• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
New American and European Hypertension Guidelines, Reconciling the Differences.新的美国和欧洲高血压指南:调和差异
Cardiol Ther. 2019 Dec;8(2):157-166. doi: 10.1007/s40119-019-0144-3. Epub 2019 Jul 30.
2
Harmonization of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association and European Society of Cardiology/European Society of Hypertension Blood Pressure/Hypertension Guidelines: Comparisons, Reflections, and Recommendations.美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会与欧洲心脏病学会/欧洲高血压学会血压/高血压指南的协调:比较、反思和建议。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022 Sep 20;80(12):1192-1201. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2022.07.005. Epub 2022 Aug 11.
3
Harmonization of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association and European Society of Cardiology/European Society of Hypertension Blood Pressure/Hypertension Guidelines: Comparisons, Reflections, and Recommendations.美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会与欧洲心脏病学会/欧洲高血压学会血压/高血压指南的协调:比较、思考和建议。
Circulation. 2022 Sep 13;146(11):868-877. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.121.054602. Epub 2022 Aug 11.
4
Harmonization of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association and European Society of Cardiology/European Society of Hypertension Blood Pressure/Hypertension Guidelines.美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会与欧洲心脏病学会/欧洲高血压学会血压/高血压指南的协调统一。
Eur Heart J. 2022 Sep 14;43(35):3302-3311. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehac432.
5
Impact of the European and American guidelines on hypertension prevalence, treatment, and cardiometabolic goals.欧美指南对高血压患病率、治疗和心血管代谢目标的影响。
J Hypertens. 2019 Jul;37(7):1393-1400. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000002065.
6
Hong Kong College of Physicians Position Statement and Recommendations on the 2017 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association and 2018 European Society of Cardiology/European Society of Hypertension Guidelines for the Management of Arterial Hypertension.香港内科医学院关于2017年美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会以及2018年欧洲心脏病学会/欧洲高血压学会动脉高血压管理指南的立场声明及建议
Hong Kong Med J. 2020 Oct;26(5):432-437. doi: 10.12809/hkmj198330.
7
American, European and international hypertension guidelines: Time to shake hands?美国、欧洲及国际高血压指南:是时候握手言和了?
Int J Cardiol Hypertens. 2020 Dec 17;8:100075. doi: 10.1016/j.ijchy.2020.100075. eCollection 2021 Mar.
8
Population impact of different hypertension management guidelines based on the prospective population-based Heinz Nixdorf Recall study.基于前瞻性人群研究 Heinz Nixdorf Recall 对不同高血压管理指南的人群影响。
BMJ Open. 2021 Feb 17;11(2):e039597. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039597.
9
Recommendations and Associated Levels of Evidence for Statin Use in Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease: A Comparison at Population Level of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology/Multisociety, US Preventive Services Task Force, Department of Veterans Affairs/Department of Defense, Canadian Cardiovascular Society, and European Society of Cardiology/European Atherosclerosis Society Clinical Practice Guidelines.美国心脏协会/美国心脏病学会/多学会、美国预防服务工作组、美国退伍军人事务部/美国国防部、加拿大心血管学会、欧洲心脏病学会/欧洲动脉粥样硬化学会临床实践指南在一级预防心血管疾病中的他汀类药物使用建议及相关证据水平:人群水平比较。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2021 Sep;14(9):e007183. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.120.007183. Epub 2021 Sep 21.
