• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

编辑前:弹性导向胸腔内导管或滑石粉胸膜固定术(EDIT)治疗恶性胸腔积液的随机可行性试验方案

Pre-EDIT: protocol for a randomised feasibility trial of elastance-directed intrapleural catheter or talc pleurodesis (EDIT) in malignant pleural effusion.

作者信息

Martin Geoffrey A, Tsim Selina, Kidd Andrew C, Foster John E, McLoone Philip, Chalmers Anthony, Blyth Kevin G

机构信息

Pleural Disease Unit, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, UK.

Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Open Respir Res. 2018 May 29;5(1):e000293. doi: 10.1136/bmjresp-2018-000293. eCollection 2018.

DOI:10.1136/bmjresp-2018-000293
PMID:29862030
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5976095/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Non-expansile lung (NEL) is a common cause of talc pleurodesis (TP) failure in malignant pleural effusion (MPE), but is often occult prior to drainage. Reliable detection of NEL would allow patients to be allocated between intrapleural catheter (IPC) and TP. High pleural elastance (P) has been associated with NEL in observational studies. Pre-EDIT is a randomised feasibility trial of elastance-directed IPC or TP (EDIT) management using a novel, purpose-built digital pleural manometer (Rocket Medical, UK).

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

Consecutive patients with MPE without prior evidence of NEL or preference for IPC will be randomised 1:1 between EDIT management and standard care (an attempt at TP). The primary objective is to determine whether sufficient numbers of patients (defined as 30 within 12 months (or 15 over 6 months)) can be recruited and randomised to justify a subsequent phase III trial testing the efficacy of EDIT management. Secondary objectives include safety, technical feasibility and validation of study design elements, including the definition of P using 4D pleural MRI before and after fluid aspiration. EDIT involves P assessment during a large volume pleural fluid aspiration, followed by an attempt at TP or placement of an IPC within 24 hours. Patients will be allocated to IPC if the rolling average P sustained over at least 250 mL fluid aspirated (P) is ≥ 14.5 cm HO/L.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Pre-EDIT was approved by the West of Scotland Regional Ethics Committee on 8 March 2017 (Ref: 17/WS/0042). Results will be presented at scientific meetings and published in peer-reviewed journals.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT03319186; Pre-results.

摘要

引言

非扩张性肺(NEL)是恶性胸腔积液(MPE)中滑石粉胸膜固定术(TP)失败的常见原因,但在胸腔引流前通常难以察觉。可靠检测NEL将有助于在胸腔内导管(IPC)和TP之间合理分配患者。在观察性研究中,高胸膜弹性(P)与NEL相关。Pre-EDIT是一项随机可行性试验,采用新型特制数字胸膜压力计(英国Rocket Medical公司)对弹性导向的IPC或TP(EDIT)管理进行研究。

方法与分析

连续入选的无NEL既往证据或无IPC偏好的MPE患者将按1:1随机分配至EDIT管理组和标准治疗组(尝试进行TP)。主要目标是确定是否能招募到足够数量的患者(定义为12个月内30例(或6个月内15例))并进行随机分组,以证明后续III期试验检验EDIT管理疗效的合理性。次要目标包括安全性、技术可行性以及研究设计要素的验证,包括通过液体抽吸前后的4D胸膜MRI定义P。EDIT包括在大量胸腔积液抽吸过程中评估P,然后在24小时内尝试进行TP或放置IPC。如果在至少抽吸250 mL液体期间维持的滚动平均P(P)≥14.5 cm H₂O/L,则将患者分配至IPC组。

伦理与传播

Pre-EDIT于2017年3月8日获得苏格兰西部地区伦理委员会批准(参考编号:17/WS/0042)。研究结果将在科学会议上公布,并发表在同行评审期刊上。

试验注册号

NCT03319186;预结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e7d/5976095/4592b06b46ac/bmjresp-2018-000293f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e7d/5976095/05e76c9b858f/bmjresp-2018-000293f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e7d/5976095/4592b06b46ac/bmjresp-2018-000293f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e7d/5976095/05e76c9b858f/bmjresp-2018-000293f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e7d/5976095/4592b06b46ac/bmjresp-2018-000293f02.jpg

