• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

预 EDIT:弹力导向性胸腔内置管或滑石粉胸膜固定术治疗恶性胸腔积液的随机可行性试验。

Pre-EDIT: A Randomized Feasibility Trial of Elastance-Directed Intrapleural Catheter or Talc Pleurodesis in Malignant Pleural Effusion.

机构信息

Pleural Disease Unit, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, UK; Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.

Pleural Disease Unit, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, UK.

出版信息

Chest. 2019 Dec;156(6):1204-1213. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2019.07.010. Epub 2019 Jul 30.

DOI:10.1016/j.chest.2019.07.010
PMID:31374208
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Talc slurry pleurodesis (TSP) prevents recurrence of symptomatic malignant pleural effusion (MPE) in 71% to 78% patients. Nonexpansile lung (NEL) frequently accounts for TSP failure but is often occult predrainage, impairing selection of patients. NEL is associated with high pleural elastance (P), but technical limitations have hampered the development of P as a predictive NEL marker. We performed a single-center, randomized, controlled, open-label feasibility trial of EDIT (elastance-directed indwelling pleural catheter or TSP) management, using a novel digital manometer and a new definition of high P.

METHODS

Patients with symptomatic MPE were randomized 1:1 between EDIT and standard care (TSP). EDIT involved P assessment during large-volume thoracentesis; patients with high P (maximum P sustained over 250 mL [MaxP] ≥ 14.5 cm HO/L) were allocated to immediately receive an indwelling pleural catheter; the remainder underwent immediate drain placement for TSP. The primary outcome measure was recruitment feasibility, defined a priori as 30 patients over 12 months. Secondary outcomes included safety, technical reliability, and the aspiration volume required to detect high P. The accuracy of the P definition for NEL was analyzed post hoc.

RESULTS

Thirty-one patients were randomized (one allocation failure) over 12 months. P assessment (mean duration, 33 minutes) was successful in 13 of 15 patients (87%). No directly attributable serious adverse events occurred. High P was detected in seven of 13 patients (54%), associated with 100% sensitivity and 67% specificity for NEL, and was first detected at a median volume of 325 mL (range, 250-800 mL).

CONCLUSIONS

A phase 3 trial testing the effect of EDIT management on symptomatic MPE recurrence following TSP is feasible.

TRIAL REGISTRY

ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT03319186; URL: www.clinicaltrials.gov.

摘要

背景

滑石粉浆胸膜固定术(TSP)可使 71%至 78%的有症状恶性胸腔积液(MPE)患者复发。非扩张性肺(NEL)常导致 TSP 失败,但常为引流前隐匿性,影响患者选择。NEL 与高胸膜弹性(P)相关,但技术限制阻碍了 P 作为预测 NEL 标志物的发展。我们进行了一项单中心、随机、对照、开放性 EDIT(弹性导向留置胸膜导管或 TSP)管理的可行性试验,使用了一种新型数字测压计和高 P 的新定义。

方法

有症状 MPE 的患者按 1:1 随机分为 EDIT 和标准治疗(TSP)组。EDIT 包括大容量胸腔穿刺时的 P 评估;高 P(最大 P 持续超过 250 mL [MaxP]≥14.5 cm HO/L)的患者立即分配留置胸膜导管;其余患者立即放置引流管进行 TSP。主要结局指标为预先定义的招募可行性,定义为 12 个月内 30 例患者。次要结局包括安全性、技术可靠性和检测高 P 所需的抽吸量。事后分析了 P 定义对 NEL 的准确性。

结果

12 个月内随机分配了 31 例患者(1 例分配失败)。15 例患者中的 13 例(87%)成功进行了 P 评估(平均持续时间 33 分钟)。无直接归因的严重不良事件发生。13 例患者中的 7 例(54%)检测到高 P,NEL 的敏感性为 100%,特异性为 67%,中位检测体积为 325 mL(范围 250-800 mL)。

结论

检测 EDIT 管理对 TSP 后有症状 MPE 复发影响的 3 期试验是可行的。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov;编号:NCT03319186;网址:www.clinicaltrials.gov。

