• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

ℓ 正则化的扩展提高了动态模型中细胞类型特异性参数的检测特异性。

Extensions of ℓ regularization increase detection specificity for cell-type specific parameters in dynamic models.

机构信息

Institute of Physics, University of Freiburg, Hermann-Herder-Str. 3, Freiburg, 79104, Germany.

Signalling Research Centres BIOSS and CIBSS, Schänzlestr. 18, Freiburg, 79104, Germany.

出版信息

BMC Bioinformatics. 2019 Jul 16;20(1):395. doi: 10.1186/s12859-019-2976-1.

DOI:10.1186/s12859-019-2976-1
PMID:31311516
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6636101/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Ordinary differential equation systems are frequently utilized to model biological systems and to infer knowledge about underlying properties. For instance, the development of drugs requires the knowledge to which extent malign cells differ from healthy ones to provide a specific treatment with least side effects. As these cell-type specific properties may stem from any part of biochemical cell processes, systematic quantitative approaches are necessary to identify the relevant potential drug targets. An ℓ regularization for the maximum likelihood parameter estimation proved to be successful, but falsely predicted cell-type dependent behaviour had to be corrected manually by using a Profile Likelihood approach.

RESULTS

The choice of extended ℓ penalty functions significantly decreased the number of falsely detected cell-type specific parameters. Thus, the total accuracy of the prediction could be increased. This was tested on a realistic dynamical benchmark model used for the DREAM6 challenge. Among Elastic Net, Adaptive Lasso and a non-convex ℓ penalty, the latter one showed the best predictions whilst also requiring least computation time. All extended methods include a hyper-parameter in the regularization function. For an Erythropoietin (EPO) induced signalling pathway, the extended methods ℓ and Adaptive Lasso revealed an unpublished alternative parsimonious model when varying the respective hyper-parameters.

CONCLUSIONS

Using ℓ or Adaptive Lasso with an a-priori choice for the hyper-parameter can lead to a more specific and accurate result than ℓ. Scanning different hyper-parameters can yield additional pieces of information about the system.

摘要

背景

常微分方程组常被用于对生物系统建模,并推导出有关基础特性的知识。例如,药物的开发需要了解恶性细胞与健康细胞的差异程度,以便提供副作用最小的特定治疗方法。由于这些细胞类型特异性的特性可能源于生化细胞过程的任何部分,因此需要系统的定量方法来识别相关的潜在药物靶点。最大似然参数估计的ℓ正则化已被证明是成功的,但需要使用似然比方法手动纠正假阳性的细胞类型依赖性行为。

结果

扩展ℓ惩罚函数的选择显著减少了错误检测到的细胞类型特异性参数的数量。因此,可以提高预测的整体准确性。这在用于 DREAM6 挑战的现实动态基准模型上进行了测试。在弹性网络、自适应套索和非凸ℓ惩罚之间,后者显示出最佳的预测效果,同时也需要最少的计算时间。所有扩展方法都在正则化函数中包含一个超参数。对于红细胞生成素(EPO)诱导的信号通路,在调整各自的超参数时,扩展方法ℓ和自适应套索揭示了一个未公开的替代简约模型。

