Giles J A, Hudson E, Crow J, Williams D, Walker P
Royal Free Hospital, London.
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1988 Apr 16;296(6629):1099-102. doi: 10.1136/bmj.296.6629.1099.
Two hundred asymptomatic women in a general practice were screened both cytologically and colposcopically for evidence of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. The prevalence detected by cytology alone was 5%, but the prevalence detected by cytology and colposcopy together was 11%. None of the larger lesions of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (affecting more than two quadrants of the cervix) was associated with negative cytology. The false negative cytology rate for smaller lesions was 58%. The clinical importance of the smaller lesions that were not accurately detected by cytology screening is unknown. As these lesions affected 6% of the screened population further studies of their clinical course are urgently required. Local destructive treatment in such cases may represent considerable overtreatment. If these lesions prove to be clinically important, however, the results of this study predict an increasing epidemic of preinvasive and invasive disease of the cervix.
在一项全科医疗研究中,对200名无症状女性进行了细胞学和阴道镜检查,以筛查宫颈上皮内瘤变的迹象。仅通过细胞学检查检测到的患病率为5%,但通过细胞学和阴道镜检查共同检测到的患病率为11%。宫颈上皮内瘤变的较大病变(累及宫颈超过两个象限)均与细胞学阴性无关。较小病变的细胞学假阴性率为58%。细胞学筛查未准确检测到的较小病变的临床重要性尚不清楚。由于这些病变影响了6%的筛查人群,因此迫切需要对其临床病程进行进一步研究。在此类病例中进行局部破坏性治疗可能意味着过度治疗。然而,如果这些病变被证明具有临床重要性,那么本研究结果预示着宫颈浸润前和浸润性疾病的流行将加剧。