• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

认为曾感染过未经确诊的新冠病毒会降低参与基于应用程序的接触者追踪的意愿。

Belief of having had unconfirmed Covid-19 infection reduces willingness to participate in app-based contact tracing.

作者信息

Bachtiger Patrik, Adamson Alexander, Quint Jennifer K, Peters Nicholas S

机构信息

National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK.

Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.

出版信息

NPJ Digit Med. 2020 Nov 6;3(1):146. doi: 10.1038/s41746-020-00357-5.

DOI:10.1038/s41746-020-00357-5
PMID:33299071
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7648058/
Abstract

Contact tracing and lockdown are health policies being used worldwide to combat the coronavirus (COVID-19). The UK National Health Service (NHS) Track and Trace Service has plans for a nationwide app that notifies the need for self-isolation to those in contact with a person testing positive for COVID-19. To be successful, such an app will require high uptake, the determinants and willingness for which are unclear but essential to understand for effective public health benefit. The objective of this study was to measure the determinants of willingness to participate in an NHS app-based contact-tracing programme using a questionnaire within the Care Information Exchange (CIE)-the largest patient-facing electronic health record in the NHS. Among 47,708 registered NHS users of the CIE, 27% completed a questionnaire asking about willingness to participate in app-based contact tracing, understanding of government advice, mental and physical wellbeing and their healthcare utilisation-related or not to COVID-19. Descriptive statistics are reported alongside univariate and multivariable logistic regression models, with positive or negative responses to a question on app-based contact tracing as the dependent variable. 26.1% of all CIE participants were included in the analysis (N = 12,434, 43.0% male, mean age 55.2). 60.3% of respondents were willing to participate in app-based contact tracing. Out of those who responded 'no', 67.2% stated that this was due to privacy concerns. In univariate analysis, worsening mood, fear and anxiety in relation to changes in government rules around lockdown were associated with lower willingness to participate. Multivariable analysis showed that difficulty understanding government rules was associated with a decreased inclination to download the app, with those scoring 1-2 and 3-4 in their understanding of the new government rules being 45% and 27% less inclined to download the contact-tracing app, respectively; when compared to those who rated their understanding as 5-6/10 (OR for 1-2/10 = 0.57 [CI 0.48-0.67]; OR for 3-4/10 = 0.744 [CI 0.64-0.87]), whereas scores of 7-8 and 9-10 showed a 43% and 31% respective increase. Those reporting an unconfirmed belief of having previously had and recovered from COVID-19 were 27% less likely to be willing to download the app; belief of previous recovery from COVID-19 infection OR 0.727 [0.585-0.908]). In this large UK-wide questionnaire of wellbeing in lockdown, a willingness for app-based contact tracing over an appropriate age range is 60%-close to the estimated 56% population uptake, and substantially less than the smartphone-user uptake considered necessary for an app-based contact tracing to be an effective intervention to help suppress an epidemic. Difficulty comprehending government advice and uncertainty of diagnosis, based on a public health policy of not testing to confirm self-reported COVID-19 infection during lockdown, therefore reduce willingness to adopt a government contact-tracing app to a level below the threshold for effectiveness as a tool to suppress an epidemic.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9a6a/7648058/c741439585b9/41746_2020_357_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9a6a/7648058/c741439585b9/41746_2020_357_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9a6a/7648058/c741439585b9/41746_2020_357_Fig1_HTML.jpg
摘要

接触者追踪和封锁是全球范围内用于抗击冠状病毒(COVID-19)的卫生政策。英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)的追踪服务计划推出一款全国性应用程序,向与COVID-19检测呈阳性者有过接触的人通报自我隔离的必要性。要取得成功,这样一款应用程序需要高使用率,但其决定因素和意愿尚不清楚,但对于实现有效的公共卫生效益而言,了解这些因素至关重要。本研究的目的是通过在护理信息交换(CIE)中使用问卷来衡量参与基于NHS应用程序的接触者追踪计划的意愿的决定因素,CIE是NHS中最大的面向患者的电子健康记录。在47708名注册的CIE NHS用户中,27%的人完成了一份问卷,询问他们参与基于应用程序的接触者追踪的意愿、对政府建议的理解、身心健康状况以及他们与COVID-19相关或无关的医疗保健利用情况。描述性统计数据与单变量和多变量逻辑回归模型一起报告,以对基于应用程序的接触者追踪问题的肯定或否定回答作为因变量。所有CIE参与者中的26.1%被纳入分析(N = 12434,43.0%为男性,平均年龄55.2岁)。60.3%的受访者愿意参与基于应用程序的接触者追踪。在回答“不愿意”的人中,67.2%表示这是出于隐私担忧。在单变量分析中,与政府围绕封锁的规定变化相关的情绪恶化、恐惧和焦虑与较低的参与意愿相关。多变量分析表明,理解政府规定困难与下载应用程序的意愿降低相关,对新政府规定理解评分为1 - 2分和3 - 4分的人下载接触者追踪应用程序的意愿分别比将理解评为5 - 6/10分的人低45%和27%;与那些将理解评为7 - 8分和9 - 10分的人相比,分别增加了43%和31%。那些报告未经证实但相信自己曾感染COVID-19并已康复的人下载应用程序的意愿降低了27%;相信曾从COVID-19感染中康复OR 0.727 [0.585 - 0.908])。在这份关于英国范围内封锁期间幸福感的大型问卷中,在适当年龄范围内基于应用程序的接触者追踪意愿为60%,接近估计的56%的人口使用率,但远低于基于应用程序的接触者追踪成为有效抑制疫情干预措施所需的智能手机用户使用率。基于在封锁期间不进行检测以确认自我报告的COVID-19感染的公共卫生政策,理解政府建议的困难和诊断的不确定性,因此将采用政府接触者追踪应用程序的意愿降低到低于作为抑制疫情工具的有效性阈值的水平。

