Libonati J P, Stager C E, Davis J R, Siddiqi S H
Maryland Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, Baltimore 21203.
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1988 May;10(1):41-8. doi: 10.1016/0732-8893(88)90125-3.
Direct-drug-susceptibility tests were performed on clinical specimens positive for acid-fast bacilli by either Ziehl-Neelsen or fluorochrome staining. The results of conventional agar dilution (Vestal, 1975) and a modified radiometric (BACTEC) method were compared. A total of 580 smear-positive specimens were tested by the BACTEC method at three separate sites. Three hundred and seventy-seven of these were culture positive for M. tuberculosis, and 343 (91%) yielded acceptable direct-susceptibility-test results. We used the conventional method to determine that 343 of 519 smear-positive specimens were culture positive for M. tuberculosis, and 212 (62%) produced acceptable results within 3 wks. Conventional results were reported in 3-4 wks, while the time required to obtain results with the BACTEC method ranged from 5 to 21 days (average 11.5 days). Results indicate that the radiometric method provides reportable results more frequently with time savings as compared to the conventional method.
对经齐-尼氏染色或荧光染色抗酸杆菌呈阳性的临床标本进行直接药敏试验。比较了传统琼脂稀释法(维斯塔尔,1975年)和改良放射测量法(BACTEC)的结果。通过BACTEC方法在三个不同地点对总共580份涂片阳性标本进行了检测。其中377份培养出结核分枝杆菌呈阳性,343份(91%)获得了可接受的直接药敏试验结果。我们用传统方法确定519份涂片阳性标本中有343份培养出结核分枝杆菌呈阳性,212份(62%)在3周内产生了可接受的结果。传统方法的结果在3至4周内报告,而使用BACTEC方法获得结果所需的时间为5至21天(平均11.5天)。结果表明,与传统方法相比,放射测量法能更频繁地提供可报告的结果,且节省时间。