The Research Unit for Movement, Health and Environment, The Åstrand Laboratory & Laboratory for Applied Sport Science, The Swedish School of Sport and Health Sciences, GIH, Stockholm, Sweden.
PLoS One. 2019 Jul 24;14(7):e0219741. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0219741. eCollection 2019.
Monitoring aerobic exercise intensities of free-living physical activities is valuable for purposes such as education and research. The heart rate (HR) method, based on the linear relation between HR and oxygen uptake (VO2), is potentially valuable for this purpose. Three prerequisites are that the method is reproducible, and valid for the specific form of physical activity executed as well as under field conditions. The aim of this study is to evaluate reproducibility of the heart rate method in the laboratory. VO2 and HR measurements were made on two different occasions during three submaximal (model 1) plus a maximal exercise intensity (model 2) on a cycle ergometer in the laboratory. 19 habitual commuter cyclists (9 males and 10 females), aged 44 ± 3 years, were measured. The reproducibility of the estimated VO2, based on three levels of HR from commuting cycling and the regression equations from test and retest were analyzed. Differences between the two models were also studied. For both models, there were no significant differences between test and retest in the constituents of the regression equations (y-intercept, slope and r-value). Neither were there any systematic differences in estimated absolute levels of VO2 between test and retest. The relative differences between test and retest, based on estimations from three different levels of HR, were 0.99 ± 11.0 (n.s.), 2.67 ± 6.48 (n.s.) and 3.57 ± 6.24% (p<0.05) for model 1, and 1.09 ± 10.6, 1.75 ± 6.43 and 2.12 ± 5.92% (all n.s.) for model 2. However, some large individual differences were seen in both models. There were no significant differences between the two models in the slopes, intercepts or r-values of the regression equations or in the estimated levels of VO2. The heart rate method shows good reproducibility on the group level in estimating oxygen consumption from HR-VO2 relations in the laboratory, and based on three levels of HR which are representative for cycle commuting. However, on the individual level, some large variations were seen.
监测自由活动中有氧运动的强度对于教育和研究等目的非常有价值。心率(HR)方法基于 HR 与摄氧量(VO2)之间的线性关系,对于该目的具有潜在的价值。该方法具有可重复性,并且对所执行的特定形式的体力活动以及现场条件有效,这是三个前提条件。本研究的目的是评估实验室中心率方法的可重复性。在实验室的自行车测功仪上,对 3 次亚最大运动强度(模型 1)和 1 次最大运动强度(模型 2)期间的两次不同场合进行了 VO2 和 HR 测量。共测量了 19 名习惯的通勤自行车运动员(9 名男性和 10 名女性),年龄为 44±3 岁。分析了基于通勤自行车的 3 个 HR 水平和测试和再测试的回归方程估算的 VO2 的可重复性。还研究了两个模型之间的差异。对于两个模型,测试和再测试之间的回归方程的组成部分(y 截距、斜率和 r 值)均无显着差异。测试和再测试之间的绝对 VO2 估计值也没有系统差异。基于三个不同 HR 水平的估计值,模型 1 的相对差异为 0.99±11.0(n.s.)、2.67±6.48(n.s.)和 3.57±6.24%(p<0.05),模型 2 为 1.09±10.6、1.75±6.43 和 2.12±5.92%(均 n.s.)。然而,两个模型中都有一些较大的个体差异。回归方程的斜率、截距或 r 值或 VO2 的估计水平在两个模型之间没有显着差异。在实验室中,基于 HR-VO2 关系从 HR 估计 VO2 消耗时,心率方法在组水平上显示出良好的可重复性,并且基于对自行车通勤具有代表性的 3 个 HR 水平。然而,在个体水平上,存在一些较大的变化。