Tan Xiaodong, Pan Yujing, Su Wei, Gong Shaoyu, Zhu Hongjun, Chen Hao, Lu Shu
The Graduate School, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing 210023, China.
Department of Cardiology, Wuxi Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Wuxi 214071, China.
Ann Transl Med. 2019 Jun;7(12):266. doi: 10.21037/atm.2019.05.59.
To evaluate the efficacy and safety of acupuncture therapies for the treatment of essential hypertension.
We performed a systematic electronic search of PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database (CBM), Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), and Wan-fang Data Database. The main outcome indicators measured were the amount of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), a change of blood pressure, and the response rate. STATA15.0 software was used for the network meta-analysis.
A total of 31 trials with 2,649 patients were included. Patients were allocated to 15 kinds of interventions. These including acupuncture types were electroacupuncture, moxibustion, warm needle therapy, sham acupuncture, behavioral therapy, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs), angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), calcium channel blocker (CCB), beta-blocker, acupuncture combined ACEI, acupuncture combined CCB, acupuncture combined behavior, electroacupuncture combined CCB, and non-treatment. The results of the network meta-analysis showed that there was no significant clinical or statistic difference in systolic blood pressure (SBP) change magnitude between acupuncture treatment and the other 14 therapies. Moxibustion may be better than acupuncture in reducing diastolic blood pressure (DBP) [mean difference (MD): 15.9, 95% confidence interval (CI): 5.96-25.85]. There was no significant difference in reducing DBP between acupuncture and the other 13 interventions. The effective rate of acupuncture combined with AECI [odds ratio (OR) =7.96, 95% CI: 1.11-56.92] and acupuncture combined with behavioral therapy (OR =3.53, 95% CI: 1.08-11.51) in treating hypertension was better than that of acupuncture alone, and there was no statistically significant difference in the effective rate between acupuncture and the other therapies.
The existing evidence shows that acupuncture could be used for treating hypertension, and it may have the same effects as common medication. However, due to the low qualities of the original studies, the quality of this evidence is poor. Therefore, it is recommended that more scientific research be performed to confirm the efficacy of acupuncture.
评估针灸疗法治疗原发性高血压的疗效和安全性。
我们对PubMed、Embase、Cochrane图书馆、中国生物医学文献数据库(CBM)、中国知网(CNKI)和万方数据库进行了系统的电子检索。测量的主要结局指标为主要心血管不良事件(MACE)的数量、血压变化和有效率。使用STATA15.0软件进行网络荟萃分析。
共纳入31项试验,涉及2649例患者。患者被分配到15种干预措施中。这些包括针灸类型有电针、艾灸、温针疗法、假针灸、行为疗法、血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(ACEI)、血管紧张素受体阻滞剂(ARB)、钙通道阻滞剂(CCB)、β受体阻滞剂、针灸联合ACEI、针灸联合CCB、针灸联合行为疗法、电针联合CCB以及不治疗。网络荟萃分析结果显示,针灸治疗与其他14种疗法之间收缩压(SBP)变化幅度在临床或统计学上无显著差异。艾灸在降低舒张压(DBP)方面可能优于针灸[平均差(MD):15.9,95%置信区间(CI):5.96 - 25.85]。针灸与其他13种干预措施在降低DBP方面无显著差异。针灸联合AECI[比值比(OR) = 7.96,95% CI:1.11 - 56.92]和针灸联合行为疗法(OR = 3.53,95% CI:1.08 - 11.51)治疗高血压的有效率优于单纯针灸,且针灸与其他疗法在有效率方面无统计学显著差异。
现有证据表明针灸可用于治疗高血压,且可能与常用药物有相同效果。然而,由于原始研究质量较低,该证据质量较差。因此,建议进行更多科学研究以证实针灸的疗效。