10
2015 guidelines of the Taiwan Society of Cardiology and the Taiwan Hypertension Society for the management of hypertension.台湾心脏病学会与台湾高血压学会2015年高血压管理指南。
J Chin Med Assoc. 2015 Jan;78(1):1-47. doi: 10.1016/j.jcma.2014.11.005. Epub 2014 Dec 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Prevalence of hypertension and cardiovascular risk in patients with gastrointestinal angiodysplasia: the role of aortic stiffness and non-dipper blood pressure patterns; predictive value of novel inflammatory biomarkers.胃肠道血管发育异常患者的高血压患病率及心血管风险:主动脉僵硬度和非勺型血压模式的作用;新型炎症生物标志物的预测价值。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2025 Aug 26;12:1561853. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2025.1561853. eCollection 2025.
2
Barriers and solutions for global access to osteoporosis management: a Position Paper from the International Osteoporosis Foundation.全球骨质疏松症管理的障碍与解决方案:国际骨质疏松症基金会立场文件
Osteoporos Int. 2025 Aug 22. doi: 10.1007/s00198-025-07628-5.
3
Language as a catalyst for success: a blueprint for standardized terminology and multilingual health literacy in Pakistan.语言是成功的催化剂:巴基斯坦标准化术语和多语言健康素养蓝图。
Lancet Reg Health Southeast Asia. 2025 Feb 14;34:100544. doi: 10.1016/j.lansea.2025.100544. eCollection 2025 Mar.
4
Hypertension: A Continuing Public Healthcare Issue.高血压:一个持续存在的公共卫生问题。
Int J Mol Sci. 2024 Dec 26;26(1):123. doi: 10.3390/ijms26010123.
5
Conflating the Operational Definition of Osteoporosis with Intervention Thresholds.将骨质疏松症的操作定义与干预阈值混为一谈。
Calcif Tissue Int. 2025 Jan 3;116(1):22. doi: 10.1007/s00223-024-01336-8.
6
Diabetic cardiomyopathy: an educational review.糖尿病性心肌病:一篇教育性综述。
Br J Cardiol. 2023 Jun 13;30(2):18. doi: 10.5837/bjc.2023.018. eCollection 2023.
7
Comparison of the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of the FDC of telmisartan + bisoprolol with telmisartan + metoprolol succinate ER combination therapy for stage 1 and stage 2 hypertension: A double-blind, multicentric, phase-III clinical study.比较替米沙坦+比索洛尔复方制剂与替米沙坦+琥珀酸美托洛尔缓释片联合治疗 1 级和 2 级高血压的疗效、安全性和耐受性:一项双盲、多中心、III 期临床研究。
Indian Heart J. 2024 May-Jun;76(3):159-166. doi: 10.1016/j.ihj.2024.06.002. Epub 2024 Jun 12.
8
Outpatient management of essential hypertension: a review based on the latest clinical guidelines.原发性高血压的门诊管理:基于最新临床指南的综述。
Ann Med. 2024 Dec;56(1):2338242. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2024.2338242. Epub 2024 Apr 11.
9
Blood pressure difference between pre and post-menopausal women and age-matched men: A cross-sectional study at a tertiary center.绝经前后女性与年龄匹配男性之间的血压差异:一项在三级中心进行的横断面研究。
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2024 Dec;26(12):1368-1374. doi: 10.1111/jch.14801. Epub 2024 Mar 25.
10
Bioactive milk peptides: an updated comprehensive overview and database.生物活性牛奶肽:最新综合概述和数据库。
Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2024 Nov;64(31):11510-11529. doi: 10.1080/10408398.2023.2240396. Epub 2023 Jul 28.

