Department of Radiology, Hacettepe University, School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.
Department of Radiation Oncology, Hacettepe University, School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.
Br J Radiol. 2021 Feb 1;94(1118):20200825. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20200825. Epub 2020 Dec 22.
Diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) has become important for orbital imaging. However, the echoplanar imaging (EPI) DWI has inherent obstacles due to susceptibility to magnetic field inhomogeneities. We conducted a comparative study assessing the image quality of orbits in a patient cohort with uveal melanoma (UM). We hypothesized that single shot turbo spin echo (ssTSE) DWI would have better image quality in terms of less distortion and artifacts and yield better tissue evaluation compared to ssEPI-DWI.
ssEPI-DWI and ssTSE-DWI of orbits were obtained from 50 patients with uveal melanoma who were prospectively enrolled in the study. Distortion ratio (DR), signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), diffusion signal properties, and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values were collected and compared between ssEPI-DWI and ssTSE-DWI. Two reviewers evaluated and compared the geometric distortion, susceptibility and ghosting artifacts, resolution, demarcation of ocular mass, and overall quality.
A higher DR was found in ssEPI-DWI compared to ssTSE-DWI ( < 0.001). SNR and CNR were lower for the temporal lobe cortex ( ≤ 0.004), but higher for melanoma in ssEPI-DWI than ssTSE-DWI ( ≤ 0.037). Geometric distortion and artifacts were more common in ssEPI-DWI ( < 0.001). Resolution ( ≤ 0.013) and overall quality ( < 0.001) were better in ssTSE-DWI. Ocular masses were demarcated better on ssEPI-DWI ( ≤ 0.002). Significant negative correlations between T1 and T2 signal intensities ( = -0.369, ≤ 0.008) and positive correlations between T2 and both DWI signal intensities ( = 0.686 and < 0.001 for ssEPI-DWI, = 0.747 and < 0.001 for ssTSE-DWI) were revealed.
With less geometric distortion and susceptibility artifacts, better resolution, and overall quality, ssTSE-DWI can serve as an alternative to ssEPI-DWI for orbital DWI.
ssTSE-DWI can be a better alternative of diffusion imaging of orbits with less susceptibility artifact and geometric distortion compared to ssEPI-DWI.
扩散加权成像(DWI)已成为眼眶成像的重要手段。然而,由于易受磁场不均匀性的影响,平面回波成像(EPI)DWI 存在固有障碍。我们进行了一项比较研究,评估了葡萄膜黑色素瘤(UM)患者队列中眼眶的图像质量。我们假设单次激发涡轮自旋回波(ssTSE)DWI 在失真和伪影较少的情况下,具有比 ssEPI-DWI 更好的组织评估能力。
前瞻性纳入 50 例 UM 患者,对其行眼眶 ssEPI-DWI 和 ssTSE-DWI 检查。收集并比较 ssEPI-DWI 和 ssTSE-DWI 的失真比(DR)、信噪比(SNR)、对比噪声比(CNR)、扩散信号特性和表观扩散系数(ADC)值。两位观察者评估并比较了几何失真、磁化率伪影和鬼影、分辨率、眼部肿块边界和整体质量。
ssEPI-DWI 的 DR 高于 ssTSE-DWI(<0.001)。颞叶皮质的 SNR 和 CNR 较低(≤0.004),但 ssEPI-DWI 中的黑色素瘤 SNR 和 CNR 较高(≤0.037)。ssEPI-DWI 中的几何失真和伪影更为常见(<0.001)。ssTSE-DWI 的分辨率(≤0.013)和整体质量(<0.001)更好。ssEPI-DWI 对眼部肿块的边界显示更好(≤0.002)。T1 和 T2 信号强度之间存在显著的负相关关系(r=-0.369,P=0.008),T2 与两种 DWI 信号强度之间存在显著的正相关关系(ssEPI-DWI 为 r=0.686,P<0.001;ssTSE-DWI 为 r=0.747,P<0.001)。
与 ssEPI-DWI 相比,ssTSE-DWI 具有较少的几何失真和磁化率伪影、更好的分辨率和整体质量,可作为眼眶 DWI 的替代方法。
与 ssEPI-DWI 相比,ssTSE-DWI 具有较少的磁化率伪影和几何失真,可为眼眶扩散成像提供更好的替代方法。