of Radiology, Research Institute of Radiological Science, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Korean J Radiol. 2019 Jul;20(7):1138-1145. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2018.0899.
To compare apparent diffusion coefficients (ADCs) of brain segments by using two diffusion-weighted imaging acquisition modes, single-shot echo-planar imaging (ss-EPI) and read-out-segmented echo-planar imaging (rs-EPI), and to assess their correlation and agreement in healthy controls.
T2-weighted (T2W) images, rs-EPI, and ss-EPI of 30 healthy subjects were acquired using a 3T magnetic resonance scanner. The T2W images were co-registered to the rs-EPI and ss-EPI, which were then segmented into the gray matter (GM), white matter (WM), and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) to generate masking templates. ADC maps of rs-EPI and ss-EPI were also segmented into the GM, WM, and CSF by using the generated templates. ADCs of rs-EPI and ss-EPI were compared using Student's tests and correlated using Pearson's correlation coefficients. Bland-Altman plots were used to assess the agreement between acquisitions.
ADCs of rs-EPI and ss-EPI were significantly different in the GM ( < 0.001) and WM ( < 0.001). ADCs showed high agreement and correlation in the whole brain and CSF ( > 0.988; < 0.001). ADC of the WM showed the least correlation (r = 0.894; < 0.001), and ADCs of the WM and GM showed poor agreement. Pearson's correlation equations for each brain segment were y = 1.1x - 59.4 (GM), y = 1.45x - 255 (WM), and y = 0.98x - 63.5 (CSF), where x and y indicated ADCs of rs-EPI and ss-EPI, respectively.
While ADCs of rs-EPI and ss-EPI showed high correlation and agreement in the whole brain and CSF, ADCs of the WM and GM showed significant differences and large variability, reflecting brain parenchymal inhomogeneity due to different regional microenvironments. ADCs of different acquisition methods should be interpreted carefully, especially in intra-individual comparisons.
比较单次激发回波平面成像(ss-EPI)和读出分段回波平面成像(rs-EPI)两种扩散加权成像采集模式下脑段的表观扩散系数(ADC),并评估在健康对照者中的相关性和一致性。
使用 3.0T 磁共振扫描仪对 30 例健康受试者的 T2 加权(T2W)图像、rs-EPI 和 ss-EPI 进行采集。将 T2W 图像与 rs-EPI 和 ss-EPI 配准,然后将其分割为灰质(GM)、白质(WM)和脑脊液(CSF),以生成掩模模板。使用生成的模板将 rs-EPI 和 ss-EPI 的 ADC 图也分割为 GM、WM 和 CSF。使用 Student's t 检验比较 rs-EPI 和 ss-EPI 的 ADC,并使用 Pearson 相关系数进行相关性分析。使用 Bland-Altman 图评估采集之间的一致性。
GM(<0.001)和 WM(<0.001)中 rs-EPI 和 ss-EPI 的 ADC 差异有统计学意义。全脑和 CSF 中 ADC 具有高度一致性和相关性(>0.988;<0.001)。WM 的 ADC 相关性最低(r=0.894;<0.001),WM 和 GM 的 ADC 一致性较差。每个脑段的 Pearson 相关方程分别为 y=1.1x-59.4(GM)、y=1.45x-255(WM)和 y=0.98x-63.5(CSF),其中 x 和 y 分别表示 rs-EPI 和 ss-EPI 的 ADC。
尽管 rs-EPI 和 ss-EPI 的 ADC 在全脑和 CSF 中具有高度相关性和一致性,但 WM 和 GM 的 ADC 差异显著且变异性较大,反映了由于不同的局部微环境导致的脑实质不均匀性。应仔细解释不同采集方法的 ADC 值,尤其是在个体内比较时。