Imoisili Omoye E, Levinsohn Erik, Pan Cassie, Howell Benjamin A, Streiter Shoshana, Rosenbaum Julie R
Health Lit Res Pract. 2017 Nov 9;1(4):e203-e207. doi: 10.3928/24748307-20170918-01. eCollection 2017 Oct.
Limited health literacy is associated with worse health outcomes. It is standard practice in many primary care clinics to provide patients with written patient education materials (PEM), which often come directly from an electronic health record (EHR). We compared the health literacy of patients in a primary care residency clinic with EHR PEM readability by grade level. We assessed health literacy using the Rapid Estimate of Adult Literacy in Medicine-Short Form (REALM-SF), and determined grade level readability for the PEM distributed for the five most common clinical diagnoses using the Simple Measure of Gobbledygook (SMOG) and Flesch-Kincaid metrics. Among 175 participants, health literacy was ≥9th grade for 76 patients (43.4%), 7th to 8th grade for 66 patients (37.7%), and ≤6th grade for 30 patients (17.1%). Average standard PEM readability by SMOG was grade 9.2 and easy-to-read PEM readability was grade 6.8. These findings suggest a discrepancy between the health literacy of most patients who were surveyed and standard PEM readability. Despite national guidelines encouraging clinicians to provide PEM at an appropriate reading level, our results indicate that PEM from EHR may not be readable for many patients. .
健康素养有限与较差的健康结果相关。在许多初级保健诊所,为患者提供书面患者教育材料(PEM)是标准做法,这些材料通常直接来自电子健康记录(EHR)。我们通过年级水平比较了初级保健住院诊所患者的健康素养与EHR PEM的可读性。我们使用医学成人识字快速评估简表(REALM-SF)评估健康素养,并使用难词简易测量法(SMOG)和弗莱什-金凯德指标确定针对五种最常见临床诊断分发的PEM的年级水平可读性。在175名参与者中,76名患者(43.4%)的健康素养≥9年级,66名患者(37.7%)为7至8年级,30名患者(17.1%)≤6年级。SMOG评估的标准PEM平均可读性为9.2年级,易读PEM的可读性为6.8年级。这些发现表明,大多数接受调查的患者的健康素养与标准PEM可读性之间存在差异。尽管国家指南鼓励临床医生以适当的阅读水平提供PEM,但我们的结果表明,来自EHR的PEM对许多患者来说可能不可读。