本文引用的文献

1
2018 ESC/ESH Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension.2018年欧洲心脏病学会/欧洲高血压学会动脉高血压管理指南。
Eur Heart J. 2018 Sep 1;39(33):3021-3104. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy339.
2
Prevalence of Masked Hypertension in Untreated and Treated Patients With Office Blood Pressure Below 130/80 mm Hg.诊室血压低于130/80 mmHg的未治疗和已治疗患者中隐匿性高血压的患病率。
Circulation. 2018 Jun 12;137(24):2651-2653. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.034619. Epub 2018 Apr 30.
3
Relationship between Clinic and Ambulatory Blood-Pressure Measurements and Mortality.诊室血压测量和动态血压测量与死亡率的关系。
N Engl J Med. 2018 Apr 19;378(16):1509-1520. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1712231.
4
Potential US Population Impact of the 2017 ACC/AHA High Blood Pressure Guideline.2017ACC/AHA 高血压指南对美国人口的潜在影响。
Circulation. 2018 Jan 9;137(2):109-118. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.032582. Epub 2017 Nov 13.
5
2017 ACC/AHA/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/AGS/APhA/ASH/ASPC/NMA/PCNA Guideline for the Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Management of High Blood Pressure in Adults: Executive Summary: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines.2017美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会/美国医师助理学会/美国心脏病学学会/美国预防医学学院/美国老年医学会/美国药剂师协会/美国血液学会/美国预防心脏病学会/美国国家医学协会/美国初级保健医师学会成人高血压预防、检测、评估和管理指南:执行摘要:美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会临床实践指南工作组报告
Hypertension. 2018 Jun;71(6):1269-1324. doi: 10.1161/HYP.0000000000000066. Epub 2017 Nov 13.
6
Automated compared to manual office blood pressure and to home blood pressure in hypertensive patients.高血压患者中自动测量与诊室手动测量血压及家庭血压的比较。
Blood Press. 2016 Aug;25(4):228-34. doi: 10.3109/08037051.2015.1134086. Epub 2016 Feb 7.
7
A Randomized Trial of Intensive versus Standard Blood-Pressure Control.强化与标准血压控制的随机试验
N Engl J Med. 2015 Nov 26;373(22):2103-16. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1511939. Epub 2015 Nov 9.
8
Effects of blood pressure-lowering on outcome incidence in hypertension: 5. Head-to-head comparisons of various classes of antihypertensive drugs - overview and meta-analyses.血压降低对高血压患者结局发生率的影响:5. 各类降压药物的直接比较——综述与荟萃分析。
J Hypertens. 2015 Jul;33(7):1321-41. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000000614.
9
Blood pressure-lowering treatment based on cardiovascular risk: a meta-analysis of individual patient data.基于心血管风险的降压治疗:一项个体患者数据分析的荟萃分析。
Lancet. 2014 Aug 16;384(9943):591-598. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61212-5.
10
2013 ACC/AHA guideline on the assessment of cardiovascular risk: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines.2013年美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会心血管风险评估指南:美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会实践指南工作组报告
Circulation. 2014 Jun 24;129(25 Suppl 2):S49-73. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.0000437741.48606.98. Epub 2013 Nov 12.

新的美国和欧洲高血压指南:调和差异

New American and European Hypertension Guidelines, Reconciling the Differences.

作者信息

de la Sierra Alejandro

机构信息

Hypertension Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, Hospital Mútua Terrassa, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

Cardiol Ther. 2019 Dec;8(2):157-166. doi: 10.1007/s40119-019-0144-3. Epub 2019 Jul 30.

DOI:10.1007/s40119-019-0144-3
PMID:31363987
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6828883/
Abstract

In November 2017, the American College of Cardiology and the American Heart Association released hypertension guidelines for the first time, replacing the Joint National Committee periodical reports, appearing from 1977 to 2003. In parallel, the European Society of Cardiology and the European Society of Hypertension updated their own recommendations with a new document released in August 2018. While both documents contain similar recommendations concerning several aspects of detection, prevention, and management of hypertension, they differ in some sensitive characteristics, which specifically affect diagnostic and therapeutic aspects. While the European guidelines do not substantially modify previous recommendations, the American proposals are clearly disruptive. Main examples include a new definition for hypertension, with a blood pressure threshold of 130/80 mmHg. Not only does it modify its prevalence, but also carries important changes in therapeutic aspects, including treatment initiation and blood pressure goals for treated patients. In this review, the main differences between American and European recommendations are highlighted, along with the arguments exposed by both groups of experts and their possible impact affecting clinical practice in hypertension management.

摘要

2017年11月,美国心脏病学会和美国心脏协会首次发布高血压指南,取代了1977年至2003年发布的美国国家联合委员会定期报告。与此同时,欧洲心脏病学会和欧洲高血压学会在2018年8月发布的一份新文件中更新了他们自己的建议。虽然两份文件在高血压的检测、预防和管理的几个方面都包含类似的建议,但它们在一些敏感特征上有所不同,这些特征特别影响诊断和治疗方面。欧洲指南没有实质性修改先前的建议,而美国的提议显然具有颠覆性。主要例子包括高血压的新定义,血压阈值为130/80 mmHg。这不仅改变了高血压的患病率,而且在治疗方面带来了重要变化,包括治疗的开始和治疗患者的血压目标。在这篇综述中,强调了美国和欧洲建议之间的主要差异,以及两组专家提出的论据及其对高血压管理临床实践可能产生的影响。