相似文献

1
Pre-EDIT: A Randomized Feasibility Trial of Elastance-Directed Intrapleural Catheter or Talc Pleurodesis in Malignant Pleural Effusion.预 EDIT:弹力导向性胸腔内置管或滑石粉胸膜固定术治疗恶性胸腔积液的随机可行性试验。
Chest. 2019 Dec;156(6):1204-1213. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2019.07.010. Epub 2019 Jul 30.
2
Pre-EDIT: protocol for a randomised feasibility trial of elastance-directed intrapleural catheter or talc pleurodesis (EDIT) in malignant pleural effusion.编辑前:弹性导向胸腔内导管或滑石粉胸膜固定术(EDIT)治疗恶性胸腔积液的随机可行性试验方案
BMJ Open Respir Res. 2018 May 29;5(1):e000293. doi: 10.1136/bmjresp-2018-000293. eCollection 2018.
3
Effect of an Indwelling Pleural Catheter vs Talc Pleurodesis on Hospitalization Days in Patients With Malignant Pleural Effusion: The AMPLE Randomized Clinical Trial.留置胸膜导管与滑石粉胸膜固定术对恶性胸腔积液患者住院天数的影响:AMPLE随机临床试验
JAMA. 2017 Nov 21;318(19):1903-1912. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.17426.
4
Interventions for the management of malignant pleural effusions: a network meta-analysis.恶性胸腔积液管理的干预措施:一项网状荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 May 8;2016(5):CD010529. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010529.pub2.
5
A randomized controlled trial comparing indwelling pleural catheters with talc pleurodesis (NVALT-14).一项比较留置胸膜导管与滑石粉胸膜固定术的随机对照试验(NVALT - 14)。
Lung Cancer. 2017 Jun;108:9-14. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2017.01.019. Epub 2017 Feb 16.
6
Interventions for the management of malignant pleural effusions: a network meta-analysis.恶性胸腔积液管理的干预措施:一项网状Meta分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Apr 21;4(4):CD010529. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010529.pub3.
7
The Relationship of Pleural Manometry With Postthoracentesis Chest Radiographic Findings in Malignant Pleural Effusion.胸腔测压与恶性胸腔积液胸穿后胸部 X 线表现的关系。
Chest. 2020 Feb;157(2):421-426. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2019.08.1920. Epub 2019 Aug 28.
8
OPTIMUM: a protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial comparing Out Patient Talc slurry via Indwelling pleural catheter for Malignant pleural effusion vs Usual inpatient Management.OPTIMUM:一项多中心随机对照试验方案,比较经留置胸膜导管的门诊滑石粉悬液治疗恶性胸腔积液与常规住院治疗。
BMJ Open. 2016 Oct 18;6(10):e012795. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012795.
9
Australasian Malignant PLeural Effusion (AMPLE)-3 trial: study protocol for a multi-centre randomised study comparing indwelling pleural catheter (±talc pleurodesis) versus video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for management of malignant pleural effusion.澳大利亚恶性胸腔积液(AMPLE)-3 试验:一项多中心随机研究的研究方案,比较留置胸腔导管(±滑石粉胸膜固定术)与电视辅助胸腔镜手术治疗恶性胸腔积液。
Trials. 2022 Jun 27;23(1):530. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06405-7.
10
Effect of an indwelling pleural catheter vs chest tube and talc pleurodesis for relieving dyspnea in patients with malignant pleural effusion: the TIME2 randomized controlled trial.留置胸腔导管与胸腔引流管和滑石粉胸膜固定术治疗恶性胸腔积液呼吸困难的效果:TIME2 随机对照试验。
JAMA. 2012 Jun 13;307(22):2383-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.5535.

引用本文的文献

1
Updates in the management of malignant pleural effusion: a clinical practice review.恶性胸腔积液管理的最新进展:临床实践综述
J Thorac Dis. 2025 Aug 31;17(8):6283-6295. doi: 10.21037/jtd-2025-113. Epub 2025 Jul 28.
2
Thoracic Ultrasound for Pre-Procedural Dynamic Assessment of Non-Expandable Lung: A Non-Invasive, Real-Time and Multifaceted Diagnostic Tool.胸部超声用于不可扩张肺的术前动态评估:一种非侵入性、实时且多维度的诊断工具。
J Clin Med. 2025 Mar 18;14(6):2062. doi: 10.3390/jcm14062062.
3
Association between terminal pleural elastance and radiographic lung re-expansion after therapeutic thoracentesis in patients with symptomatic pleural effusion: a post-hoc analysis of a randomised trial.
胸膜弹性终端与症状性胸腔积液患者治疗性胸腔穿刺后肺复张的关系:一项随机试验的事后分析。
BMJ Open. 2022 Jul 12;12(7):e053606. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053606.
4
Diagnosis and Management of Malignant Pleural Effusion: A Decade in Review.恶性胸腔积液的诊断与管理:十年回顾
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Apr 18;12(4):1016. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12041016.
5
Diagnostics in Pleural Disease.胸膜疾病的诊断
Diagnostics (Basel). 2020 Dec 4;10(12):1046. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics10121046.
6
Pleural Space Elastance and Its Relation to Success Rates of Pleurodesis in Malignant Pleural Effusion.胸膜腔弹性及其与恶性胸腔积液胸膜固定术成功率的关系。
Tuberc Respir Dis (Seoul). 2021 Jan;84(1):67-73. doi: 10.4046/trd.2020.0081. Epub 2020 Nov 9.
7
Critical analysis of the utility of initial pleural aspiration in the diagnosis and management of suspected malignant pleural effusion.对初始胸膜抽吸在疑似恶性胸腔积液的诊断和管理中的效用进行批判性分析。
BMJ Open Respir Res. 2020 Sep;7(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjresp-2020-000701.
8
Pleural manometry: techniques, applications, and pitfalls.胸腔测压法:技术、应用及陷阱
J Thorac Dis. 2020 May;12(5):2759-2770. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2020.04.04.
9
Interventions for the management of malignant pleural effusions: a network meta-analysis.恶性胸腔积液管理的干预措施:一项网状Meta分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Apr 21;4(4):CD010529. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010529.pub3.