Ooi Hui Ying, Tee Wan Yi, Davamani Fabian, Nagendrababu Venkateshbabu
School of Dentistry, International Medical University, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Division of Applied Biomedical Science and Biotechnology, School of Health Sciences, International Medical University, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
J Conserv Dent. 2019 May-Jun;22(3):241-244. doi: 10.4103/JCD.JCD_521_18.
The aim of this study is to compare the antimicrobial activity of pediocin with chlorhexidine (CHX) and calcium hydroxide (Ca(OH)) against and biofilms.
The prepared root canals of 80 teeth were contaminated with ( = 40) and ( = 40) for 21 days to create biofilms. The samples in each group were allocated randomly into the following four subgroups ( = 10) according to the decontamination protocol: Group 1: 1% Pediocin, Group 2: 2% CHX, Group 3: Ca(OH), and Group 4: saline (negative control). At 5 days, the antimicrobial efficacy of the medicaments against and was assessed by collecting dentin shavings from the canal walls created using Gates Glidden drill sizes 4 and 5, corresponding to a depth into the root canal walls of 200 μm and 400 μm, respectively. The total number of colony-forming units (CFUs) was counted. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to compare the difference in CFUs between the two depths ( > 0.05).
There was no bacterial growth in samples treated with pediocin, CHX, or Ca(OH) at either depth.
In this laboratory experimental model, pediocin exhibited the same antimicrobial properties against and as CHX and Ca(OH)
本研究旨在比较片球菌素与氯己定(CHX)和氢氧化钙(Ca(OH)₂)对[具体细菌名称缺失]和生物膜的抗菌活性。
将80颗牙齿制备的根管分别用[具体细菌名称缺失](n = 40)和[具体细菌名称缺失](n = 40)污染21天以形成生物膜。根据去污方案,每组样本随机分为以下四个亚组(n = 10):第1组:1%片球菌素,第2组:2% CHX,第3组:Ca(OH)₂,第4组:生理盐水(阴性对照)。在第5天,通过收集使用盖茨·格利登4号和5号钻针从根管壁获取的牙本质碎屑来评估药物对[具体细菌名称缺失]和[具体细菌名称缺失]的抗菌效果,对应根管壁深度分别为200μm和400μm。计算菌落形成单位(CFU)总数。采用威尔科克森符号秩检验比较两个深度的CFU差异(P > 0.05)。
在任一深度,用片球菌素、CHX或Ca(OH)₂处理的样本均无细菌生长。
在本实验室实验模型中,片球菌素对[具体细菌名称缺失]和[具体细菌名称缺失]表现出与CHX和Ca(OH)₂相同的抗菌特性