相似文献

1
Belief of having had unconfirmed Covid-19 infection reduces willingness to participate in app-based contact tracing.认为曾感染过未经确诊的新冠病毒会降低参与基于应用程序的接触者追踪的意愿。
NPJ Digit Med. 2020 Nov 6;3(1):146. doi: 10.1038/s41746-020-00357-5.
2
Resident Willingness to Participate in Digital Contact Tracing in a COVID-19 Hotspot: Findings From a Detroit Panel Study.居民参与新冠疫情热点地区数字接触者追踪的意愿:来自底特律小组研究的发现。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2023 Jan 19;9:e39002. doi: 10.2196/39002.
3
Public Adoption of and Trust in the NHS COVID-19 Contact Tracing App in the United Kingdom: Quantitative Online Survey Study.英国国民保健制度 (NHS) COVID-19 接触者追踪应用程序的公众采用和信任:定量在线调查研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Sep 17;23(9):e29085. doi: 10.2196/29085.
4
The Roles of General Health and COVID-19 Proximity in Contact Tracing App Usage: Cross-sectional Survey Study.一般健康状况和与 COVID-19 的接近程度在接触者追踪应用程序使用中的作用:横断面调查研究。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2021 Aug 18;7(8):e27892. doi: 10.2196/27892.
5
Acceptability of App-Based Contact Tracing for COVID-19: Cross-Country Survey Study.基于应用程序的 COVID-19 接触者追踪的可接受性:跨国调查研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Aug 28;8(8):e19857. doi: 10.2196/19857.
6
Early Acceptability of a Mobile App for Contact Tracing During the COVID-19 Pandemic in France: National Web-Based Survey.COVID-19 大流行期间法国使用移动应用程序进行接触者追踪的早期接受度:全国性网络调查。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Jul 19;9(7):e27768. doi: 10.2196/27768.
7
Public attitudes towards COVID-19 contact tracing apps: A UK-based focus group study.公众对 COVID-19 接触者追踪应用程序的态度:基于英国的焦点小组研究。
Health Expect. 2021 Apr;24(2):377-385. doi: 10.1111/hex.13179. Epub 2021 Jan 12.
8
Peer-to-Peer Contact Tracing: Development of a Privacy-Preserving Smartphone App.点对点接触追踪:隐私保护智能手机应用程序的开发。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Apr 7;8(4):e18936. doi: 10.2196/18936.
9
A national survey of attitudes to COVID-19 digital contact tracing in the Republic of Ireland.爱尔兰共和国对 COVID-19 数字接触追踪的全国性态度调查。
Ir J Med Sci. 2021 Aug;190(3):863-887. doi: 10.1007/s11845-020-02389-y. Epub 2020 Oct 16.
10
To Use or Not to Use a COVID-19 Contact Tracing App: Mixed Methods Survey in Wales.使用还是不使用 COVID-19 接触者追踪应用程序:威尔士的混合方法调查。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Nov 22;9(11):e29181. doi: 10.2196/29181.