结论

使用具有超参数先验选择的ℓ或自适应套索可以比ℓ得到更具体和准确的结果。扫描不同的超参数可以为系统提供额外的信息。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5371/6636101/934103dfd0bb/12859_2019_2976_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5371/6636101/280c0ededcbd/12859_2019_2976_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5371/6636101/add4458be195/12859_2019_2976_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5371/6636101/2c20081ba6bc/12859_2019_2976_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5371/6636101/48a093bc4df0/12859_2019_2976_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5371/6636101/934103dfd0bb/12859_2019_2976_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5371/6636101/280c0ededcbd/12859_2019_2976_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5371/6636101/add4458be195/12859_2019_2976_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5371/6636101/2c20081ba6bc/12859_2019_2976_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5371/6636101/48a093bc4df0/12859_2019_2976_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5371/6636101/934103dfd0bb/12859_2019_2976_Fig5_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Extensions of ℓ regularization increase detection specificity for cell-type specific parameters in dynamic models.ℓ 正则化的扩展提高了动态模型中细胞类型特异性参数的检测特异性。
BMC Bioinformatics. 2019 Jul 16;20(1):395. doi: 10.1186/s12859-019-2976-1.
2
A systems biology approach to analyse amplification in the JAK2-STAT5 signalling pathway.一种用于分析JAK2-STAT5信号通路中扩增的系统生物学方法。
BMC Syst Biol. 2008 Apr 25;2:38. doi: 10.1186/1752-0509-2-38.
3
L1 regularization facilitates detection of cell type-specific parameters in dynamical systems.L1正则化有助于检测动态系统中细胞类型特异性参数。
Bioinformatics. 2016 Sep 1;32(17):i718-i726. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btw461.
4
Sparse logistic regression with a L1/2 penalty for gene selection in cancer classification.基于 L1/2 罚项的稀疏逻辑回归在癌症分类中的基因选择。
BMC Bioinformatics. 2013 Jun 19;14:198. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-14-198.
5
A system biology approach to understand functional activity of cell communication systems.一种用于理解细胞通讯系统功能活性的系统生物学方法。
Methods Cell Biol. 2008;90:399-415. doi: 10.1016/S0091-679X(08)00817-0.
6
High-dimensional Bayesian parameter estimation: case study for a model of JAK2/STAT5 signaling.高维贝叶斯参数估计:JAK2/STAT5 信号模型的案例研究。
Math Biosci. 2013 Dec;246(2):293-304. doi: 10.1016/j.mbs.2013.04.002. Epub 2013 Apr 16.
7
Predictive mathematical models of cancer signalling pathways.癌症信号通路的预测数学模型。
J Intern Med. 2012 Feb;271(2):155-65. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2796.2011.02492.x.
8
Erythropoietin induces sustained phosphorylation of STAT5 in primitive but not definitive erythrocytes generated from mouse embryonic stem cells.促红细胞生成素可诱导小鼠胚胎干细胞产生的原始红细胞而非定型红细胞中信号转导及转录激活因子5(STAT5)的持续磷酸化。
Exp Hematol. 2006 Oct;34(10):1323-32. doi: 10.1016/j.exphem.2006.06.004.
9
Identification of Cell Type-Specific Differences in Erythropoietin Receptor Signaling in Primary Erythroid and Lung Cancer Cells.原发性红细胞和肺癌细胞中促红细胞生成素受体信号传导的细胞类型特异性差异鉴定
PLoS Comput Biol. 2016 Aug 5;12(8):e1005049. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005049. eCollection 2016 Aug.
10
Essential role for Stat5 in the neurotrophic but not in the neuroprotective effect of erythropoietin.信号转导及转录激活蛋白5(Stat5)在促红细胞生成素的神经营养作用而非神经保护作用中起关键作用。
Cell Death Differ. 2008 Apr;15(4):783-92. doi: 10.1038/cdd.2008.1. Epub 2008 Feb 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Uncovering specific mechanisms across cell types in dynamical models.揭示动态模型中不同细胞类型的特定机制。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2023 Sep 13;19(9):e1010867. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010867. eCollection 2023 Sep.
2
Using Kinetic Modelling to Infer Adaptations in Carbohydrate Storage Metabolism to Dynamic Substrate Conditions.利用动力学模型推断碳水化合物储存代谢对动态底物条件的适应性。
Metabolites. 2023 Jan 5;13(1):88. doi: 10.3390/metabo13010088.
3
Disentangling ERBB Signaling in Breast Cancer Subtypes-A Model-Based Analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
Benchmarking optimization methods for parameter estimation in large kinetic models.基准测试大型动力学模型参数估计中的优化方法。
Bioinformatics. 2019 Mar 1;35(5):830-838. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty736.
2
Benchmark problems for dynamic modeling of intracellular processes.细胞内过程动态建模的基准问题。
Bioinformatics. 2019 Sep 1;35(17):3073-3082. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btz020.
3
Predicting ligand-dependent tumors from multi-dimensional signaling features.从多维信号特征预测配体依赖性肿瘤。
解析乳腺癌亚型中的ERBB信号传导——基于模型的分析
Cancers (Basel). 2022 May 12;14(10):2379. doi: 10.3390/cancers14102379.
4
Kinetic Modeling of Central Carbon Metabolism: Achievements, Limitations, and Opportunities.中枢碳代谢的动力学建模:成就、局限与机遇
Metabolites. 2022 Jan 13;12(1):74. doi: 10.3390/metabo12010074.
5
Personalized computational model quantifies heterogeneity in postprandial responses to oral glucose challenge.个性化计算模型量化口服葡萄糖耐量试验餐后反应的异质性。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2021 Mar 31;17(3):e1008852. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008852. eCollection 2021 Mar.
6
Metabolic Modeling Combined With Machine Learning Integrates Longitudinal Data and Identifies the Origin of LXR-Induced Hepatic Steatosis.代谢建模与机器学习相结合整合纵向数据并确定肝脏X受体诱导的肝脂肪变性的起源。
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2021 Feb 16;8:536957. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2020.536957. eCollection 2020.
NPJ Syst Biol Appl. 2017 Sep 20;3:27. doi: 10.1038/s41540-017-0030-3. eCollection 2017.
4
Driving the Model to Its Limit: Profile Likelihood Based Model Reduction.将模型推向极限:基于轮廓似然的模型简化
PLoS One. 2016 Sep 2;11(9):e0162366. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0162366. eCollection 2016.
5
L1 regularization facilitates detection of cell type-specific parameters in dynamical systems.L1正则化有助于检测动态系统中细胞类型特异性参数。
Bioinformatics. 2016 Sep 1;32(17):i718-i726. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btw461.
6
Identification of Cell Type-Specific Differences in Erythropoietin Receptor Signaling in Primary Erythroid and Lung Cancer Cells.原发性红细胞和肺癌细胞中促红细胞生成素受体信号传导的细胞类型特异性差异鉴定
PLoS Comput Biol. 2016 Aug 5;12(8):e1005049. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005049. eCollection 2016 Aug.
7
Data2Dynamics: a modeling environment tailored to parameter estimation in dynamical systems.Data2Dynamics:一个专为动态系统参数估计定制的建模环境。
Bioinformatics. 2015 Nov 1;31(21):3558-60. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv405. Epub 2015 Jul 3.
8
Lessons learned from quantitative dynamical modeling in systems biology.从系统生物学的定量动态建模中吸取的教训。
PLoS One. 2013 Sep 30;8(9):e74335. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0074335. eCollection 2013.
9
Experimental design for parameter estimation of gene regulatory networks.基因调控网络参数估计的实验设计。
PLoS One. 2012;7(7):e40052. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0040052. Epub 2012 Jul 16.
10
Division of labor by dual feedback regulators controls JAK2/STAT5 signaling over broad ligand range.双反馈调节剂的分工控制 JAK2/STAT5 信号在广泛的配体范围内。
Mol Syst Biol. 2011 Jul 19;7:516. doi: 10.1038/msb.2011.50.