相似文献

1
Pre-EDIT: protocol for a randomised feasibility trial of elastance-directed intrapleural catheter or talc pleurodesis (EDIT) in malignant pleural effusion.编辑前:弹性导向胸腔内导管或滑石粉胸膜固定术(EDIT)治疗恶性胸腔积液的随机可行性试验方案
BMJ Open Respir Res. 2018 May 29;5(1):e000293. doi: 10.1136/bmjresp-2018-000293. eCollection 2018.
2
Pre-EDIT: A Randomized Feasibility Trial of Elastance-Directed Intrapleural Catheter or Talc Pleurodesis in Malignant Pleural Effusion.预 EDIT:弹力导向性胸腔内置管或滑石粉胸膜固定术治疗恶性胸腔积液的随机可行性试验。
Chest. 2019 Dec;156(6):1204-1213. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2019.07.010. Epub 2019 Jul 30.
3
Australasian Malignant PLeural Effusion (AMPLE)-4 trial: study protocol for a multi-centre randomised trial of topical antibiotics prophylaxis for infections of indwelling pleural catheters.澳大利亚恶性胸腔积液(AMPLE)-4 试验:一项多中心随机试验的研究方案,该试验旨在研究局部抗生素预防留置胸腔导管感染的效果。
Trials. 2024 Apr 10;25(1):249. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08065-1.
4
OPTIMUM: a protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial comparing Out Patient Talc slurry via Indwelling pleural catheter for Malignant pleural effusion vs Usual inpatient Management.OPTIMUM:一项多中心随机对照试验方案,比较经留置胸膜导管的门诊滑石粉悬液治疗恶性胸腔积液与常规住院治疗。
BMJ Open. 2016 Oct 18;6(10):e012795. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012795.
5
Protocol of the Australasian Malignant Pleural Effusion-2 (AMPLE-2) trial: a multicentre randomised study of aggressive versus symptom-guided drainage via indwelling pleural catheters.澳大利亚恶性胸腔积液-2(AMPLE-2)试验方案:一项关于通过留置胸腔导管进行积极引流与症状引导引流的多中心随机研究。
BMJ Open. 2016 Jul 5;6(7):e011480. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011480.
6
A randomized controlled trial comparing indwelling pleural catheters with talc pleurodesis (NVALT-14).一项比较留置胸膜导管与滑石粉胸膜固定术的随机对照试验(NVALT - 14)。
Lung Cancer. 2017 Jun;108:9-14. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2017.01.019. Epub 2017 Feb 16.
7
Evaluating the efficacy of thoracoscopy and talc poudrage versus pleurodesis using talc slurry (TAPPS trial): protocol of an open-label randomised controlled trial.评估胸腔镜滑石粉喷洒与滑石粉悬液胸膜固定术的疗效(TAPPS试验):一项开放标签随机对照试验方案
BMJ Open. 2014 Nov 26;4(11):e007045. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-007045.
8
Management of malignant pleural effusions with indwelling pleural catheters or talc pleurodesis.留置胸腔导管或滑石粉胸膜固定术治疗恶性胸腔积液。
Can Respir J. 2013 Mar-Apr;20(2):106-10. doi: 10.1155/2013/842768.
9
The efficacy of indwelling pleural catheter placement versus placement plus talc sclerosant in patients with malignant pleural effusions managed exclusively as outpatients (IPC-PLUS): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.门诊单独管理的恶性胸腔积液患者留置胸膜导管与留置胸膜导管加滑石硬化剂的疗效比较(IPC-PLUS):一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2015 Feb 12;16:48. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-0563-y.
10
Effect of an indwelling pleural catheter vs chest tube and talc pleurodesis for relieving dyspnea in patients with malignant pleural effusion: the TIME2 randomized controlled trial.留置胸腔导管与胸腔引流管和滑石粉胸膜固定术治疗恶性胸腔积液呼吸困难的效果:TIME2 随机对照试验。
JAMA. 2012 Jun 13;307(22):2383-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.5535.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison between pleurodesis results by 50% glucose solution, versus Bleomycin pleurodesis in patients with malignant pleural effusion.50%葡萄糖溶液与博来霉素对恶性胸腔积液患者进行胸膜固定术的效果比较。
Int J Physiol Pathophysiol Pharmacol. 2023 Oct 15;15(5):134-141. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Early Contrast Enhancement: A novel magnetic resonance imaging biomarker of pleural malignancy.早期对比增强:胸膜恶性肿瘤的新型磁共振成像生物标志物。
Lung Cancer. 2018 Apr;118:48-56. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2018.01.014. Epub 2018 Feb 3.
2
Effect of an Indwelling Pleural Catheter vs Talc Pleurodesis on Hospitalization Days in Patients With Malignant Pleural Effusion: The AMPLE Randomized Clinical Trial.留置胸膜导管与滑石粉胸膜固定术对恶性胸腔积液患者住院天数的影响:AMPLE随机临床试验
JAMA. 2017 Nov 21;318(19):1903-1912. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.17426.
3
Evaluation of imaging techniques for the assessment of tumour progression in an orthotopic rat model of malignant pleural mesothelioma†.
在恶性胸膜间皮瘤原位大鼠模型中评估用于肿瘤进展评估的成像技术†
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2015 Jan;47(1):e34-41. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezu393. Epub 2014 Oct 25.
4
Predicting survival in malignant pleural effusion: development and validation of the LENT prognostic score.预测恶性胸腔积液的生存率:LENT预后评分的制定与验证
Thorax. 2014 Dec;69(12):1098-104. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2014-205285. Epub 2014 Aug 6.
5
A new method for performing continuous manometry during pleural effusion drainage.一种在胸腔积液引流期间进行连续测压的新方法。
Respiration. 2014;88(1):61-6. doi: 10.1159/000358842. Epub 2014 May 7.
6
Symptom management in patients with lung cancer: Diagnosis and management of lung cancer, 3rd ed: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines.肺癌患者症状管理:肺癌的诊断与管理,第 3 版:美国胸科学会循证临床实践指南。
Chest. 2013 May;143(5 Suppl):e455S-e497S. doi: 10.1378/chest.12-2366.
7
Effect of an indwelling pleural catheter vs chest tube and talc pleurodesis for relieving dyspnea in patients with malignant pleural effusion: the TIME2 randomized controlled trial.留置胸腔导管与胸腔引流管和滑石粉胸膜固定术治疗恶性胸腔积液呼吸困难的效果:TIME2 随机对照试验。
JAMA. 2012 Jun 13;307(22):2383-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.5535.
8
Comparison of long and short axis quantification of left ventricular volume parameters by cardiovascular magnetic resonance, with ex-vivo validation.心血管磁共振长轴和短轴左心室容积参数定量比较及其与离体验证。
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2011 Aug 11;13(1):40. doi: 10.1186/1532-429X-13-40.
9
The unexpandable lung.不可扩张的肺
F1000 Med Rep. 2010 Oct 21;2:77. doi: 10.3410/M2-77.
10
Local anaesthetic thoracoscopy: British Thoracic Society Pleural Disease Guideline 2010.局部麻醉胸腔镜检查:英国胸科学会胸膜疾病指南2010版
Thorax. 2010 Aug;65 Suppl 2:ii54-60. doi: 10.1136/thx.2010.137018.