引用本文的文献

1
Willingness to Use Digital Health Screening and Tracking Tools for Public Health in Sexual Minority Populations in a National Probability Sample: Quantitative Intersectional Analysis.在全国概率样本中,性少数群体对公共卫生数字健康筛查和跟踪工具的使用意愿:定量交叉分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Mar 8;26:e47448. doi: 10.2196/47448.
2
Developing and Evaluating a Measure of the Willingness to Use Pandemic-Related mHealth Tools Using National Probability Samples in the United States: Quantitative Psychometric Analyses and Tests of Sociodemographic Group Differences.利用美国全国概率样本开发和评估使用大流行相关移动健康工具的意愿量表:定量心理测量分析及社会人口学群体差异测试
JMIR Form Res. 2023 Feb 7;7:e38298. doi: 10.2196/38298.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Covid-19: MPs call on Public Health England to publish evidence for decision to drop community testing.新冠疫情:议员呼吁英国公共卫生部公布取消社区检测决定的依据。
BMJ. 2020 May 19;369:m2022. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m2022.
2
Impact of climate and public health interventions on the COVID-19 pandemic: a prospective cohort study.气候和公共卫生干预措施对 COVID-19 大流行的影响:一项前瞻性队列研究。
CMAJ. 2020 May 25;192(21):E566-E573. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.200920. Epub 2020 May 8.
3
Covid-19: UK pledges to reintroduce contact tracing to fight virus.
What makes people install a COVID-19 contact-tracing app? Understanding the influence of app design and individual difference on contact-tracing app adoption intention.
是什么促使人们安装新冠病毒接触者追踪应用程序?了解应用程序设计和个体差异对接触者追踪应用程序采用意愿的影响。
Pervasive Mob Comput. 2021 Aug;75:101439. doi: 10.1016/j.pmcj.2021.101439. Epub 2021 Jun 17.
4
The relationship between trust and attitudes towards the COVID-19 digital contact-tracing app in the UK.英国民众对 COVID-19 数字接触追踪应用程序的信任与态度之间的关系。
PLoS One. 2022 Oct 27;17(10):e0276661. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0276661. eCollection 2022.
5
Willingness to share contacts in case of COVID-19 positivity-predictors of collaboration resistance in a nation-wide Italian survey.在一项全国性的意大利调查中,针对 COVID-19 阳性病例,人们分享联系方式的意愿——合作抵制的预测因素。
PLoS One. 2022 Sep 27;17(9):e0274902. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0274902. eCollection 2022.
6
Public Perceptions of Harms and Benefit of COVID-19 Immunity Certificate: A Cross-Sectional Study in the Italian Setting.公众对新冠病毒免疫证书的危害与益处的认知:意大利背景下的一项横断面研究
Vaccines (Basel). 2022 Sep 8;10(9):1501. doi: 10.3390/vaccines10091501.
7
Fantastic perspectives and where to find them: involving patients and citizens in digital health research.奇妙的前景以及如何找到它们:让患者和公众参与数字健康研究
Res Involv Engagem. 2022 Aug 2;8(1):37. doi: 10.1186/s40900-022-00374-6.
8
Public Perspectives on Exposure Notification Apps: A Patient and Citizen Co-Designed Study.公众对暴露通知应用程序的看法:一项患者与公民共同设计的研究
J Pers Med. 2022 Apr 30;12(5):729. doi: 10.3390/jpm12050729.
9
A Case Study of Bluetooth Technology as a Supplemental Tool in Contact Tracing.蓝牙技术作为接触者追踪辅助工具的案例研究
J Healthc Inform Res. 2022 Jan 19;6(2):208-227. doi: 10.1007/s41666-021-00112-9. eCollection 2022 Jun.
10
Characteristics and determinants of population acceptance of COVID-19 digital contact tracing: a systematic review.新冠病毒数字接触者追踪技术的公众接受特征和决定因素:系统综述。
Acta Biomed. 2021 Dec 10;92(S6):e2021444. doi: 10.23750/abm.v92iS6.12234.
新冠疫情:英国承诺重新引入接触者追踪以对抗病毒。
BMJ. 2020 Apr 21;369:m1591. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m1591.
4
Impact assessment of non-pharmaceutical interventions against coronavirus disease 2019 and influenza in Hong Kong: an observational study.非药物干预措施对 2019 年冠状病毒病和流感在香港的影响评估:一项观察性研究。
Lancet Public Health. 2020 May;5(5):e279-e288. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(20)30090-6. Epub 2020 Apr 17.
5
Aging in Times of the COVID-19 Pandemic: Avoiding Ageism and Fostering Intergenerational Solidarity.新冠疫情时代的老龄化:避免年龄歧视,促进代际团结。
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2021 Jan 18;76(2):e49-e52. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbaa051.
6
Projecting the transmission dynamics of SARS-CoV-2 through the postpandemic period.预测 SARS-CoV-2 的传播动力学,直至大流行后期。
Science. 2020 May 22;368(6493):860-868. doi: 10.1126/science.abb5793. Epub 2020 Apr 14.
7
Quantifying SARS-CoV-2 transmission suggests epidemic control with digital contact tracing.量化 SARS-CoV-2 传播表明数字接触者追踪可控制疫情。
Science. 2020 May 8;368(6491). doi: 10.1126/science.abb6936. Epub 2020 Mar 31.
8
The effect of control strategies to reduce social mixing on outcomes of the COVID-19 epidemic in Wuhan, China: a modelling study.控制策略对减少社交接触以控制中国武汉 COVID-19 疫情的效果:建模研究。
Lancet Public Health. 2020 May;5(5):e261-e270. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(20)30073-6. Epub 2020 Mar 25.
9
The global community needs to swiftly ramp up the response to contain COVID-19.全球社会需要迅速加强应对措施以遏制新冠病毒。
Lancet. 2020 Apr 4;395(10230):1109-1110. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30679-6. Epub 2020 Mar 19.
10
Clinical course and risk factors for mortality of adult inpatients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: a retrospective cohort study.中国武汉成人 COVID-19 住院患者的临床病程和死亡危险因素:一项回顾性队列研究。
Lancet. 2020 Mar 28;395(10229):1054-1062. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30566-3. Epub 2020 Mar 11.